* Chavdar Ivanov [2009-12-15 15:04]:
> Yesterday I upgraded three of my OpenSolaris systems to 129; this afternoon I
> came to find one of them very sluggish; it turned out that:
>
> PID USERNAME SIZE RSS STATE PRI NICE TIME CPU PROCESS/NLWP
> 11 root 1536M 1048M sleep
* Chad Welsh [2009-11-24 04:58]:
> I guess there is a limit to how much you can update at one time when
> using Opensloaris 1002 b127 or any other Opensloaris version?
There is no limit imposed, either by the client or the server.
> If I try to install large packages like Openoffice, Java 7 ru
* Haiou Fu (Kevin) [2009-11-20 15:50]:
> You nailed it, it is an x86 version, while I am on SPARC:
>
> r...@osol:/# file /usr/bin/netperf
> /usr/bin/netperf: ELF 32-bit LSB executable 80386 Version 1 [FPU],
> dynamically linked, not stripped
>
> The question is:
> (2) Why IPS (netperf.p5i
* Brian Ruthven - Solaris Network Sustaining - Sun UK
[2009-10-27 10:39]:
> http://www.sun.com/bigadmin/content/selfheal/sdev_intro.jsp
> http://wikis.sun.com/display/BigAdmin/SMF+Short+Cuts
> http://blogs.warwick.ac.uk/chrismay/entry/solaris_smf_manifest/
A relatively recent (Mar 2009) tool i
* Brandon Hume [2009-10-21 16:17]:
> On Wed, 2009-10-21 at 10:55 -0500, Harry Putnam wrote:
> > Anyone recognize the problem I hit while installing
> > Term::ReadLine::Gnu
>
> > cc -c -D_LARGEFILE_SOURCE -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 -D_TS_ERRNO -xO3
> > -xspace -xildoff -DVERSION=\"1.19\" -DXS_VER
* solarg [2009-01-14 09:56]:
> I'm also wondering if it's not valuable to integrate a tool like module
> (http://modules.sourceforge.net/) ?
I think that the HPC community group had some interest in integrating
modules, too.
- Stephen
--
s...@sun.com http://blogs.sun.com/sch/
_
* Bill Shannon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-12-05 20:01]:
> Bill Shannon wrote:
> > pkg.opensolaris.org seems to be down. Is this on purpose? Did I miss
> > the announcement? Isn't this site run on our high availability
> > infrastructure?
> >
> > Is there another site, perhaps an internal Sun sit
* Bill Shannon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-12-05 23:55]:
> The instructions on
> http://opensolaris.org/os/project/indiana/resources/relnotes/200805/image-update/
> don't work for a build number of "101a".
>
> How do I upgrade from 101a to 101b?
I don't like use of $BUILD, because we do occasiona
* Shawn Walker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-07-24 20:20]:
> Joga wrote:
> > I looked at that url and I see that it is FireFox fetching a simple
> > png file ( 1p.png ) and passing a parameter for the time as well as
> > reporting the User-Agent. So that seems like pretty obvious user base
> > tracking
* Paul B. Henson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-05-14 19:39]:
> I believe each release will also have updated packages over time as
> fixes/features are added.
Yes.
> Given the new packaging format for openSolaris, I'm curious what would the
> difference between a system originally installed as 5/0
Thanks for the update, Derek.
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://blogs.sun.com/sch/
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
* a b <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-03-11 20:36]:
>
> > I'm not going to try to defend the SDC -- this is neither the right
> > list to discuss it nor do I have any connection at all with the people
> > who run that site -- but there's a complication here that I think the
> > folks posting (and vocife
The polling system is now open for the 2008 Board election, as well
as the determination of two proposed amendments to the Constitution
and the solicitation of input for community priorities. Core
Contributors from all Community Groups are eligible to participate in
the poll. The
* Kyle McDonald <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-02-08 19:56]:
> I see no [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailiing list.
>
> (I also didn't see a nameservice-discuss, or ldap-discuss list either)
>
> Is there a goo list whee one can find experts or developers for the
> differen nameservices in solaris?
[EMAIL PRO
* Sean Sprague <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-02-05 16:41]:
> Al,
>
> [Snip!]
