Just out of curiosity are there defects raised against the issues you've
raised here? I have searche3d and can not find them in
http://defect.opensolaris.org/
On Wed, Nov 25, 2009 at 12:32, paul wrote:
> Shawn Walker schrieb:
>
> Chad Welsh wrote:
>>
>>> I guess truth does = rude to people who
> Perhaps if you said how many drives you want and
> such? It's hard to give good recommendations when we
> don't know exactly what you're after.
Sorry - I posted in zfs discuss also. What I want is
a single- or double-failure tolerant network attached
file server. I'm willing to build a system a
We hope to have the IPS version up in the next day or so. I don't think
you would want to manually download and install the tarballs from the
virtualbox.org website, since you would first have to uninstall the IPS
version, then uninstall the tarball when you switch back to the IPS
version. I wo
Hi:
I have not been able to upgrade my virtualbox 3.0.12 because the IPS version
has not been made available through the sun extra repository. Is there any way
I can do a manual upgrade from my existing IPS package?
Thanks,
Keith
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
_
Thanks.
The console reported "-m" as an invalid option, but you got me looking in the
right area.
Important changes:
- change console from graphics to text
- delete line containing splash graphic.
Now to try and resolve the actual boot issues.
First, the boot archive didn't math (fix with 'boo
Shawn Walker schrieb:
Chad Welsh wrote:
I guess truth does = rude to people who are blind to it and can or
will not see the light of it. Most people here will agree that
opensloaris has headed down the wrong path, many will not say in
public but there are those that have and that still will sa
Chad Welsh wrote:
I guess truth does = rude to people who are blind to it and can or will not see
the light of it. Most people here will agree that opensloaris has headed down
the wrong path, many will not say in public but there are those that have and
that still will say that SX:CE is the wa
I guess truth does = rude to people who are blind to it and can or will not see
the light of it. Most people here will agree that opensloaris has headed down
the wrong path, many will not say in public but there are those that have and
that still will say that SX:CE is the way of the future and
I think its more like when people see rudeness like you've displayed they
don't want to help
On Wed, Nov 25, 2009 at 01:27, Chad Welsh wrote:
> I guess when people don't like the truth they stop helping no matter, huh?
> Well you all have a fun time with Sol-nux and stay in your yummy gummy drea
On Wed, 25 Nov 2009 00:14:52 +0100, Shawn Walker
wrote:
It has been discussed, but I don't know when or if it might be
implemented.
Clear, has taken into consideration.
As for SUNWgnome-help-viewer, I suspect its a dependency of some
package SUNWfirefox depends on and not of SUNWfirefo
Chad Welsh wrote:
Y instead of a linux-solaris bastardization.
Great good name for what Solaris is becoming :)
Thanks for your fantasy
Salut
Alex
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Viktor Cemasko wrote:
On Tue, 24 Nov 2009 23:39:22 +0100, Shawn Walker
wrote:
It is "upward" through the dependencies of the package you named.
SUNWfirefox is not a dependency of SUNWgnome-help-viewer and is
therefore not listed.
Bingo. We come closer to what I want(ed) and trying to expre
On Tue, 24 Nov 2009 23:39:22 +0100, Shawn Walker
wrote:
It is "upward" through the dependencies of the package you named.
SUNWfirefox is not a dependency of SUNWgnome-help-viewer and is
therefore not listed.
Bingo. We come closer to what I want(ed) and trying to express/explain
with my
Viktor Cemasko wrote:
On Tue, 24 Nov 2009 22:41:21 +0100, Shawn Walker
wrote:
As I already said, -r does what you said for --upward. Look at the
output of 'uninstall -nrv'.
I am sure You already mistook only because of my bad explanation.
~%=> pfexec pkg uninstall -nrv
SUNWfirefox
On Tue, 24 Nov 2009 22:41:21 +0100, Shawn Walker
wrote:
As I already said, -r does what you said for --upward. Look at the
output of 'uninstall -nrv'.
I am sure You already mistook only because of my bad explanation.
~%=> pfexec pkg uninstall -nrv
SUNWfirefox
Viktor Cemasko wrote:
Greetings Erik,
On Tue, 24 Nov 2009 21:56:14 +0100, Shawn Walker
wrote:
...
In short, the way the OpenSolaris distribution is currently built
pretty much requires SUNWfirefox if you want to use the included GNOME.
I understand Your position in this question. My Engli
Greetings Erik,
On Tue, 24 Nov 2009 21:56:14 +0100, Shawn Walker
wrote:
...
In short, the way the OpenSolaris distribution is currently built pretty
much requires SUNWfirefox if you want to use the included GNOME.
I understand Your position in this question. My English is not enough to
Viktor Cemasko wrote:
Greetings Erik,
On Tue, 24 Nov 2009 21:08:05 +0100, Shawn Walker wrote:
Viktor Cemasko wrote:
...
