My vote is for USE_SYSTEM_LIBS. It needs no semantic inversion, only a simple name replace.
The only issue I can think of is that system wide user libs are considered "system" by this, but I consider that to be a trivial complaint. That said, the above inverting suggetion is still better than what we have now! :P Ricky Cron Stardust On Monday, February 21, 2011, Boroondas Gupte <slli...@boroon.dasgupta.ch> wrote: > On 02/21/2011 04:41 PM, Aleric Inglewood wrote: >> A LOT worse, but still better than 'standalone' would be USE_SYSTEM_LIBS. > Why would you consider USE_SYSTEM_LIBS worse than other suggestions? > > Cheers, > Boroondas > _______________________________________________ > Policies and (un)subscribe information available here: > http://wiki.secondlife.com/wiki/OpenSource-Dev > Please read the policies before posting to keep unmoderated posting privileges > _______________________________________________ Policies and (un)subscribe information available here: http://wiki.secondlife.com/wiki/OpenSource-Dev Please read the policies before posting to keep unmoderated posting privileges