On 24/03/07, Martin Bochnig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Cyril Plisko wrote:
>
> I just downloaded b60 from here
>
http://javashoplm.sun.com/ECom/docs/Welcome.jsp?StoreId=7&PartDetailId=Sol-Express_b60-x86-SP-G-B&TransactionId=try
>
>
Those are the CD iso's, are the DVD iso parts also available
On 3/24/07, Martin Bochnig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Cyril Plisko wrote:
>
> I just downloaded b60 from here
>
http://javashoplm.sun.com/ECom/docs/Welcome.jsp?StoreId=7&PartDetailId=Sol-Express_b60-x86-SP-G-B&TransactionId=try
>
>
Those are the CD iso's, are the DVD iso parts also available f
Cyril Plisko wrote:
I just downloaded b60 from here
http://javashoplm.sun.com/ECom/docs/Welcome.jsp?StoreId=7&PartDetailId=Sol-Express_b60-x86-SP-G-B&TransactionId=try
Those are the CD iso's, are the DVD iso parts also available from above
location (I cannot see one, needed the original
Cyril Plisko wrote:
I just downloaded b60 from here
http://javashoplm.sun.com/ECom/docs/Welcome.jsp?StoreId=7&PartDetailId=Sol-Express_b60-x86-SP-G-B&TransactionId=try
Awesome Cyril, thanks for the pointer
--
Martin
___
opensolaris-discuss mai
Shawn Walker wrote:
On 24/03/07, Moinak Ghosh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
UNIX admin wrote:
>> One thing I noticed is that the HW platform described
>> only has 256MB of memory. When I tried to install an
>> OpenSolaris build the other day on a machine with
>> 512MB, the install failed due to
On 24/03/07, Moinak Ghosh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
UNIX admin wrote:
>> One thing I noticed is that the HW platform described
>> only has 256MB of memory. When I tried to install an
>> OpenSolaris build the other day on a machine with
>> 512MB, the install failed due to my machine not
>> havin
On 24/03/07, Cyril Plisko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 3/24/07, Shawn Walker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 23/03/07, Horvath <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I should correct myself. Where can I get the dvd iso images of b60 or b61?
I thought the iso's would be updated every other friday but wh
On 3/24/07, Shawn Walker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 23/03/07, Horvath <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I should correct myself. Where can I get the dvd iso images of b60 or b61? I
thought the iso's would be updated every other friday but when I checked the web
site I saw only b59 there.
>
They
UNIX admin wrote:
One thing I noticed is that the HW platform described
only has 256MB of memory. When I tried to install an
OpenSolaris build the other day on a machine with
512MB, the install failed due to my machine not
having enough memory - wanted 796MB or some such.
I always install
On 23/03/07, Horvath <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I should correct myself. Where can I get the dvd iso images of b60 or b61? I
thought the iso's would be updated every other friday but when I checked the
web site I saw only b59 there.
They are not necessarily updated every other Friday. It dep
I should correct myself. Where can I get the dvd iso images of b60 or b61? I
thought the iso's would be updated every other friday but when I checked the
web site I saw only b59 there.
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss
On 23/03/07, Brian Nitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Shawn Walker wrote:
>
> Your manpath probably isn't set correctly. The default manpath for
> Solaris does *not* include all of the man directories for all
> installed software; it is up to you set it appropriately.
>
> Setting your manpath to inc
> Strictly conformant to the above would therefore be:
>
> #define dirfd(dp) ((dp) ? (dp)->dd_fd : -1)
>
> You'd still crash if you pass an invalid pointer,
> though.
Regardless of one's opinion on checks for NULL args, as a macro,
that's bad, with multiple references to the arg on
>int fd;
>DIR *dp;
>
>if ((fd=dirfd(dp=opendir("/my/dir"))) == -1) {
>/*fail*/
>}
Well, this code cannot tell the difference between "this implementation
does not use file descriptors for directory streams" and "directory
stream open failed".
Casper
> Will they really go for that ?
>
> I mean, the explicit "NULL exception" is one thing,
> but claiming that the
> function may not crash for any random pointer passed
> in, but return EINVAL
> instead, forces either a system call (to error out on
> copyin() failure) or
> a horrid "check agains
There is nothing published but there are two leaf drivers now in OpenSolaris
that you may look to for examples: bge and mpt (this one is a recent addition
and I'm not sure if the changes have made their to OS yet).
Cindi
This message posted from opensolaris.org
__
> One thing I noticed is that the HW platform described
> only has 256MB of memory. When I tried to install an
> OpenSolaris build the other day on a machine with
> 512MB, the install failed due to my machine not
> having enough memory - wanted 796MB or some such.
