On 02/26/2012 02:08 PM, John Jackson wrote: > It's just another LL intentionally fuzzy policy. > This allows them to make whatever ruling they like when the time comes and > claim it has been stated "Policy". > > You will not get any real clarification.
At an inworld meeting, Oz has given the third party viewer developers some clarification. Though, I'd prefer policies to be written such that they are clear in and of themselves. This doesn't mean they cannot let some room for interpretation, but a policy shouldn't give a reader with common sense but not knowing about the clarifications an impression that clearly contradicts the actual intention of the policy. @Oz: If the policy isn't being changed to be more clear, it might be advantageous to re-state the clarifications you gave us at that meeting (maybe summarized) here in public, as they are relevant for more people than those who were around at the inworld meeting. Cheers, Boroondas
_______________________________________________ Policies and (un)subscribe information available here: http://wiki.secondlife.com/wiki/OpenSource-Dev Please read the policies before posting to keep unmoderated posting privileges
