Re: [opensource-dev] Replacement class for LLDynamicArray

On Debug build with VS2010 professional array bounds checking is at link. The first check is a library debug level check. So, if you compile the viewer debug and don't have prebuilt libraries that are also debug built at the same level  the link stops with file.obj is at a different level than il

Re: [opensource-dev] Replacement class for LLDynamicArray

On 10/05/2014 2:35 AM, Brian McGroarty wrote: > On Fri, May 9, 2014 at 8:43 AM, Nicky D. > wrote: > > True, but on the other hand, you'd never call array[i] with i > out of > array bound (it would be a bug, and throwing an exception via >

Re: [opensource-dev] Replacement class for LLDynamicArray

> > > Slight tweak: [] on out of bounds members is undefined, but specific > implementations may still check. > > Most (maybe even all) STL implementations support bounds checking with a > compile flag. If anyone's eager to experiment, it would be nice to add that > to the debug build flags and see

Re: [opensource-dev] Replacement class for LLDynamicArray

On Fri, May 9, 2014 at 8:43 AM, Nicky D. wrote: > > True, but on the other hand, you'd never call array[i] with i out of >> array bound (it would be a bug, and throwing an exception via the use >> of at(i) is no better than "undefined behaviour" > > that will also lead to a crash in the end). > >

Re: [opensource-dev] Replacement class for LLDynamicArray

On Fri, May 9, 2014 at 6:37 AM, Nicky D. wrote: > >> > I notice "operator[](i)" is used in the interesting, >> >> With std::vector, you could also use array.at(i), which is equivalent. > > > vector::at will do a runtime check if the index is out of bounds, in that > case it throws > an exception.

Re: [opensource-dev] Replacement class for LLDynamicArray

> > True, but on the other hand, you'd never call array[i] with i out of > array bound (it would be a bug, and throwing an exception via the use > of at(i) is no better than "undefined behaviour" that will also lead to a crash in the end). Wrong. See Heartbleed. It depends on if the page behind

Re: [opensource-dev] Replacement class for LLDynamicArray

On Fri, 9 May 2014 15:37:15 +0200, Nicky D. wrote: > > > I notice "operator[](i)" is used in the interesting, > > > > With std::vector, you could also use array.at(i), which is equivalent. > > vector::at will do a runtime check if the index is out of bounds, in > that case it throws an exception.

Re: [opensource-dev] Replacement class for LLDynamicArray

Am Freitag, 9. Mai 2014, 15:54:10 schrieb Ambrosia: > make that items->at(i) to match your example. > > On Fri, May 9, 2014 at 3:53 PM, Ambrosia wrote: > > array->at(i), if 'array' is a pointer to a vector. Thanks!!! Cheers, LC ___ Policies and (un

Re: [opensource-dev] Replacement class for LLDynamicArray

I have a copy of viewer-interesting that I patched with code from my NaCl-release repo. I can upload it to my repo later so you can see examples of how I converted custom code to the new types. On Fri, May 9, 2014 at 3:52 PM, Nicky Perian wrote: > haven't tried, looks like the best choice is it

Re: [opensource-dev] Replacement class for LLDynamicArray

make that items->at(i) to match your example. On Fri, May 9, 2014 at 3:53 PM, Ambrosia wrote: > array->at(i), if 'array' is a pointer to a vector. > > --Chalice Yao > > > On Fri, May 9, 2014 at 3:47 PM, Lance Corrimal > wrote: > >> Am Freitag, 9. Mai 2014, 15:37:15 schrieb Nicky D.: >> > > > I

Re: [opensource-dev] Replacement class for LLDynamicArray

array->at(i), if 'array' is a pointer to a vector. --Chalice Yao On Fri, May 9, 2014 at 3:47 PM, Lance Corrimal wrote: > Am Freitag, 9. Mai 2014, 15:37:15 schrieb Nicky D.: > > > > I notice "operator[](i)" is used in the interesting, > > > > > > With std::vector, you could also use array.at(i),

