Eric Trimble wrote:
>
> When determining what protocol is spoken over a
> physical connection
> between a host controller and a drive (or other
> peripheral), you look
> for the highest common denominator - thus, a 2.0
> controller will speak
> 2.0 when talking to a 3.0 peripheral, but will spe
On Tue, Feb 16, 2010 at 4:08 PM, Maxim Kartashev
wrote:
> While waiting for that package update, I guess one could just unpack SVR4
> package patch and replace binaries by hand; after all, Sun Studio patches
> are just archives with files and directories in them. It's a lousy
> workaround, but it
>
> Yeah, unfortunately it seems that with Sun's large
> operating expenses, headcount, and poor sales that
> continuing to operate will be rather tricky. To make
> matters worse, in this economy most businesses are
> dependent on credit for doing things like pay-roll as
> the income can vary each
>
> Yeah, unfortunately it seems that with Sun's large
> operating expenses, headcount, and poor sales that
> continuing to operate will be rather tricky. To make
> matters worse, in this economy most businesses are
> dependent on credit for doing things like pay-roll as
> the income can vary each
> On May 12, 2008, at 9:24 AM, Omer Faruk Sen wrote:
>
> > Is it possible to upgrade obp without having an
> Operating system
> > installed on a Sparc hardware. I have read that (on
> different forums)
> > it is not possible. But maybe there is a way for
> that? Maybe having a
> > bootable live cd
> Took /opt/csw/lib out of my LD_LIBRARY_PATH and it
> now works.
>
> Blastwave is great but it often clobbers
> functionality.
Blastwave doesn't clobber functionality. Unawareness clobbers
functionality. What are you doing with a LD_LIBRARY_PATH on
Solaris.
Here's a good read why LD_LIBRARY_
> I have installed the Qemu binary package, the Kqemu
> and managed to get Win2K installed. It is possible to
> access the internet via the default DHCP
> configuration. Unfortunately I need to reconfigure
> Qemu so that it is assigned an IP address in the same
> network as the Solaris 10 8/07 host
> > I currently maintain the QEMU port for the
> > OpenSolaris project, and have also
> > been dabbling in Wine for 6 or 7 months. I
> monitor
> > the Wine-devel list and
> > test the builds after a release or two. I've been
> > talking to a few other folks off
> > line about wine, and know that
> Ben Taylor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > > John Tracy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >
> > > > If something else can get the job done well,
> I'm
> > > not averse to using it. But it appears at moment
> I
> > >
I currently maintain the QEMU port for the OpenSolaris project, and have also
been dabbling in Wine for 6 or 7 months. I monitor the Wine-devel list and
test the builds after a release or two. I've been talking to a few other folks
off
line about wine, and know that there are several other folks
> John Tracy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > If something else can get the job done well, I'm
> not averse to using it. But it appears at moment I
> have no way to access or otherwise using punchin.
> Furthermore, does it work with the existing Cisco
> based VPN server deployments that are alread
> > Oh, you mean I shouldn't compile any of my own code
> > on my own system cause I might have to rm -rf it instead of
> > builiding a package every time. I'm really sure the new
> > users we are catering too are just *gonna* love that.
> > Course, packaging for Solaris is quite a bit of mag
> > Course, it would help if there was a locate command on Solaris,
>
> Dear Sir,
> if you need to use the `locate` command to find
> something, you have a MUCH bigger problem.
Dude
I know more ways to find stuff than I can count. I'm only recanting
the whines from folks who claim that more tha
> James C. McPherson wrote:
> > frank wang wrote:
> >> Sun will keep two universes, 1 is "Linux" alike,
> >> the other "Solaris" alike. User can just pick what
> >> they like or are familiar with. But it
> >> can't replace the efforts to scale the train
> >> coverage on everyting about
> >> Solari
> James C. McPherson wrote:
> > frank wang wrote:
> >> Sun will keep two universes, 1 is "Linux" alike,
> >> the other "Solaris" alike. User can just pick what
> >> they like or are familiar with. But it
> >> can't replace the efforts to scale the train
> >> coverage on everyting about
> >> Solari
> Jerry Gardner wrote:
> > I installed Firefox using Blastwave ("pkg-get -i
> firefox") and it broke the Java Desktop System.
> >
> > When I try to log in now, I get the initial JDS
> splash screen for a few seconds, and then it goes
> immediately back to the login screen. CDE works fine.
> >
> >
> The ARC Cases for the WebStack NG Project have been
> submitted for review (and hopefully approval), and i would
> like to ask our community's input regarding two important
> questions which have come up during our discussions:
>
> 1. Should the initial components released for this projec
> I have attached the current output of "prtconf -pv"
> for the notebook ze5375 (HP Pavillion).
I used the frkit on my ze4100 and it worked fine (well,
until the card died).
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing lis
> Joerg Schilling wrote:
>
> >Mika Borner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> >>Innobox announced today, that their virtualisation
> solution will be released under GPL.
> >>
> >>http://www.virtualbox.org/wiki/News
> >>
> >>There is no support for OpenSolaris X86 yet, but I
> guess porting
19 matches
Mail list logo
