Re: [opensource-dev] Viewer Policy Changes: Clarity vs. giving clarifications

2012-02-26 Thread Tateru Nino
Unless the staff member states specifically that it is an official statement on behalf of the company, yes. It's just hearsay without that or without an announcement through proper channels. On 27/02/2012 11:46 AM, Tigro Spottystripes wrote: > Hasn't LL said in the past that statements by employee

Re: [opensource-dev] Viewer Policy Changes: Clarity vs. giving clarifications (was: opensource-dev Digest, Vol 25, Issue 25)

2012-02-26 Thread Tigro Spottystripes
Hasn't LL said in the past that statements by employees should not be interpreted as representing the opinions of LL itself, specially when it comes to policies and rules and such? On Sun, Feb 26, 2012 at 12:42 PM, Boroondas Gupte < slli...@boroon.dasgupta.ch> wrote: > On 02/26/2012 02:08 PM, Jo

[opensource-dev] Viewer Policy Changes: Clarity vs. giving clarifications (was: opensource-dev Digest, Vol 25, Issue 25)

2012-02-26 Thread Boroondas Gupte
On 02/26/2012 02:08 PM, John Jackson wrote: > It's just another LL intentionally fuzzy policy. > This allows them to make whatever ruling they like when the time comes and > claim it has been stated "Policy". > > You will not get any real clarification. At an inworld meeting, Oz has given the thir

Re: [opensource-dev] opensource-dev Digest, Vol 25, Issue 25

2012-02-26 Thread John Jackson
It's just another LL intentionally fuzzy policy. This allows them to make whatever ruling they like when the time comes and claim it has been stated "Policy". You will not get any real clarification. On 2/25/2012 2:00 PM, opensource-dev-requ...@lists.secondlife.com wrote: > Send opensource-dev ma