>
> > [the in-test-199.iso.torrent link is MIA and I'd rather
> > just get a copy of the iso file than mess with bittorrent]
>
> +1 - I don't think that anyone in their right mind would prefer a
> Torrent-based acquisition
* UNIX admin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-12-11 20:59]:
> > /usr/php5/5.2.4/lib/libphp5-5.2.4.so over to
> > /usr/apache/libexec/libphp5.so.
>
> Why in blue blazes did they compile it for /usr/php5/? I mean, PHP
> doesn't clash with anything Solaris delivers... they could have stuck
> him directly i
* David Van Couvering <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-12-04 01:15]:
> Great to hear some progress is being made. I just saw an email where
> it appears an OpenSolaris bug id was created. I still don't know what
> happened to my initial bug report, but oh well.
>
> Was JIRA considered as an option? I
* Joerg Schilling <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-11-02 20:11]:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > >Interesting! Why then does Sun remove them from the code?
> >
> > Remove how? It's not in the public sfw gate?
>
> You seem to have strange ideas from a "complete source" that
> allows a compilation.
In g
* John Levon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-11-01 20:40]:
> On Thu, Nov 01, 2007 at 10:42:51AM -0700, Stephen Hahn wrote:
>
> > > > http://dlc.sun.com/osol/indiana/downloads/current/in-preview.iso
> > >
> > > Is this release freely redistributable? It se
* John Levon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-11-01 13:52]:
> On Thu, Nov 01, 2007 at 04:32:34PM +1300, Glynn Foster wrote:
>
> > I'm very pleased to announce that the first milestone of Project Indiana is
> > now
> > available - called OpenSolaris Developer Preview.
> >
> > It's available for download
* Gary Gendel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-10-22 00:51]:
> Playing devil's advocate...
>
> What I'd really like to do is revisit the need for a sendmail service
> running on non-servers. I understand that currently some mail service
> is required in order to deal with messages from cron and other
>
* [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-06-21 16:14]:
> And when we get to OpenSolaris:
> "The OpenSolaris project is an open source community and a place
> for collaboration and conversation around OpenSolaris technology."
>
> The problem here is that the first two sentences on www.opensola
* William James <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-06-10 11:08]:
> Are there plans to integrate valgrind in solaris? Linux has a large
> lead in code quality because they have tools like valgrind. I think
> Solaris needs such a tool, too
Any time I've been in a discussion about valgrind, we conclude,
r
* Isaac Rozenfeld <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-05-31 14:38]:
> This comes up now and then, yet I honestly believe it can benefit from
> being a community effort.
I guess I would expect that discussion with either the Resource
Management Project
http://opensolaris.org/os/project/rm/
or its
* tarik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-05-09 12:21]:
> hello with all
> under solaris 10
> I do not know for what the server service of DNS and always offline
> here:
> #svcs -a | grep dns
> online svc:/network/dns/client:default
> offline svc:/network/dns/server:default
>
> #svcadm enable svc:/netwo
* Nils Nieuwejaar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-04-15 20:45]:
> Unfortunately, the volume of spam that ended up in the moderators' queue
> was so unmanageable that we eventually had to start rejecting all
> submissions from non-subscribers sight-unseen. That's a lousy way to have
> to run a mailing li
* John Plocher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-04-03 11:09]:
> James Carlson wrote:
> >You've got me. I've pointed out the seeming inconsistency before on
> >other threads, but John Plocher seems to think that it's not a
> >problem.
>
> Uhmmm...
>
umptions.
If you're interested in porting launchd for use by an OpenSolaris
distro, then you might share your portability issues on
opensolaris-code@opensolaris.org to start.
- Stephen
--
Stephen Hahn, PhD Solaris Kernel Development, Sun Microsystems
[EMAI
mybinary calls exit(2), the exit status will be available to the
parent via waitid(2). In your example, the parent would be
the parent of the process which is calling isaexec(3C).
- Stephen
--
Stephen Hahn, PhD Solaris Kernel Development
n form. For these latter cases, it
would be good to discuss how a non-Sun, not-Intel community member
could participate (via NDA, waiver, other methods), if known.
It would also be helpful to identify what technology/device/platform
the open development portion is trying to cov
* David Edmondson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-03-13 11:45]:
> On Tue, Mar 13, 2007 at 11:30:20AM -0700, Stephen Hahn wrote:
> > Although I agree that there are problems with a "give Sun hardware"
> > policy, I am less convinced that there shouldn't be some co
some contributor,
not employed by the device manufacturer, able to test that, with the
device installed, the software actually functions according to the
architectural specification. In particular, and even for devices
where economics apparently preclude such distribution, I'm not sur
; problems with the poll mechanism on
website-discuss.
