I know Slashdot is not the most reliable source of news. I just thought that
was a bit interesting, either as a humor or
But yea, I'd have to agree the Onion is a more reliable source. :-)
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolar
> I found this reading through the Slashdot thread
> about GPLing Java and the potentially of GPLing
> OpenSolaris.
>
> Something inference about Sun taking a bribe from MS
> to make OpenSolaris less 'free' or 'open'?
>
> Anybody know anything about this or it the usual
> FUD?
>
>
I found this reading through the Slashdot thread about GPLing Java and the
potentially of GPLing OpenSolaris.
Something inference about Sun taking a bribe from MS to make OpenSolaris less
'free' or 'open'?
Anybody know anything about this or it the usual FUD?
[b]Breitling UHR uhren replika Breitling replica watches breitling montre[/b]
Shipping is included in all prices on site. GERMANY FRANCE UK EUROPE IRELAND,
etc. We ship worldwide EMS express.
http://advertising-email-services.com/breitling_replica_watch.html
http://advertising-email-services.
Derek Cicero wrote:
As the failover to the backup machine is not working correctly.
Hopefully we'll have it back up in less than 10 minutes.
OK, it was longer than 10 minutes, but the site is back up.
Sorry for the inconvenience.
Derek
Derek
--
Derek Cicero
Program Manager
Solaris Kern
As the failover to the backup machine is not working correctly.
Hopefully we'll have it back up in less than 10 minutes.
Derek
--
Derek Cicero
Program Manager
Solaris Kernel Group, Software Division
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-disc
Seconded.
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
hi all,
together with my colleague Vladimir Kotal we wrote a presentation
called "Simple Solaris Installation" for CZOSUG bootcamp summarizing all the
necessary installation steps and some important stuff users might probably
need after that (network configuration, system servi
Joerg Schilling wrote:
If Sun does this, it is a good step, but it would
stigmatise the CDDL as a license that is not really loved even
inside Sun.
No, it simply recognizes that every project has it's own set of
goals and constraints which affect the license choice, and those
are very differen
Glynn Foster <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> No rumour at all. The entire stack is being licensed under the GPLv2, with
> some
> classpath exceptions. The major reason is getting to an OSI community approved
> license that everyone has already agreed to [see gcj/classpath]. It's the
> license with t
Erast Benson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I have the same feeling. Good move.
>
> And if we will see that Java/GPL community grows way faster then
> OpenSolaris/CDDL, than obvious questions will arise ... i.e. why not
> dual license OpenSolaris with GPL too?
If you like feedback, you cannot dual
On Mon, 2006-11-13 at 19:48 +0800, Tao Chen wrote:
> On 11/13/06, Bob Palowoda <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > If Sun does this, it is a good step, but it would
> > > stigmatise the CDDL as a license that is not really
> > > loved even
> > > inside Sun.
> > >
> > > Anybody knows more?
> >
> > It'
Ian Collins writes:
> James, I think you either missed my point, or more likely I wasn't clear.
>
> I was suggesting that it might be interesting to come up with a means of
> building the barest minimum of OpenSolaris that could boot and be used
> to build the rest. A bit like the bootstrap buil
Haim Zilberbord writes:
> for example: Joerg arguing about makefile incompatibility(sun -> gnu), and
> about sun make and sun ld coupling. it is interesting, and can stop in this
> my "project". because developing and supporting complete separate build
> system is hell, considering the fact that
On 11/13/06, Bob Palowoda <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> If Sun does this, it is a good step, but it would
> stigmatise the CDDL as a license that is not really
> loved even
> inside Sun.
>
> Anybody knows more?
It's not an OpenSolaris issue. Java is not part of OpenSolaris.
Sun may consider
> If Sun does this, it is a good step, but it would
> stigmatise the CDDL as a license that is not really
> loved even
> inside Sun.
>
> Anybody knows more?
It's not an OpenSolaris issue. Java is not part of OpenSolaris.
---Bob
This message posted from opensolaris.org
Erast Benson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sun, 2006-11-12 at 08:12 -0800, Haim Zilberbord wrote:
> > >If you want GNU-like environment but with OpenSolaris core ...
> >
> > Can i build Nexenta from Nexenta without closed sun tools ?
>
> Yes, if you experienced hacker...
Unless a lot of things
On 13/11/06, Joerg Schilling <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
If Sun does this, it is a good step, but it would
stigmatise the CDDL as a license that is not really loved even
inside Sun.
Anybody knows more?
This was quite a good read (from a 'why not BSD' perspective):
http://www.infoq.com/news/200
Joerg Schilling wrote:
> If Sun does this, it is a good step, but it would
> stigmatise the CDDL as a license that is not really loved even
> inside Sun.
>
> Anybody knows more?
No rumour at all. The entire stack is being licensed under the GPLv2, with some
classpath exceptions. The major reas
If Sun does this, it is a good step, but it would
stigmatise the CDDL as a license that is not really loved even
inside Sun.
Anybody knows more?
Jörg
--
EMail:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (home) Jörg Schilling D-13353 Berlin
[EMAIL PROTECTED](uni)
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
20 matches
Mail list logo
