This looks remarkably like bug
6883815 device-discovery/printers:snmp always goes into maintenance
which has the following workaround
# pfexec pkg install SUNWnet-snmp-core
# pfexec patch -b /etc/dbus-1/system.d/hal.conf <
+
EOF
If you are using CUPS as your defaul
This is very true. At the same time there has to be a fine balance between
operations and engineering support. Products should be easy enough for
operations to get the day-to-day work accomplished, but have enough flexibility
and control for experts to get under the hood for tuning and troublesh
Dear all,
I am having a problem getting my snmp service online, it keeps appearing in
maintenance even when I restart and stop it. I can't figure out what it is,
see my log. Please advise. Thank you.
--
[...]
> At the end of the day, it probably makes sense for
> Oracle to focus on the mid-range to high-end for
> SPARC. If Oracle can make Containers, LDoms, and DSDs
> as easy to manage as VMware.. that could change the
> game. Making all this great technology more
> accessible will help grow busin
As the professional cd key online store.
We provide full Making History 2: War of the World serial
All keys are 100% valid and unique - you'll be the only one with the key.
You can find it from here:
http://www.1cdkey.com/making-history-2-war-of-the-world-serial
http://www.1cdkey.com/warhammer-dark
Speaking from an HPC perspective, it is interesting how the market shifted
years ago. I remember when most HPC shops were buy Alphas, SGI's, and Crays
with distaste for x86. While those platforms were more expensive, the reality
is that they took up less space and complexity. For example, 5 x qu
On 06/ 2/10 08:49 AM, Xavier Beaudouin wrote:
Hello,
I had some woes about OpenSolaris and SCSI support.
I had on my desk a 2940, the band old reference that works "everywhere" but
not on OpenSolaris.
That card only has a 32 bit driver in Solaris.
I have difficulties to find an HCL
Hello,
I had some woes about OpenSolaris and SCSI support.
I had on my desk a 2940, the band old reference that works "everywhere" but
not on OpenSolaris.
I have difficulties to find an HCL about SCSI supported cards and models, and
since I have a JBOD with 12 300GB HD, it will be a shame
On 06/ 1/10 11:59 PM, Edward Martinez wrote:
I just read AMD opterons and Linux is powering the worlds fastest
supercomputer. If the x86 platform and Linux now has the capacity to produce
this type of results, where does this leave Power and SPARC platfroms?
http://www.marketwatch.com/story/
On 06/ 1/10 10:20 AM, Erik Trimble wrote:
On 6/1/2010 9:19 AM, Shawn Walker wrote:
On 06/ 1/10 05:39 AM, Brandon Hume wrote:
On Mon, 2010-05-31 at 20:22 -0700, lance tan wrote:
When I login to osol from another host in the LAN, obviously, the
DNS server couldn't reverse resolve the IP inside t
>Shawn - just change the "hosts" line of /etc/nsswitch.conf to be:
>hosts: files dns
I wonder why this is not the default setting. I had to apply exactly this
change in order to just surf the web.
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
openso
The market for supercomputers is vastly different than the commercial market.
Even though Linux is used on supercomputers, it isn't an off-the-shelf version
that companies purchase from Red Hat or Novell to run commercial applications.
There is also truth in what Octave mentioned in the supply
On 6/1/2010 9:19 AM, Shawn Walker wrote:
On 06/ 1/10 05:39 AM, Brandon Hume wrote:
On Mon, 2010-05-31 at 20:22 -0700, lance tan wrote:
When I login to osol from another host in the LAN, obviously, the
DNS server couldn't reverse resolve the IP inside the LAN. But there
is no way to disable DNS
On Sun, May 30, 2010 at 7:03 AM, Erik Trimble wrote:
>
>
> End-of-fiscal-year is May 31 at Oracle, so I (wish/think/hope/assume) we're
> due for a flurry of announcements come June 1.
Erik,
Is it June 1, 2010 ?
Sorry couldn't help it...
--
Regards,
Cyril
On 06/ 1/10 05:39 AM, Brandon Hume wrote:
On Mon, 2010-05-31 at 20:22 -0700, lance tan wrote:
When I login to osol from another host in the LAN, obviously, the DNS server
couldn't reverse resolve the IP inside the LAN. But there is no way to disable
DNS reverse lookup by SunSSH.
No, but you
On Tue, Jun 1, 2010 at 8:33 AM, Oscar del Rio wrote:
> Solaris achieved a world record TPC-H 3 TB non-clustered performance result
> of 188,229.9 q...@3000gb with a price of $20.19/q...@3000gb."
Translated :
for $3,800,361.60 you can buy a lot of whatever you want, including
benchmark prizes
On 06/ 1/10 07:59 AM, Edward Martinez wrote:
I just read AMD opterons and Linux is powering the worlds fastest
supercomputer. If the x86 platform and Linux now has the capacity to produce
this type of results, where does this leave Power and SPARC platfroms?
http://sun.systemnews.com
Hi,
I don't think people should fly off the handle and think that Solaris or AIX
are going away. The Gartner and IDC numbers about about units sold in a
quarter. The reality is that even with the UltraSPARC T-Series servers, you
don't have to buy as many servers as you use to in order to get th
On Mon, 31 May 2010 20:22:39 PDT, lance tan wrote:
> I am using DNS. My DNS server is my Wireless Router, actually it is just
a
> proxy, it forwards DNS messages to ISP's DNS server. When I login to
osol
> from another host in the LAN, obviously, the DNS server couldn't reverse
> resolve the IP in
On Mon, 2010-05-31 at 20:22 -0700, lance tan wrote:
> When I login to osol from another host in the LAN, obviously, the DNS server
> couldn't reverse resolve the IP inside the LAN. But there is no way to
> disable DNS reverse lookup by SunSSH.
No, but you can trick it. Toss the IPs in question
Brandon High wrote:
On Sun, May 30, 2010 at 1:06 PM, John Ryan wrote:
Why not CIFS then? - It's streaks ahead of Samba
Samba has some advantages, such as the ability to act as domain
controller or AD master. The native cifs server certainly wins on
performance, support for VSS and ACLs.
As w
>
> http://www.theregister.co.uk/2010/05/27/idc_q1_2010_se
> rver_nums/
>
> Which if read in context did not say that Solaris,
> HP-UX or AIX were frozen,
> just that *if* that happened, then Linux would gain
> more market share.
>
> The non-misleading in-context quote is:
>
> It is hard to imag
On 01.06.2010 05:42, Alan Coopersmith wrote:
> Edward Martinez wrote:
>>> I don't know where you got the idea that IBM has
>>> frozen development of the POWER architecture
>>
>> I was quoting the article. i think it's mention in the eightieth
>> paragraph
>>
>> the link to the article:
>> htt
23 matches
Mail list logo
