Re: [opensource-dev] [META] User stories and issue tracker readability

2010-10-28 Thread WolfPup Lowenhar
To my understanding here is the following: 1. The main jiras (VWR, WEB, SVC) are for general issues basically no user story. 2. When they get pulled to a particular teams jira ( STORM, DN, MESH ) they then get converted to a 'story' with sub tasks relating to that 'story' This is my t

Re: [opensource-dev] [META] User stories and issue tracker readability

2010-10-27 Thread Zai Lynch
> > It is very helpful to us when scanning lists of issues to be able to see > whether they are motivated by a user-visible effect or are concerned > with viewer developers or some other audience. > But isn't that what components could be used for? Affects: Users, UI Affects: Merchants, i18n etc.

Re: [opensource-dev] [META] User stories and issue tracker readability

2010-10-27 Thread Oz Linden (Scott Lawrence)
On 2010-10-23 12:25, SuezanneC Baskerville wrote: > > Part of the change was to add the words "As a user," to the Summary > field. > > https://jira.secondlife.com/browse/VWR-675 > > They also changed the importance from minor to major. I suspect > these two actions are connected. > > I suspec

Re: [opensource-dev] [META] User stories and issue tracker readability

2010-10-23 Thread SuezanneC Baskerville
Coincidentally right next to Boroondas's message in my gmail was a message about a change in a years old jira issue I created. Part of the change was to add the words "As a user," to the Summary field. https://jira.secondlife.com/browse/VWR-675 They also changed the importance from minor to majo