I always install Solaris in text
Erast Benson wrote:
So, could we assume that NWS now will not be delivered as a separated
tarball and will be part of ON tarball?
Or this is just an effort to get dedicated web page on opensolaris.org?
Erast,
You ask a good question. It isn't aimed as much to get a new project
page in or
Hi,
Alan DuBoff pÃÅ¡e v pá 23. 03. 2007 v 12:12 -0700:
> On Friday 23 March 2007 01:00 am, Eric Enright wrote:
> > Indeed.
> >
> > Several months ago a friend of mine running Debian did an `apt-get
> > dist-upgrade'. Among other things, it upgraded apache2 and squid to
> > newer versions, which
So, could we assume that NWS now will not be delivered as a separated
tarball and will be part of ON tarball?
Or this is just an effort to get dedicated web page on opensolaris.org?
On Fri, 2007-03-23 at 10:19 -0700, John Forte wrote:
> The NWS project consists of drivers, libraries and utilities
On 3/23/07, John Forte <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
The NWS project consists of drivers, libraries and utilities in support of
storage interconnect technologies including both Fibre Channel and iSCSI.
The NWS project source code has been available since 2/06, however, the project
does not have i
Thanks Cindi.
I assume the to be released document will detail how a leaf driver can register
its callback to the nexus driver/framework. Is it correct ?
Or is there any current published document that talks about the callback
registration ?
Thanks.
This message posted from opensolaris.org
_
On Thursday 22 March 2007 10:15 pm, Horvath wrote:
> How to update to Nevada b60 ?
I would start by having the media.
Then I would boot it on the machine, and select the upgrade option instead of
a new install.
--
Alan DuBoff - Solaris x86 Engineering - IHV/OEM Group
Advocate of insourcing at
On Friday 23 March 2007 01:00 am, Eric Enright wrote:
> Indeed.
>
> Several months ago a friend of mine running Debian did an `apt-get
> dist-upgrade'. Among other things, it upgraded apache2 and squid to
> newer versions, which took advantage of epoll().
>
> epoll() is only available in Linux 2.6
John Forte wrote:
The NWS project consists of drivers, libraries and utilities in support of
storage interconnect technologies including both Fibre Channel and iSCSI.
The NWS project source code has been available since 2/06, however, the project
does not have its own project page but rather e
You might want to look at the way the GNOME community handles
elections. I thought that was pretty straightforward.
Dennis Clarke wrote:
I'll try not to muddle things further, but the "Review your contributor
grants" section of the poll instructions and relevant sections of the
draft constitut
Shawn Walker wrote:
Your manpath probably isn't set correctly. The default manpath for
Solaris does *not* include all of the man directories for all
installed software; it is up to you set it appropriately.
Setting your manpath to include /usr/sfw/man, /opt/SUNWspro/man, etc.
would probably all
> I'll try not to muddle things further, but the "Review your contributor
> grants" section of the poll instructions and relevant sections of the
> draft constitution could be made more specific to this election:
> http://opensolaris.org/os/project/website/poll_instructions
>
> In simple terms, if
The short answer is Yes. The long answer is Solaris has a IO Fault Services
framework as part of our Fault Management Architecture (FMA) that allows nexus
and leaf driver to actively participate in error handling and notification.
Implementations for IO Fault Services are available on for sun4
I'll try not to muddle things further, but the "Review your contributor
grants" section of the poll instructions and relevant sections of the
draft constitution could be made more specific to this election:
http://opensolaris.org/os/project/website/poll_instructions
In simple terms, if you ar
Is there a mechanism to pass PCIe AER from PCI nexus driver to leaf driver ?
PCIe AER driver in Linux has a PCI error recovery callback to notify AER to
endpoint device driver. Does Solaris have similar infrastructure ?
Thanks.
This message posted from opensolaris.org
The NWS project consists of drivers, libraries and utilities in support of
storage interconnect technologies including both Fibre Channel and iSCSI.
The NWS project source code has been available since 2/06, however, the project
does not have its own project page but rather exists as part of the
I've been long interested in reducing Solaris's footprint. This wasn't
possible with the monolithic "Solaris" distribution, just as it isn't
possible to install RHEL4 onto a mobile phone. But Nexenta and Belenix
both have a smaller footprint than Sun's server focused distribution and
of you w
On Fri, 23 Mar 2007, UNIX admin wrote:
> That works too, although over time, you'll have lots of config dirs in
> /etc/opt/.
True...