Re: [opensource-dev] Replacement class for LLDynamicArray

haven't tried, looks like the best choice is items->array.at(i) On Friday, May 9, 2014 8:47 AM, Lance Corrimal wrote: Am Freitag, 9. Mai 2014, 15:37:15 schrieb Nicky D.: >> > > I notice "operator[](i)" is used in the interesting, >> > >> > With std::vector, you could also use array.at(i), w

Re: [opensource-dev] Replacement class for LLDynamicArray

Am Freitag, 9. Mai 2014, 15:37:15 schrieb Nicky D.: > > > I notice "operator[](i)" is used in the interesting, > > > > With std::vector, you could also use array.at(i), which is equivalent. So what would i do with a items->get(i) (excuse my stupid)? Cheers LC ___

Re: [opensource-dev] Replacement class for LLDynamicArray

> > > > I notice "operator[](i)" is used in the interesting, > > With std::vector, you could also use array.at(i), which is equivalent. > > vector::at will do a runtime check if the index is out of bounds, in that case it throws an exception. vector::operator[] will not do this check, causing unde

Re: [opensource-dev] Replacement class for LLDynamicArray

On Fri, 9 May 2014 05:17:42 -0700 (PDT), Nicky Perian wrote: > >"array[i]" instead of "array.get(i), etc... > > > old code snip  const Type& get(S32 index) const { return > std::vector::operator[](index); } > > Is array[i] same as operator[](i) ? Yep. It's just the way the [] operator is decl

Re: [opensource-dev] Replacement class for LLDynamicArray

>"array[i]" instead of "array.get(i), etc... old code snip  const Type& get(S32 index) const { return std::vector::operator[](index); } Is array[i] same as operator[](i) ? I notice "operator[](i)" is used in the interesting, Nicky On Friday, May 9, 2014 6:14 AM, Nicky Perian wrote: forg

Re: [opensource-dev] Replacement class for LLDynamicArray

forgot the link to the standard  cppreference.com cppreference.com optional  (library fundamentals TS) any  (library fundamentals TS) string_view   (library fundamentals TS) memory_resource  (library fundamentals TS) Filesystem library  (filesystem TS) View on en.cppreference.com Preview b

Re: [opensource-dev] Replacement class for LLDynamicArray

bring up lldarray.h from the old version. Look at the underlying code for the std::vector methods that were wrapped there. add #include where needed. find std::vector method in the standard. using the standard and the old header modify the code.___ Poli

Re: [opensource-dev] Replacement class for LLDynamicArray

On Fri, 09 May 2014 09:24:41 +0200, Lance Corrimal wrote: > Hi, > > And what did they terll you there? Please share, I'm banging my head against > the same thing. > > Cheers, > LC > > Am Donnerstag, 8. Mai 2014, 15:34:39 schrieb Nicky Perian: > > Never mind, got guidance from the #opensl > >

Re: [opensource-dev] Replacement class for LLDynamicArray

Hi, And what did they terll you there? Please share, I'm banging my head against the same thing. Cheers, LC Am Donnerstag, 8. Mai 2014, 15:34:39 schrieb Nicky Perian: > Never mind, got guidance from the #opensl > > > On Thursday, May 8, 2014 4:48 PM, Nicky Perian > wrote: > > LLDynamicArr

Re: [opensource-dev] Replacement class for LLDynamicArray

Never mind, got guidance from the #opensl   On Thursday, May 8, 2014 4:48 PM, Nicky Perian wrote: LLDynamicArray was dropped in viewer-interesting. > > > >What is the replacement for it? > > >Nicky > > > >___ Policies and (un)subscribe information av

[opensource-dev] Replacement class for LLDynamicArray

LLDynamicArray was dropped in viewer-interesting. What is the replacement for it? Nicky ___ Policies and (un)subscribe information available here: http://wiki.secondlife.com/wiki/OpenSource-Dev Please read the policies before posting to keep unmoderate