--forceForce the (un)install of a package.
This was purposefully omitted. Your system couldn't be properly
upgraded if this was supported.
With sn
Greetings Erik,
On Tue, 24 Nov 2009 21:08:05 +0100, Shawn Walker wrote:
Viktor Cemasko wrote:
...
--forceForce the (un)install of a package.
This was purposefully omitted. Your system couldn't be properly
upgraded if this was supported.
With snapshot possibility I c
Viktor Cemasko wrote:
Greetings Erik,
On Tue, 24 Nov 2009 19:55:56 +0100, Erik Trimble wrote:
Aside from the sporadic download issues, exactly what else seems wrong
with ips?
First sorry for my English.
I miss some options when (un)install packege(s) like these:
-f
--force
Greetings Erik,
On Tue, 24 Nov 2009 19:55:56 +0100, Erik Trimble wrote:
Aside from the sporadic download issues, exactly what else seems wrong
with ips?
First sorry for my English.
I miss some options when (un)install packege(s) like these:
-f
--force Force the
Unlike some, I find IPS to be usable, but that doesn't change the fact that it
was lunacy to implement a packaging system in an interpreted language.
[url=http://www.haskell.org/haskellwiki/Haskell]Haskell[/url] would have been a
much better choice. The [url=http://xmonad.org/]Xmonad window mana
On Tue, Nov 24, 2009 at 6:27 AM, Chad Welsh wrote:
> I guess when people don't like the truth they stop helping no matter, huh?
> Well you all have a fun time with Sol-nux and stay in your yummy gummy dream
> world while us true believers stomp the turf with the tried and true heavy
> metal hit
Tomas Bodzar wrote:
It works, but it doesn't mean that it works well. Don't know why Sun decided to
reinvent wheel (the most stupid idea in Unix world opposite to K.I.S.S.). There
is pkgsrc available for Solaris or there are packaging systems from OpenBSD,
FreeBSD, ... with good licence.
Be
* Chad Welsh [2009-11-24 04:58]:
> I guess there is a limit to how much you can update at one time when
> using Opensloaris 1002 b127 or any other Opensloaris version?
There is no limit imposed, either by the client or the server.
> If I try to install large packages like Openoffice, Java 7 ru
* Haiou Fu (Kevin) [2009-11-20 15:50]:
> You nailed it, it is an x86 version, while I am on SPARC:
>
> r...@osol:/# file /usr/bin/netperf
> /usr/bin/netperf: ELF 32-bit LSB executable 80386 Version 1 [FPU],
> dynamically linked, not stripped
>
> The question is:
> (2) Why IPS (netperf.p5i
It works, but it doesn't mean that it works well. Don't know why Sun decided to
reinvent wheel (the most stupid idea in Unix world opposite to K.I.S.S.). There
is pkgsrc available for Solaris or there are packaging systems from OpenBSD,
FreeBSD, ... with good licence.
--
This message posted fro
I've never used the older package system, OpenSolaris 2009.06 was my first try
on Solaris as an admin. I've had no problems with the package system though. It
works well for me. I've done image-updates when I needed to download close to a
gig and it gets them all and installs them all without is
Travis Tabbal wrote:
7) Opteron AMD PowerNow! frequency scaling does not
work, which is a real pain in the neck, I hope that
this will be fixed in future releases. So much for
global warming, looks like the americans still do not
care.
Current AMD chips DO support power/frequency scaling
> Thanks! That's quite a useful bit of info, much like
> what
> I'd hoped for out of the HCL. I'd decided that ASUS
> had
> reliable-enough motherboards, AMD processors were
> certainly usable and all support ECC. But the issues
> with
> the on-board ethernet chips and the disk controllers
> were
> 7) Opteron AMD PowerNow! frequency scaling does not
> work, which is a real pain in the neck, I hope that
> this will be fixed in future releases. So much for
> global warming, looks like the americans still do not
> care.
Current AMD chips DO support power/frequency scaling in OpenSolaris. I
>[...]
> my own *nix machine for a couple of years. I
> regularly build machines from parts and an assortment
> of corpses found in the workshop. I'm familiar with
> OS's and hardware from user level right down to the
> bare metal. But I don't do this every day, and I have
> [...]
I have a few tip
The switch is unmanaged, so I can't set anything. But I will try another switch
and see if it makes a difference. The change I made was simply set the pcie
variable based on the capability and then comment out the trigger function
invocation in the send function. So, it goes through the whole lo
Something in xwiki also often crashes my IE7 and NO I cannot upgrade because I
have a corporate build on my laptop.