> I deliver all my config stuff in /etc/opt/my-stock-symbol/ and then,
> if the app has more than two config files, in
> /etc/opt/my-stock-symbol/app, for example
Hello John,
Friday, March 23, 2007, 5:10:34 PM, you wrote:
JC> You can still show the value of containers with 512MB RAM (although you
JC> may want to disable the desktop UI if RAM becomes too big an issue).
JC> I've done 3 (sparse) zones in 512MB RAM with no issues.
JC> One of the primary bene
You can still show the value of containers with 512MB RAM (although you
may want to disable the desktop UI if RAM becomes too big an issue).
I've done 3 (sparse) zones in 512MB RAM with no issues.
One of the primary benefits of Containers is delegated administration.
Think of a company providi
Hello forum users,
I am finishing computer science studies this year and I need to create thesis.
I'm interested in Solaris containers and would like to describe this
technology. I want to create a project that uses containers to do “something
useful” and provides some functionality, not only s
On Thu, 22 Mar 2007, eric wang wrote:
Thanks!!
More information:
Hi, All,
Here is the pstack information from dbx.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) terminated by signal SEGV (access to
address exceeded protections)
0xfd90b258: _lock_try_adaptive : ldstub [%o0 + 12], %o1
(dbx) w
Stewart, David C wrote:
I can ask around and see if there is an opportunity here for Solaris as well.
Believe the classmate PC has been going on long before the Sun-Intel alliance.
One thing I noticed is that the HW platform described only has 256MB of memory.
When I tried to install an Open
On 3/23/07, Stewart, David C <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I can ask around and see if there is an opportunity here for Solaris as well.
Believe the classmate PC has been going on long before the Sun-Intel alliance.
One thing I noticed is that the HW platform described only has 256MB of memory.
>Is this just a packaging issue? Can Solaris run on "small" machines?=
> Are there implementations which run on really tiny things like cell=
> phones and the like?
GUI installer issue.
Casper
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss
I can ask around and see if there is an opportunity here for Solaris as well.
Believe the classmate PC has been going on long before the Sun-Intel alliance.
One thing I noticed is that the HW platform described only has 256MB of memory.
When I tried to install an OpenSolaris build the other da
UNIX admin wrote:
These ARC cases are for integration to Solaris, so
/opt is inappropriate,
and /usr is correct.
I missed that, ouch. In that case, apologies for the /opt questions. I was
under the *wrong* impression that CoolStack (NG) was delivered separately of
Solaris. Live and learn...
UNIX admin writes:
> > I never liked the /etc/opt/apache2, and so on that
> > some distributions
> > did as sometimes it wasn't clear which apache2 read
> > what configuration
> > from where, it also made greps by lazy admins (like
> > me) painful ;)
>
> /etc/opt//apache2/ is the clean and correct
Please do NOT reply to this address. If you have any problems, feel free
to send email to desktop dash discuss at opensolaris dot org
Firefox 2.0.0.3 contrib. builds on Solaris10, Solaris8/9 are now
available on www.mozilla.com
What's New
===
http://www.mozilla.com/en-US/firefox/2.0.0.
Frank Hofmann writes:
> On Thu, 22 Mar 2007, Richard L. Hamilton wrote:
> > The dirfd( ) function may fail if:
> > [EINVAL] The dirp argument does not refer to a valid directory stream.
>
> Will they really go for that ?
>
> I mean, the explicit "NULL exception" is one thing, but claiming that th
Horvath writes:
> How to update to Nevada b60 ?
Assuming you have build 60 available, there are several ways to go
about it. Here are three:
- Boot from an snv_60 DVD. This is very slow and requires your
system to be down while the upgrade is happening, but it works.
- Use lofiadm to c
Hi,
before it is too late and children will be infiltrated by MS
software anywhere on the world, we need Solaris in the
Intel competitive HW made against the One Laptop per Child
initative.
http://www.classmatepc.com/classmatepc-system-hardware.html
Jörg
--
EMail:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (home) Jö
> Agreed, which is why the docs actually suggest
> /{etc,var}/opt/packagename,
> for example, /etc/opt/RICHTapache2 and
> /var/opt/RICHTapache2. Although
> the pathname is a bit longer, there can be no
> confusion as to what package
> it's associated with!
That works too, although over time, you'
> I never liked the /etc/opt/apache2, and so on that
> some distributions
> did as sometimes it wasn't clear which apache2 read
> what configuration
> from where, it also made greps by lazy admins (like
> me) painful ;)
/etc/opt//apache2/ is the clean and correct way to
deliver 3rd party configur
> These ARC cases are for integration to Solaris, so
> /opt is inappropriate,
> and /usr is correct.