- Stephen
[] The "Community Priorities/Polling Test" poll has had its closing time
extended by 48 hours, to 23:59 PDT 13 March.
--
Stephen Hahn, PhD Solaris Kernel Development, Sun Microsystems
[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://blo
rch 8 and closes at 23:59 PDT March 11.
See http://poll.opensolaris.org for status and links to instructions.
Concerns regarding the poll content should be shared on cab-discuss;
problems with the poll mechanism on website-discuss.
- Stephen
--
Stephen Hahn, PhD Solaris K
* Simon Phipps <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-03-05 04:15]:
> None of these candidates appear to have accepted their nomination. In
> addition, neither have:
>
> Stephen Hahn
I decline the nomination, although I am very grateful for the
suggestion. It seems to me that I woul
* Laszlo (Laca) Peter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-02-23 12:22]:
> On Fri, 2007-02-23 at 11:51 -0800, Stephen Hahn wrote:
> > > Building against an alternate root has some serious disadvantages:
> > > - you can't be really sure that the build doesn't pick u
* Laszlo (Laca) Peter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-02-23 11:31]:
> On Fri, 2007-02-23 at 10:59 -0800, Stephen Hahn wrote:
> > > > That is, why not just merge CCD, SFE, and SFW into a "freeware"
> > > > consolidation that delivers appropriately to /usr, /
Board reviews the existing
community groups for activity, so we know the gaps, but otherwise, I
agree that we need to recognize this kind of effort in the operating
system.
- Stephen
--
Stephen Hahn, PhD Solaris Kernel Development, Sun Microsystems
[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://blogs.
* Laszlo (Laca) Peter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-02-23 10:10]:
> On Fri, 2007-02-23 at 09:36 -0800, Stephen Hahn wrote:
> > That is, why not just merge CCD, SFE, and SFW into a "freeware"
> > consolidation that delivers appropriately to /usr, /usr/gnu, and
>
* Eric Boutilier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-02-23 09:56]:
> On Fri, 23 Feb 2007, Stephen Hahn wrote:
> >* Laszlo (Laca) Peter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-02-22 18:29]:
> >>So the /usr/gnu proposal[1] was approved by PSARC. Obviously, the
> >>reason for def
* Laszlo (Laca) Peter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-02-22 18:29]:
> So the /usr/gnu proposal[1] was approved by PSARC. Obviously, the
> reason for defining /usr/gnu wasn't theoretical -- it allows moving
> GNU packages from /usr/sfw to /usr or /usr/gnu and it helps us
> integrating more GNU packages i
lla would probably
> be ok too.
Although it's not high on my infrastructure list (which is mostly
about development and governance at the moment), I don't have a
problem with running a news server eventually. (I am nervous about
running news, mail, and web forums in fully gatewaye
* Roland Mainz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-02-18 15:10]:
> Is there a way to prevent things like the posting below ? For example is
> it possibe to reconfigure Jive to allow postings only for people who are
> subscribed to that list or make sure that such postings are queued for
> moderation by the l
headaches and also
> >improve upon previous builds in their infrastructure.
>
> http://blogs.sun.com/sch/entry/opensolaris_restricted_builds_through_the
>
> there used to be purty graphics with that post, but i'm not sure what
> happened to 'em.
They're back. The ser
be sufficient to have, say, two builds of stabilitzation every 3 months
> or so?
At the beginning of January, we talked a bit about this on
opensolaris-code. See
http://www.opensolaris.org/jive/thread.jspa?threadID=21240&tstart=50
and associated references and replies. I am tryi
* James Carlson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-02-13 09:36]:
> Stephen Hahn writes:
> > The current approach is that projects seek sponsoring Community
> > Groups, and that project leads will become Contributors or Core
> > Contributors in the sponsoring Community Grou
match up
sponsorship may have multiple causes, with appeal to the Governing
Board as a fallback.
- Stephen
--
Stephen Hahn, PhD Solaris Kernel Development, Sun Microsystems
[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://blogs.sun.com/sch/
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
The pursuit of
sponsorship is open to either a project or a Community Group.
> What can we do complete the list of contributors as broad yet with
> reasonable accuracy? We don't want to swamp Stephen Hahn with
> hundreds of email request, or do we :)?
