Re: [opensource-dev] Review Request: (STORM-28) As a User, I want the ability to send my calling card to others

2011-02-21 Thread Nicky Perian
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://codereview.secondlife.com/r/159/#review381 --- Ship it! Reduces code and a great feature. I remember going in wo

[opensource-dev] Review Request: (STORM-28) As a User, I want the ability to send my calling card to others

2011-02-21 Thread Seth ProductEngine
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://codereview.secondlife.com/r/159/ --- Review request for Viewer. Summary --- - Added creating own calling ca

Re: [opensource-dev] Is 'STANDALONE' confusing?

2011-02-21 Thread Nicky D.
> We have a suggestion that the term 'STANDALONE' in the build processes > is misleading and should be changed to something that is more accurately > descriptive of what it really does. > > > So... should this be changed?  and if so, to what? > I am fine with changing it to whatever gets the most

Re: [opensource-dev] Is 'STANDALONE' confusing?

2011-02-21 Thread Ibrew Meads
I too would like to see something less confusing. My vote is for USE_LL_SYSTEM_LIBS or USE_LOCAL_SYSTEM_LIBS. I think just USE_SYSTEM_LIBS is too vague. On Feb 21, 2011 9:12 AM, "Ricky" wrote: ___ Policies and (un)subscribe information available here: ht

Re: [opensource-dev] Is 'STANDALONE' confusing?

2011-02-21 Thread Aleric Inglewood
Regarding libraries and the second life viewer we have the following issues: The version of a library (source code + headers) at the moment it is compiled into a binary. In all cases we should only use THOSE headers whenever we compile anything that will link with that binary. This is not always

Re: [opensource-dev] Is 'STANDALONE' confusing?

2011-02-21 Thread Erin Mallory
As a tester I gotta say Boroondas's suggestion to me, is far and away the least confusing... so it gets my vote too... ~Cummere > From: thickbrick.sleaf...@gmail.com > To: opensource-dev@lists.secondlife.com > Date: Mon, 21 Feb 2011 17:00:38 +0200 > Subject: Re: [opensource-dev] Is 'STANDALONE'

Re: [opensource-dev] Is 'STANDALONE' confusing?

2011-02-21 Thread Ricky
My vote is for USE_SYSTEM_LIBS. It needs no semantic inversion, only a simple name replace. The only issue I can think of is that system wide user libs are considered "system" by this, but I consider that to be a trivial complaint. That said, the above inverting suggetion is still better than wh

[opensource-dev] VS2010 Express Start To Finish -- Request testing and feedback

2011-02-21 Thread Nicky Perian
https://bitbucket.org/NickyP/viewer-autobuild2010-wip This is set to call self built google breakpad from: https://bitbucket.org/NickyP/viewer-autobuild2010-wip/downloads/google_breakpad-0.0.0-revNickyP-windows-20110215.tar.bz2 autobuild config: C:\Users\Bill\lindenhg\autobuild-vcexpress-wip\bin

Re: [opensource-dev] Is 'STANDALONE' confusing?

2011-02-21 Thread Ima Mechanique
> On 02/21/2011 03:28 PM, Oz Linden (Scott Lawrence) wrote: > > If we are going to change it, the replacement term should, in addition > > to being more accurately descriptive of what it does, be an affirmative > > term - don't suggest any 'NO_*" replacements. > > Would it be acceptable to inver

Re: [opensource-dev] Is 'STANDALONE' confusing?

2011-02-21 Thread Boroondas Gupte
On 02/21/2011 04:41 PM, Aleric Inglewood wrote: > A LOT worse, but still better than 'standalone' would be USE_SYSTEM_LIBS. Why would you consider USE_SYSTEM_LIBS worse than other suggestions? Cheers, Boroondas ___ Policies and (un)subscribe information

Re: [opensource-dev] Attachments from stale group notices do not open

2011-02-21 Thread Sheet Spotter
Opening attachments from a stale group notice has been failing for a year or more. https://jira.secondlife.com/browse/VWR-18240 There are many related issues and duplicates. The problem reliably occurs with the production viewer when trying to open a group notice that was received hours a

Re: [opensource-dev] Is 'STANDALONE' confusing?

