Shawn Tagseth wrote:
> Already is: FreeSwan http://www.xs4all.nl/~freeswan
Are you sure FreeS/WAN is OpenSSL-based?
If not please use the following algorithm next time:
1. think
2. write
Regards,
Mike
---
Michal Trojnara * +48 501 00 12 43
IT Security Officer * PTK Centertel
Hello,
I've D/Led openssl-0.9.3a, and try to add multi-thread support
by doing the following modifications,
1. Find "FreeBSD-elf" in ./configure.
2. Replace '(unknown)' with '-pthread' at that line.
3. Compile as instructions.
Then I compiled it on my FreeBSD 3.2 box. It compiled and tested o
I previously used open-ssl to build my Apache/mod-ssl httpd, but
now I can't seem to get started using it to build a simple SSL-enabled
http client. I'm getting `undefined reference' errors when linking.
OS: FreeBSD-3.1
Compilers: gcc-2.7.2.1 and egcs-1.1.2 (tried both)
openssl version: OpenSSL
Has anyone heard of an effort to incorporate openssl into the ACE C++ wrappers
project at http://siesta.cs.wustl.edu/~schmidt/ACE.html?
Brad
__
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
User Support
Hi!
I'm using openssl 0.9.3a running under Windows NT4 (SP4), compiling
with MS VC++ 6.0. I'm trying to understand how the library works, so
I've put together some code that just tries to connect to a www-server
talking SSL and try to issue a "GET / HTTP/1.0\n\n" and see what gets
back. Now, I've
Can't seem to make any headway.
Have Net_SSLeay 1.03 perl 5.05_2 on i386
both openssl 92b and 91c
with 91c the make is without error, however
make test fails with bunches of errors telling me that
the DynaLoader can't resolve symbols because:
Can't load 'blib/arch/auto/Net/SSLeay/SSLeay.so' for
Already is: FreeSwan http://www.xs4all.nl/~freeswan
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
[snip]
> I guess it's a matter of time till somebody
> outside the
> U.S. hacks up an internation implementation.
__
I forgot to give the URL for NIST Cerberus.
Bodo Moeller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ,in message <19990707090043.B
[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, wrote:
> in turn is handled by SSH. Of course what you really want for a VPN
> is something datagram-based, not TCP; but in any case it's much better
> than
Bodo Moeller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ,in message <19990707090043.B
[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, wrote:
> in turn is handled by SSH. Of course what you really want for a VPN
> is something datagram-based, not TCP; but in any case it's much better
> than nothing.
What you REALLY want is IPSEC. If
Nicolas Pomarede <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> But when I tried the previous version (0.92b), which have a slightly
> different configure syntax (one must run util/ssldir.pl to change the
> location of the installation), it build just fine and all the tests in
> 'make test' went OK.
>
> The compil
I hunted through all of the mail archives and other documentation
currently available on the OpenSSL webpages and haven't been able
to find anything that covers the situation described below. If
there is a webpage/document/whatever already on this matter, please
point me to it, I would sincerely
Hello,
I am trying to compile OpenSSL 0.9.3a on win32 plateform, but I have 2
errors in compile.
I will use OpenSSL with Borland C++ Builder 3, so I followed the
instructions from INSTALL.W32 :
Run ms\bcb4.bat -> OK
Make -f bcb.mak-> 2 errors
Here is a part of what make writes :
Hi again!
I have tested on all the platforms several times,
and I could still see that one of the machines have problem with slow generation
of private keys. It seems like Test2 machine always is 3 minutes slower then all
other HP installations ??? One other odd thing is that this machine h
On Wed, Jul 07, 1999 at 11:50:04AM +0200, Nicolas Pomarede wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> As I previously reported it on this mailling list, I had some problems
> whem trying to build version 0.93a on an HP UNIX B.10.20
>
> Actually, it stops when running 'make test' and trying the x509
> conversions :
> I have compared different platforms when generating RSA private keys through the
>openssl testapplication. How come,
> different HP 9000 machines with HP-UX 10.20 differs with over 3 minutes ??? I am
>thinking if absence of Math.processor or
> different Math.processor could be the problem ?? A
On Wed, Jul 07, 1999 at 08:46:29AM +0200, Bodo Moeller wrote:
> >> is the SSL library safe in a multi-threaded environment ?
[...]
> Also you have to provide a callback that returns a thread ID (unless
> you're using Windows, where OpenSSL already knows how to obtain the
> thread ID from the OS)
Hello,
As I previously reported it on this mailling list, I had some problems
whem trying to build version 0.93a on an HP UNIX B.10.20
Actually, it stops when running 'make test' and trying the x509
conversions :
-
echo test normal x509v1 certificate
test normal x509v1 cer
Hi !
I have compared different platforms when generating RSA
private keys through the openssl testapplication. How come, different HP 9000
machines with HP-UX 10.20 differs with over 3 minutes ??? I am thinking if
absence of Math.processor or different Math.processor could be the proble
Hi !
I have compared different platforms when generating RSA
private keys through the openssl testapplication. How come, different HP 9000
machines with HP-UX 10.20 differs with over 3 minutes ??? I am thinking if
absence of Math.processor or different Math.processor could be the problem
?
Does anybody know where i could find the script usercert.cgi written by
tim hudson?
Yann Algayon
S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
20 matches
Mail list logo