I would rather be sw
Community Group privilege.
(Please consider reading the draft Constitution.)
- Stephen
--
Stephen Hahn, PhD Solaris Kernel Development, Sun Microsystems
[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://blogs.sun.com/sch/
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
stopping
development was not considered a serious choice.
(Put another way: if you've liked a feature since, oh, onnv_18, you
probably have unconscious reservations about a 100% focus on culture
change.)
- Stephen
--
Stephen Hahn, PhD Solaris Kernel Development, Sun Microsyste
project
> creation completely automatic. Which might be a good thing.
The initial project proposal process was written to generally allow
projects that had more than one interested individual, and was
appropriate when we didn't know what a project should be; I think Ben
an
at's useful feedback to the OGB, since active
community groups are the backbone of the current draft constitution.
- Stephen
--
Stephen Hahn, PhD Solaris Kernel Development, Sun Microsystems
[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://blogs.sun.com/sch/
___
o
/www.opensolaris.org/os/about/no_source/
>
> Probably ought to be linked to from the General FAQ
> (http://www.opensolaris.org/os/about/faq/)...?
It already is, under the question "What source code does the
OpenSolaris project include?".
- Stephen
--
Ste
with tested ksh93-based
versions. This means that distributions would be less affected by
restrictions around ksh88+smi binary distribution. (That's a shell
scripting project, which probably has the opportunity to also look at
identifying common shell scripting style and practice for O
{Belenix,
Martux, Nexenta, Schillix, Solaris}, then I believe that to be too
severe.
I am hoping that the Appliance Core Contributors will have some
feedback for this discussion in a week or two.
- Stephen
--
Stephen Hahn, PhD Solaris Kernel Development, Sun Microsystems
[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://blogs.sun.com/sch/
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
t ones use the tools we
have to grow into something more complete...
--
Stephen Hahn, PhD Solaris Kernel Development, Sun Microsystems
[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://blogs.sun.com/sch/
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
* David Lloyd <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-01-15 06:49]:
> Project Name
>
> The proposed name of the project is Printable Many Page Solaris Manuals.
+1.
- Stephen
--
Stephen Hahn, PhD Solaris Kernel Development, Sun Microsystems
[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://bl
were published in June 2005
http://www.opensolaris.org/jive/thread.jspa?threadID=10448&tstart=0
and just today
http://www.opensolaris.org/jive/thread.jspa?threadID=21272&tstart=0
Thanks
Stephen
--
Stephen Hahn, PhD Solaris Kernel Development, Sun Microsystems
[EMAIL PRO
addressing the
> > real contributor
> > issues.
>
> I must have missed it in some previous post but
> what "priority list"?
The list that the opensolaris.org I-team assembles from various inputs
and gives to the team that builds and runs the various bug
publication
* Glynn Foster <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-11-29 20:16]:
> Stephen Hahn wrote:
> > * Cyril Plisko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-11-29 12:35]:
> >> Do we have any estimation on how long will it take
> >> to have a normal b.o.o ? I mean the one that community
&
d kill-off most of the
> spambots (and or use for random-length substrings in the address).
> Additionally you can use an alternative unicode representation to
> confuse the bots further... :-)
> Example code on demand...
I think the injected inert tags idea would work, since it p
e due diligence procedure followed to open the
code of Solaris: because some of the factors are not germane to
OpenSolaris, the process will appear opaque.)
- Stephen
--
Stephen Hahn, PhD Solaris Kernel Development, Sun Microsystems
[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://blogs.sun.com/sch/
___
near to hand.) For
example, I need to get going on
http://bugs.opensolaris.org/view_bug.do?bug_id=6497932
and the b.o.o report actually tells you so.
- Stephen
--
Stephen Hahn, PhD Solaris Kernel Development, Sun Microsystems
[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://blogs.sun.com/sch/
__
?threadID=18348&tstart=0
Anyway, Steve had the rebuild started yesterday afternoon, so I expect
he'll announce resumption imminently...
- Stephen
--
Stephen Hahn, PhD Solaris Kernel Development, Sun Microsystems
[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://blogs.sun.com/sch/
__
've been waiting to get my hands on the performance and
> observability presentation!
I haven't checked the main TechDays site; you can find the slides in
the Marketing Community:
http://www.opensolaris.org/os/community/marketing/events/techdays/seattle/presos/
- Stephen
-
firewall to reach non-Sun hosts.
