I sent numerous messages to the list moderator and get replies back
(saying "be patient...my owner may be asleep", etc.)...but sheesh it's
been like months already.
__
OpenSSL Project http://www
Do I ever feel like an idiot. I was building a minimalist configuration
file for you and, lo, it started working -- on all versions of 0.9.7
that I have been experimenting with (a,b,c).
After a little more experimentation to figure out why this suddenly
started working, I uncovered my mistake:
On Sat, Nov 22, 2003, Dr. Stephen Henson wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 22, 2003, Dr. Stephen Henson wrote:
>
> > On Fri, Nov 21, 2003, Joseph Bruni wrote:
> >
> > > I've been poking around in the v3_alt.c file to try to determine why the email
> > > address is not getting copied or moved into the extens
On Sat, Nov 22, 2003, Dr. Stephen Henson wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 21, 2003, Joseph Bruni wrote:
>
> > I've been poking around in the v3_alt.c file to try to determine why the email
> > address is not getting copied or moved into the extension. After sprinkling in a
> > few debug statements, it look
On Fri, Nov 21, 2003, Joseph Bruni wrote:
> I've been poking around in the v3_alt.c file to try to determine why the email
> address is not getting copied or moved into the extension. After sprinkling in a few
> debug statements, it looks like the copy_email() function is broken and never enters
I've been poking around in the v3_alt.c file to try to determine why the email address
is not getting copied or moved into the extension. After sprinkling in a few debug
statements, it looks like the copy_email() function is broken and never enters the
"while" loop. Even though the DN has an 'em
Ok guys, thank you for your very precious help.
Take care.
Marc Gaudichet
> -Message d'origine-
> De : Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Envoyé : vendredi 21 novembre 2003 12:33
> À : Marc Gaudichet
> Cc : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Objet : Re: RE : RAND_status always
I had tried that as well with no success, which is what is leading me to believe this
is a bug.
In the CSR, I have the emailAddress field set in the DN. In the CA section of the
configuration file, I have subjectAltName=email:move in the section referenced from
the x509_extensions option:
x509
> Yes, of course, there are special conditions that allow sloppy
> randomness. If you look at some of the OpenSSL test programs, you
> will see that we seed with static strings. I was speaking from a more
> general point of view, and perhaps I should not have said something as
> harsch as "Never
Hi all,I get a fatal handshake_failure from server when I try to connect it from my client. I have attached the verbose debug output from client to server.
In summary, client_hello and server_hello done messages for sslv3 are received properly. After that when client sends the change_cipher_spec w
On Fri, Nov 21, 2003 at 01:40:32PM +0100, Pär Ahrén wrote:
> Lutz Jaenicke wrote:
>
>
>
> > (Values changing for higher "time" values but the tendency is clear:
> > session reuse _is_ a performance booster...
>
> The strange thing is that if I don't do "-www /" it works fine
> This is agains a
Lutz Jaenicke wrote:
> (Values changing for higher "time" values but the tendency is clear:
> session reuse _is_ a performance booster...
The strange thing is that if I don't do "-www /" it works fine
This is agains a domino-server for reference
=
Looks ok: No "-www"
==
On Thu, Nov 20, 2003, Joseph Bruni wrote:
> Given an RSA private key, you can regenerate its matching public key
> with this:
>
> % openssl rsa -in privatekey.pem -pubout >key1.pem
>
> The public key in a certificate can be extracted with this:
>
> % openssl x509 -in certificate.pem -pubout -n
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Fri, 21 Nov 2003 11:05:40 +0100, "Marc Gaudichet"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
mgaudichet> >>Hmm, I doubt very much that running RAND_poll() multiple
mgaudichet> >>times on top of itself gives that much more entropy.
mgaudichet>
mgaudichet> Concerning this, RAND_po
>>Hmm, I doubt very much that running RAND_poll() multiple times on top
of itself gives that much more entropy.
Concerning this, RAND_poll() behaves as follows on Windows systems:
- call to NetStatisticsGet for LanManWorkstation and
LanManServer services;
- call to CryptGenRandom t
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Thu, 20 Nov 2003 22:11:57 -0800, Brian Hatch <[EMAIL
PROTECTED]> said:
bri>
bri> >mgaudichet> Do you have a better solution than above (e.g. hardcode
bri> >mgaudichet> some kind of random data and use it with RAND_seed()...),
bri> >mgaudichet> or does it seem ok
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Thu, 20 Nov 2003 19:56:23 -0700, Joseph Bruni
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
jbruni> I've been trying to get the "subjectAltName=email:move" directive to
jbruni> work in the "ca" command with no luck, so I think this might be a bug.
jbruni>
jbruni> It seems that the
17 matches
Mail list logo
