Hi All,
When I try to install the openssl in window2000 under cygwin
platform. The following errors outputted. Pls help to solve it. Thanks.
Best Regards,
Xiaogang (Nick) XU
making all in crypto...
make[1]: Entering directory `/
> Thanks, I had forgotten that the time that I am calculating it is not
> the time of the CPU and I was calculating the time of the data send
> with the time that is lost with other processes that the linux
> scheduler assign.
> Somebody how I can profile only the time spent by SSL_write and SSL_r
Hello All,
I am getting an error in my Apache log:
Mod_ossl: Unable to establish SSL protocol (server name)
Mod_ossl: SSL call to NZ function nzos_Handshake failed with
error 28864
Any idea why this is happening?
Thanks
_
Michael
A.
Steve,
Thank you very much for your response. The reason I didn't use
sk_X509_num() instead of ((STACK *)ca)->num is because I will change the the
program to load libeay32.dll instead of linking my program with library
libeay32.lib. sk_X509_num() is a macro and it is the replacement of func
On Thu, Jan 13, 2005, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> I want to load and parse certificates from a file(.p12) using
> d2i_PKCS12_fp(..) and PKCS12_parse(..). The file contains two certificates. I
> want to obtain all of the certificates from the file. But after I called
> PKCS1
I'm getting an intermittent error when sending data via SSL_write.
The call returns -1, which translates via SSL_get_error to 5
(SSL_ERROR_SYSCALL, suggesting a problem at the BIO level of the
connection) however the error stack is empty so I'm stuck at how to find
out what's gone wrong.
The co
Hello all,
I want to load and parse certificates from a file(.p12) using
d2i_PKCS12_fp(..) and PKCS12_parse(..). The file contains two certificates. I
want to obtain all of the certificates from the file. But after I called
PKCS12_parse(..) I only got one certificate. I couldn't get the s
> Date: Wed, 12 Jan 2005 16:25:06 -0700
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> Furthermore any felon in jail can have his lawyer register a company
> and then obtain a legit cert from pretty much any official
> certification authority.
True, but not as bad as it sounds.
The felon could register a web s
Shaun Lipscombe wrote:
<>[...]
One last question... it's to do with client certificates. If I have two
websites, say, and they both require client certificates signed by the
CA "ABC. Ltd" there is nothing stopping a client certificate being used
for authorization to access both sites even though th
On Thu, Jan 13, 2005, Shaun Lipscombe wrote:
> * Dr. Stephen Henson wrote:
>
> > On Thu, Jan 13, 2005, Shaun Lipscombe wrote:
> >
> > > Another question I have is I have seen documentation on the net showing
> > > CSR's being generated that catenate the private key and PEM encoded
> > > certific
* Dr. Stephen Henson wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 13, 2005, Shaun Lipscombe wrote:
>
> > Why is it that a Microsoft box requires SSL certificates be imported
> > from a PCKS12 file when all other operating systems and software are OK
> > with a PEM certificate?
>
> It doesn't. You can do that of course
On Thu, Jan 13, 2005, Shaun Lipscombe wrote:
> I have used openssl to setup a CA to sign site certificates and client
> certificates. All is working just great , however I have a couple of
> questions to ask so that I dont go insane.
>
> Why is it that a Microsoft box requires SSL certificates b
I have used openssl to setup a CA to sign site certificates and client
certificates. All is working just great , however I have a couple of
questions to ask so that I dont go insane.
Why is it that a Microsoft box requires SSL certificates be imported
from a PCKS12 file when all other operating s
Thanks, I had forgotten that the time that I am calculating it is not
the time of the CPU and I was calculating the time of the data send
with the time that is lost with other processes that the linux
scheduler assign.
Somebody how I can profile only the time spent by SSL_write and SSL_read?
Thank
At 05:18 PM 1/12/2005 -0700, L Nehring writeth:
>Have look at this http://www.schneier.com/paper-pki-ft.txt
>and some other papers on the that site. I run my own CA because I
>neither trust nor can I afford Verisign. There's no technical difference
>in the certs.
>
>best regards,
>Lance
>http://w
At 07:05 PM 1/12/2005 +0100, Peter Sylvester writeth:
>
>The first thing is to make the dll's it stdcall friendly. :-)
>(at least that the state of the art 3 years ago?)
Well, stdcall-friendly is not necessary for COM. I was thinking a nice
wrapper DLL that implemented a COM server and made the a
16 matches
Mail list logo