> Derek and I will get in touch with the team responsible on Monday and
> try to get this resolved. Thanks for letting us know!
It looks like it last reached whacked.net on 26 July, so we can work
back and figure out what configuration change is the problem
//dlc.sun.com/osol/x/downloads/current/
genunix.org mirrors ON at least at
http://www.genunix.org/mirror/index.html
as well as offering a Subversion clone. Details about the Subversion
clone are available at
http://svn.genunix.org/
- Stephen
--
Stephen Hahn, PhD Solaris Ker
bsite code (Java, CSS,
etc.) circulating--for criticism, tweaking, corrections--soonest.
- Stephen
--
Stephen Hahn, PhD Solaris Kernel Development, Sun Microsystems
[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://blogs.sun.com/sch/
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
project would be open source and everything would be made public
> once it starts to work.
See
http://www.opensolaris.org/os/community/onnv/devref_toc/
for build instructions, tools setup, etc.
- Stephen
--
Stephen Hahn, PhD Solaris Kernel Development, Sun Microsystems
[EMAIL PROTECTE
c command or two. I expect that we'll issue another draft once
we have a candidate set of initial commands.
- Stephen
--
Stephen Hahn, PhD Solaris Kernel Development, Sun Microsystems
[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://blogs.sun.com/sch/
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
suit every potential effort build on OpenSolaris technology.
An alternative would be to propose text for the distribution, which
can be added to the Distributions page:
http://www.opensolaris.org/os/about/distributions/
I don't really see any problem with adding a distribution
as a
project name for opensolaris.org; although admittedly much blander, I
suggest "ppc-dev".)
- Stephen
--
Stephen Hahn, PhD Solaris Kernel Development, Sun Microsystems
[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://blogs.sun.com/sch/
___
opensolaris-discus
> some way to allow authorized write access to the common project web
> pages that does not involve special rituals.
Yes. Splitting the editorial and administrative aspects of project
leadership is a planned change.
- Stephen
--
Stephen Ha
st a test locale, called the "Multibyte English
Locale", but I can't seem to find a copy. Perhaps Ienup knows more.
- Stephen
--
Stephen Hahn, PhD Solaris Kernel Development, Sun Microsystems
[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://blogs.sun.com/sch/
__
just
have to have the discussion with the various leads.
Comments on the charter/constitution would best be shared on
cab-discuss, since that's where the Working Group is having its
discussions. You might also look at
http://www.genunix.org/wiki/index.php/Category:Governance
large scale consensus across the
Communities is to be reached, so it's probably worth your time if
you're currently leading or interested in leading a present or future
Community.)
Thanks
Stephen
--
Stephen Hahn, PhD Solaris Kernel Development, Sun Microsystems
[EMAIL
* April Chin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-05-24 12:10]:
> Also, belatedly, I'd also like to add a +1 for creating the
> shell-discuss mailing list.
>
> Just to clarify, the shells my group works on are ksh, csh, and sh (bourne
> shell), but we can include other shells (bash, zsh) in the discussion.
* Al Hopper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-05-05 14:08]:
> Is it possible for an average Joe OpenSolaris Developer to file a bug
> against /usr/bin/mail (and libmail.so) in Solaris 8?
The failure is not reproducible on recent Nevada bits?
--
Stephen Hahn, PhD Solaris Kernel Deve
* John Plocher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-05-03 12:02]:
> Stephen Hahn wrote:
> > A revised proposal has already been made:
> > http://www.opensolaris.org/jive/thread.jspa?messageID=35607謗
>
> This proposal seems to be
>
> Given that the [tags] are uno
Yes/No" item, and leave it to the
> individual to choose the behavior that they want.
>
> This discussion makes it clear that there is no good "one size fits
> all" here. Let's not force one.
A revised proposal has already been made:
http://www.opensolaris.or
* Justin Erenkrantz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-05-02 11:32]:
> On 5/2/06, Stephen Hahn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I would very much like to eliminate the second and subsequent list
> > name inclusions from subject lines. Are there a substantial number of
> &
(One omitted acknowledgment from my mail.)
* Egregious example subject lines were graciously provided by Ian
Collins.
--
Stephen Hahn, PhD Solaris Kernel Development, Sun Microsystems
[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://blogs.sun.com/sch/
___
opensolaris
like to eliminate the second and subsequent list
name inclusions from subject lines. Are there a substantial number of
people filtering on anything other than the first included list name?
