On Mon, 26 Apr 2010 18:04:20 -0700, Stickman <stick...@gmail.com> wrote: >> My guess is that this is a simple oversight when porting over to >> viewer 2.0 ui infrastructure. > > If I had more time, I'd make it my crusade to document and request the > re-addition of every feature missing in 2.0. There's a fair list of > things you can't do anymore. Most of them are ancillary, like this, > but having them missing is a little annoying.
would a meta-issue be an appropriate way to start this work? anyone knows of an existing one? opensource obscure _______________________________________________ Policies and (un)subscribe information available here: http://wiki.secondlife.com/wiki/OpenSource-Dev Please read the policies before posting to keep unmoderated posting privileges