2011-02-21 Thread Aleric Inglewood
I agree too. I have found 'standalone' to be confusing all along, and inverting it (ON <--> OFF) is a very logical thing to do. If inverting is acceptable then USE_PREBUILT_LIBS sounds good. Or perhaps, USE_LL_PREBUILT_LIBS which would be more clear, but wouldn't work for the TPV's :(. If invertin

Re: [opensource-dev] Is 'STANDALONE' confusing?

2011-02-21 Thread Discrete Dreamscape
USE_PREBUILT_LIBS doesn't make absolute sense either if you consider the fact that your system's libraries are "prebuilt". This would imply that the inverse of the setting would cause supporting libraries to be built from source or some such. I would make it something like "USE_LINDEN_LIBS". Dis

Re: [opensource-dev] Is 'STANDALONE' confusing?

2011-02-21 Thread Thickbrick Sleaford
On Monday 21 February 2011 16:38:01 Boroondas Gupte wrote: > On 02/21/2011 03:28 PM, Oz Linden (Scott Lawrence) wrote: > > If we are going to change it, the replacement term should, in addition > > to being more accurately descriptive of what it does, be an affirmative > > term - don't suggest any

Re: [opensource-dev] Is 'STANDALONE' confusing?

2011-02-21 Thread Boroondas Gupte
On 02/21/2011 03:28 PM, Oz Linden (Scott Lawrence) wrote: > If we are going to change it, the replacement term should, in addition > to being more accurately descriptive of what it does, be an affirmative > term - don't suggest any 'NO_*" replacements. Would it be acceptable to invert the settin

[opensource-dev] Is 'STANDALONE' confusing?

2011-02-21 Thread Oz Linden (Scott Lawrence)
We have a suggestion that the term 'STANDALONE' in the build processes is misleading and should be changed to something that is more accurately descriptive of what it really does. https://jira.secondlife.com/browse/OPEN-11 We discussed this briefly last week: https://wiki.secondlife.com/wiki/O

Re: [opensource-dev] Daily Scrum Summary - Friday, February 18

2011-02-21 Thread Opensource Obscure
On Mon, Feb 21, 2011 at 09:36, Anya Kanevsky wrote: > Bao Linden > PAST > worked on VBO improvements and testing, Is it possible to have some more details or links to JIRA about this? > Vadim ProductEngine > IMPEDIMENTS > Who's gonna create out-of-the-box viewer layouts for STORM-2? Would use

Re: [opensource-dev] Extended Groups broken?

2011-02-21 Thread Opensource Obscure
This happened to me multiple times yesterday while I was on a TPV (Kirstens last release). Please tell the list if you find or file an appropriate JIRA issue about this so that I can add my feedback. Opensource Obscure On Mon, Feb 21, 2011 at 08:38, Kadah Coba wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESS

Re: [opensource-dev] Daily Scrum Summary - Friday, February 18 - correction

2011-02-21 Thread Anya Kanevsky
That was weird. I robbed from Paul to give to Seth. The wikiis corrected, and below the correct status for both. Sorry about that! Paul ProductEngine -- *PAST* - STORM-357 (Gestures button is in the pr

Re: [opensource-dev] Extended Groups broken?

2011-02-21 Thread Kadah Coba
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Yes, I was getting repro while I was on the fallowing, Second Life Server 11.02.08.220555 Second Life RC Magnum 11.02.15.221184 and the previous one As well as the previous LeTigre (my home region was apparently moved to release channel in the last rol

[opensource-dev] Daily Scrum Summary - Friday, February 18

2011-02-21 Thread Anya Kanevsky
Sprint 11, ends 02.28.11 Thursday, February 17th - Friday, Frebruary 18th General Notes -- - Sprint 11 extended until 02.28.11 - Daily Scrum meetings cancelled Thu & Fri due to hackathon. - Kudos to those who sent their reports! - Today’s summary both