On Mon, 26 Apr 2010 18:04:20 -0700, Stickman wrote:
>> My guess is that this is a simple oversight when porting over to
>> viewer 2.0 ui infrastructure.
>
> If I had more time, I'd make it my crusade to document and request the
> re-addition of every feature missing in 2.0. There's a fair list o
> would a meta-issue be an appropriate way to start this work?
Yes. I brought that up to Samuel and he put on the black shades and
was all, "WE WILL KNOW."
Still, couldn't hurt at all. But if it wasn't necessary, I wasn't
gonna do something like that this close to my last finals week.
> anyone k
Thanks for opening this JIRA, Stickman. Voted.
On 27 April 2010 03:04, Stickman wrote:
> > My guess is that this is a simple oversight when porting over to
> > viewer 2.0 ui infrastructure.
>
> If I had more time, I'd make it my crusade to document and request the
> re-addition of every feature
heya Joe,
in your initial announcement you said there would be three TPV meetings...
is the third one today/cancelled/postponed/forgotten?
bye,
LC
___
Policies and (un)subscribe information available here:
http://wiki.secondlife.com/wiki/OpenSourc