I adopted xwiki too for my personal wiki long time ago and cursed the time
since. Extremely heavy on Java, extremely convoluted code. Deisgned for
technical masturbation, not seri
Chad Welsh wrote:
I guess there is a limit to how much you can update at one time when using
Opensloaris 1002 b127 or any other Opensloaris version? If I try to install
large packages like Openoffice, Java 7 runtime or I figure anything over 10MB
or so the Package Manager fails to download the
Moinak Ghosh wrote:
On Tue, Nov 24, 2009 at 9:40 PM, Brian Cameron wrote:
Ken:
I just tried the "OSOL 2008.11 and higher" client. I didn't have a
Second Life account, so I created one at their website.
Then, when I try to use the client, I enter my username and password
and click the "Connec
On Tue, Nov 24, 2009 at 9:40 PM, Brian Cameron wrote:
>
> Ken:
>
> I just tried the "OSOL 2008.11 and higher" client. I didn't have a
> Second Life account, so I created one at their website.
>
> Then, when I try to use the client, I enter my username and password
> and click the "Connect" button
Ken:
I just tried the "OSOL 2008.11 and higher" client. I didn't have a
Second Life account, so I created one at their website.
Then, when I try to use the client, I enter my username and password
and click the "Connect" button. A dialog appears saying "Terms of
Service Agreement - Please rea
Here you go and thanks to Dana Fagerstrom's hard work in porting the Second
Life viewer to Sun Solaris/OpenSolaris:
x86 Binaries:
OSOL 2008.11 and higher
https://solaris-sl-viewer.s3.amazonaws.com/SecondLife_i686_1_20_17_1640-2009Jan07-snv.pkg.bz2
Solaris 10u3 and higher:
https://solaris-sl-vie
Nexenta.org
2009/11/24 Chad Welsh
> I guess when people don't like the truth they stop helping no matter, huh?
> Well you all have a fun time with Sol-nux and stay in your yummy gummy dream
> world while us true believers stomp the turf with the tried and true heavy
> metal hitter solaris 10 and
Well they need to fix the IPS issues that are all around and they might get
someone to pay,b ut until that part is rock solid like other pay for Operating
Systems they will be hard pressed to get consumer financial
support!
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
I guess when people don't like the truth they stop helping no matter, huh? Well
you all have a fun time with Sol-nux and stay in your yummy gummy dream world
while us true believers stomp the turf with the tried and true heavy metal
hitter solaris 10 and its Step brother that is beaten to death
> Title:
> Opensolaris releases unsecure by default, or:
> Why are Opensolaris stable 2009.06 users forced to
> pay for security updates?
If it were a company of fat cats I would have a problem too, but Sun, unlike
its many competitors, has instead contributed a great deal to the community
witho
On Tue, 24 Nov 2009, Vikash Tulsiyan wrote:
AFAIK IPS packages can only be directly installed from a remote server. Is
there any way i can download a package and install it later on my box . If not,
is there any RFE for the same?
It hasn't been implemented yet.
All you can do now is to s
Hi,
On Tue, Nov 24, 2009 at 5:18 PM, Vikash Tulsiyan
wrote:
> AFAIK IPS packages can only be directly installed from a remote server. Is
> there any way i can download a package and install it later on my box . If
> not, is there any RFE for the same?
Afaik and as of now you can't download IPS
AFAIK IPS packages can only be directly installed from a remote server. Is
there any way i can download a package and install it later on my box . If not,
is there any RFE for the same?
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discus
They tried cleaning up the site abit but made it harder to find things to those
of us that were used to the old site and they have not given any insight on how
they arranged things. It only works for those that have only a need for their
specific haunts.
--
This message posted from opensolaris.
> I made some progress understanding the behavior but I
> am nowhere close to a solution. Any suggestions would
> be welcome.
>
> First of all, I think the fix in snv_127 for the PCIe
> cards does not address the real issue. It simply
> slows down transmission to the point where the bug
> doesn't
Is it just me or the OpenSolaris site is hard to search and browse through?
For example, I am looking for information on Brandz, left navigation pane has
nothing. Run a search for brandz in the search field above, and I find a number
of disconnected finds, hard to tell if they are relevant to wh
Hi,
Constantin's blog does come perilously close to being an AMD reference
design, and could easily be turned into a useful one according to my internal
metrics. About the only things that turned me away from plunging in and
replicating it are that - I had a hard time finding an ASUS M3A78-CM a
set the variable and I still cannot finish an update. I cannot believe that you
plan to replace solaris with this crap! You should
have stuck with JDS R2 instead of a linux-solaris bastardization. At least I
could get updates with JDS R2 before the repositories were
Hello all,
I have used Linux for many years, but I am new to Unix. Please forgive what I
am sure is a problem with a simple solution.
In the gnome terminal emulator, I am able to use the arrow keys to move about
the line, but using control+left arrow or control+right arrow does not advance
an
Well I guess if the service is supposed to work it would have had that setting
already enabled. Hell I hate the living crap out of windows but its update
service is significantly more reliable out of the box than this, hell even
solaris 10 update manager is more reliable and efficient. But I gue
53 matches
Mail list logo