I missed that, ouch. In that case, apologies for the /opt questions. I was
under the *wrong* impression that CoolStack (NG) was delivered separately of
Solaris. Live and learn...
This messa
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
As a related note glibc has some questionable protections, like
free(NULL)
which it simply ignores resulting in bugs remaining hidden. GNU ls
does a
free(NULL) somewhere which we discovered while demoing truss on linux
processes in BrandZ. It is also visible
> The user could easily change the apache2 symlink if
> it bothers them, and that
> would point to the new version, but would allow your
> entire stack to use the
> runpath you compiler for.
That won't work. It's ad-hoc, and ad-hoc doesn't work if you have several tens
of thousands (yes, you r
> Whatever proposal wins it should preserve _choice_
> for admins/developers.
> Let _them_ decide which version they are going to
> use.
> If we are going to compete with linux we should give
> choice because
> one of linux strength is giving choice (one may
> disagree with me but I
> have written
Moinak Ghosh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > [...]
> >> Strictly conformant to the above would therefore be:
> >>
> >> #definedirfd(dp) ((dp) ? (dp)->dd_fd : -1)
> >>
> >
> > No. Nothing to do with strictly conformant; while it is possible
> > to have a DI
> 2. The currently proposed Apache 2.2.4 integration
> installs Apache in
> /usr/apache2, thereby _overwriting_ the existing
> Apache 2.0.x. Valid arguments
> have been made pro, and against this approach, with
> the suggestion that Apache
> 2.2.4 installs in /usr/apache2.2, thereby preserving
>
On Thu, 22 Mar 2007, Richard L. Hamilton wrote:
And to try to answer my own question, Draft 2 says
(about dirfd() among others):
...shall be declared as functions and may also be defined as macros. Function
prototypes shall be provided.
and specifically about dirfd():
The dirfd( ) function ma
> Overwriting the /usr/apache2 that comes on the
> Solaris media is a no-no,
> in my opinion, and /usr/apache2.2 just pollutes the
> /usr namespace even
> more than it is already. IMHO, the correct place for
> this is under /opt.
Agreed.
> I have no strong feelings either way, but I would
> pref
> Hi.
>
> The ARC Cases for the WebStack NG Project have been
> submitted for review (and
> hopefully approval), and i would like to ask our
> community's input regarding two
> important questions which have come up during our
> discussions:
>
> 1. Should the initial components released for thi
Joerg Schilling wrote:
>Ian Collins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>
>>>Solaris libc, unfortunately, also allows free(foo); free(foo);
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>Legal undefined behaviour :)
>>
>>
>
>Calling free(foo); free(foo); is not legal and may result in anything,
>including
>pink s
On 22/03/07, Darren J Moffat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Dick Davies wrote:
> On 22/03/07, Thomas De Schampheleire <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> pkginfo SUNWman does show:
>> system SUNWman On-Line Manual Pages
>>
>> doesn't this mean it is installed?
>
> That's the man command, not the man
Ian Collins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >Solaris libc, unfortunately, also allows free(foo); free(foo);
> >
> >
> >
> Legal undefined behaviour :)
Calling free(foo); free(foo); is not legal and may result in anything, including
pink smoke on top of your screen.
free(foo); free(foo); however i
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
>
> > As a related note glibc has some questionable protections, like
> >free(NULL)
> > which it simply ignores resulting in bugs remaining hidden. GNU ls
> >does a
> > free(NULL) somewhere which we discovered while demoing truss on linux
> > processes in Brand
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
>
>> As a related note glibc has some questionable protections, like
>>free(NULL)
>> which it simply ignores resulting in bugs remaining hidden. GNU ls
>>does a
>> free(NULL) somewhere which we discovered while demoing truss on linux
>> processes in BrandZ. It is
> As a related note glibc has some questionable protections, like
>free(NULL)
> which it simply ignores resulting in bugs remaining hidden. GNU ls
>does a
> free(NULL) somewhere which we discovered while demoing truss on linux
> processes in BrandZ. It is also visible when you use ltrac
Thanks Rod !
Does the GNU Toolchain also generates this dynamic entry (or a similar kind) in
its executable's elf files?
If not, Would the rtld still work fine without this Libc interface information ?
Regards,
Rajesh
This message posted from opensolaris.org
On 3/22/07, James Carlson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I don't think, though, that "decent package management" is entirely or
even primarily a feature of the packaging software itself. A huge
amount of the effort rests on the project teams who package and
deliver the software -- if they don't thin
67 matches
Mail list logo
