On Fri, May 9, 2014 at 6:37 AM, Nicky D. <sl.nicky...@googlemail.com> wrote:
> >> > I notice "operator[](i)" is used in the interesting, >> >> With std::vector, you could also use array.at(i), which is equivalent. > > > vector::at will do a runtime check if the index is out of bounds, in that > case it throws > an exception. > > vector::operator[] will not do this check, causing undefined behavior when > accessing > elements out of bounds. > Slight tweak: [] on out of bounds members is undefined, but specific implementations may still check. Most (maybe even all) STL implementations support bounds checking with a compile flag. If anyone's eager to experiment, it would be nice to add that to the debug build flags and see if debugging performance is still tolerable on all platforms. -- *Brian McGroarty *| Application Security, Platform Engineering *Linden Lab* | Makers of Shared Creative Spaces <http://lindenlab.com/>
_______________________________________________ Policies and (un)subscribe information available here: http://wiki.secondlife.com/wiki/OpenSource-Dev Please read the policies before posting to keep unmoderated posting privileges