(And have done so in an order-of-arrival-neutral fashion?)
- Stephen
--
Stephen Hahn, Ph
* Darren Reed <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-05-01 16:15]:
> Stephen Hahn wrote:
>
> > Over in website-discuss, we've reached consensus that, for the site
> > lists as a whole, the various "[foo-discuss]" tags should not be
> > prepended to subject
* Joerg Schilling <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-05-01 16:03]:
> Stephen Lau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Roland Mainz wrote:
> > > Stephen Hahn wrote:
> > >
> > >> The plan of record for hosting source code is to support Subversion
>
sonable to make one exception if
those mailx(1) users out there feel strongly enough. If no one
cares, then we'll switch them all over the course of tomorrow
afternoon.
- Stephen
--
Stephen Hahn, PhD Solaris Kernel Development, Sun Microsystems
[EMAIL PROTECTED] http
is suitable for either of
opensolaris-code or tools-discuss; potential platforms probably should
start talking here; there are communities and projects associated with
installation and packaging already.)
- Stephen
--
Stephen Hahn, Ph
http://cvs.opensolaris.org/source/xref/on/usr/src/cmd/stat/iostat/iostat.c
and the functions it calls.
- Stephen
--
Stephen Hahn, PhD Solaris Kernel Development, Sun Microsystems
[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://blogs.sun.com/sch/
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
* Jim Grisanzio <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-04-26 17:53]:
> Ok, we're in the Google Summer of Code. Thanks so much for all the
> excellent project ideas, and thanks to Simon Phipps for initiating the
> process to get us involved.
Nice work, Simon and Jim.
- Stephen
__
really requesting that the aliases be deleted?
- Stephen
--
Stephen Hahn, PhD Solaris Kernel Development, Sun Microsystems
[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://blogs.sun.com/sch/
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
ither
- repurpose opensolaris-code, or
- let the discussion run on muskoka-discuss.
Traffic on opensolaris-code has been technical, and can easily sustain
the broadening of role outlined in the thread. Al H and Eric L can take ov
* Eric Boutilier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-04-13 16:36]:
> Stephen Hahn wrote:
> > 2. The macintel alias. Is there any way we could see a proposal for
> > a efi-support project, perhaps endorsed by the Appliance and
> > Laptop communities, that handles t
the most recent requestor(s) for a technical alias speak for themselves
> > as to whether this is sufficient.
>
> This is what I had in mind. Sorry for creating confusion.
Okay, that's resolved: muskoka-discuss. (And I'll keep th
macintel alias. Is there any way we could see a proposal for
a efi-support project, perhaps endorsed by the Appliance and
Laptop communities, that handles the macintel port as a topic?
(And maybe has some pre-integration patches, for the enthusiast?)
Thanks
Stephen
-
or all these developments, I expect website-discuss
and tools-discuss to be the primary mailing lists. Please join in.
As always, please share your concerns; I am happy to receive them
privately or on the list.
- Stephen
--
Stephen Hahn, PhD Solaris Kernel Development, Sun M
* Roland Mainz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-04-09 18:06]:
> Stephen Hahn wrote:
> > The plan of record for hosting source code is to support Subversion
> > and (now) Mercurial as a per-repository choice, so there's no freeze
> > out for projects that believe t
* Holger Berger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-04-07 18:12]:
> On 4/8/06, Al Hopper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Fri, 7 Apr 2006, Stephen Hahn wrote:
> >
> > >
> > > Commentary is encouraged. We can start to look at specific
> > > SCM-depe
submissions received from sponsors that had external code
reviewers today (and subsequent days, too). Is that what you mean?
- Stephen
--
Stephen Hahn, PhD Solaris Kernel Development, Sun Microsystems
[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://blogs.sun.com/sch/
___
basic aspects of submission on a path to
being fully automated. Suggestions for relaxing any particular
nit-picking are encouraged.
- Stephen
--
Stephen Hahn, PhD Solaris Kernel Development, Sun Microsystems
[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://blogs.sun.com/sch/
tant, the mails certainly
> are and should remain accessible somehow.
There is no intention to delete any content from web trees or
email/forum postings.
> regarding to the remotion process, i think it's ok
Cheers
Stephen
--
Stephen Hahn, PhD Solaris Kernel Development, S
1 - 100 of 161 matches
Mail list logo
