[ i'm resending this email which i originally sent on Oct 16 but got
silently dropped due to local host mail configuration problems. ]
On Sat, Oct 14, 2006 at 06:23:40PM -0700, Trevor Maggs wrote:
> Anyone who knows the solution please tell me why I am having this problem?
>
> Motherboard: ASUS
A powerful tool to operate the pci/pice registers and to reassign interrupt.
I have not awared that it's not open for its danger.
Burke, Christopher B. [C] wrote:
What is pcitool?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Freeman
Liu
Sent: Wedn
Hello!
Is there a rule of thumb for allocating swap space on a larger machine? For
example, a V1280, 12 CPU's and 48Gb of memory.
Thanks.
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.
Young Joo Pintaske wrote On 10/27/06 05:56,:
Hi!
I noticed a huge number of "Views" while watching I18n community email archives
the other day. Look at the Views column in the following link:
http://www.opensolaris.org/jive/index.jspa?categoryID=1
>
>
For example, while there are 22 emails in
I'd like to request creation of an SMF Documentation project (smf-doc).
The goal of this project is to provide a location and source code
repository for collaboration and comment on SMF documentation.
Expected documentation for early collaboration is an SMF developer guide
and SMF FAQ. Product-b
Eric Enright wrote:
On 10/26/06, Robert Lunnon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Can anyone give me an explanation of what exactly would cause a signal
for
Segmentation Violation - Page - Fault to be returned. The Memory region
accessed was previously accessed successfully then suddenly causes a page
On 10/26/06, Robert Lunnon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Can anyone give me an explanation of what exactly would cause a signal for
Segmentation Violation - Page - Fault to be returned. The Memory region
accessed was previously accessed successfully then suddenly causes a page
fault. Is there a way
Can anyone give me an explanation of what exactly would cause a signal for
Segmentation Violation - Page - Fault to be returned. The Memory region
accessed was previously accessed successfully then suddenly causes a page
fault. Is there a way to look at the page attributes of a memory region in
Derek Cicero wrote:
Due to a major blizzard and power outage in Colorado. I do not have an
ETA as to when it will be back up.
It is back up.
Sorry for any inconvenience.
Derek
Derek
--
Derek Cicero
Program Manager
Solaris Kernel Group, Software Division
__
> You could try searching the sun blogs:
>
>
> ttp://www.google.com/search?q=site%3Ablogs.sun.com+log
> ical+domains&btnG=Search
Thanks for the hint - I searched for "Hypervisor" but "Logical Domains" has
much more results
regards
Bernd
This message posted from opensolaris.org
__
You could try searching the sun blogs:
http://www.google.com/search?q=site%3Ablogs.sun.com+logical+domains&btnG=Search
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Hi!
I noticed a huge number of "Views" while watching I18n community email archives
the other day. Look at the Views column in the following link:
http://www.opensolaris.org/jive/index.jspa?categoryID=1
For example, while there are 22 emails in the Korean i18n community
(g11n-ko-discuss), ther
On Thu, 26 Oct 2006, Gino Ruopolo wrote:
> Why "load average" is not interesting?
> (if I remember well load value is # of runnable process waiting for cpu ...)
You remember wrongly. :-)
The load average is the number of runnable processes PLUS the
number of running processes.
> Unfortunately
>> My ---initial testing--- between a 4x880 Opteron and SF4800 12x USIII
>> 1200 Mhz are showing lower load on the SF4800 when more than 10.000 process
>> >>running.
>>
>> Anyway doing benchmark is not easy :)
>
>Load average isn't interesting. What is interesting is throughput...
Why "load avera
Thank you for the information perhaps I could suggest a link or stock item on
Sun's main site at this address? But a small charge from a UK or European
retailer like Amazon would be the best solution?
http://globalspecials.sun.com/servlet/ControllerServlet?Action=DisplayPage&Locale=en_US&id=Pro
I do a storage based data replication for disater recovery with SVM from a Sun
Cluster 3.1 with Truecopy (Hitachi) of a Oracle RAC database (raw devices) and
map the device to a DRsite (single host). I see the disk with format and try
to recreate the metaset an soft partition with:
metaset -s
Hi
http://www.vmware.com/support/kb/enduser/std_adp.php?p_faqid=2074
dont help me...dont no why, but eeprom settings will note save.
I have to edit /boot/grub/menu.lst with kernel/unix after multiboot.
Regards
This message posted from opensolaris.org
_
"Bernd" == Bernd Schemmer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>> So you're talking here about the LDOMs support in the hypervisor, not
>>> just the hypervisor.
Bernd> Yes, I just want to make myself familiar with the abilities and
Bernd> restrictions of the hypervisor support on the new SPARC T1 CPUs
Be
>>So you're talking here about the LDOMs support in the hypervisor, not
>>just the hypervisor.
Yes, I just want to make myself familiar with the abilities and restrictions of
the hypervisor support on the new SPARC T1 CPUs from an Solaris administration
point of view. I'm not much interested in
Gino Ruopolo wrote:
Also other sysadmin I know found the same when
switched from Sparc to Opteron...
Then you know the wrong sysadmins.
:|
Simple test: Compile some files in parallel (dmake -j
X) on a 2 cpu box:
(1) dmake -j 2
real 1:18.18
user 1:37.05
sys
"Bernd" == Bernd Schemmer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Bernd> There are rumours that Solaris 10 Update 3 will contain support
Bernd> for the hypervisor of the SPARC T1 CPUS in the T1000 / T2000.
Bernd> I've searched on opensolaris.org, sunsolve, docs.sun.com, and
Bernd> www.opensparc.net but I did
On Thu, 26 Oct 2006, Bernd Schemmer wrote:
There are rumours that Solaris 10 Update 3 will contain support for the
hypervisor of the SPARC T1 CPUS in the T1000 / T2000.
I don't know about Update 3. But the hypervisor is an integral part of
sun4v. Just T1000/T2000 firmware that ships at the mo
Nice tool. The web page that describes the tool has some badly resized images
on it, which doesn't look very professional. Also, the tool has a link to a web
address at the bottom of the window, when I run it on my system, that links to
a site that has free NIC drivers, but there is no explanati
There are rumours that Solaris 10 Update 3 will contain support for the
hypervisor of the SPARC T1 CPUS in the T1000 / T2000.
I've searched on opensolaris.org, sunsolve, docs.sun.com, and www.opensparc.net
but I did not find any relevant information on how to use the hypervisor.
Where can I fin
Hi,
> Does the Solaris OS support your x86 PCI devices?
> Your answer may be only a click away with the new
> http://www.sun.com/bigadmin/hcl/hcts/device_detect.html";>Sun Device
> Detection Tool.
Nice tool, but why does it not run on Solaris Nevada?
Willi
_
Due to a major blizzard and power outage in Colorado. I do not have an
ETA as to when it will be back up.
Derek
--
Derek Cicero
Program Manager
Solaris Kernel Group, Software Division
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolari
> > Also other sysadmin I know found the same when
> switched from Sparc to Opteron...
>
> Then you know the wrong sysadmins.
:|
> Simple test: Compile some files in parallel (dmake -j
> X) on a 2 cpu box:
>
> (1) dmake -j 2
> real 1:18.18
> user 1:37.05
> sys
Gino Ruopolo schrieb:
Galvin Maltby wrote:
That's never been my experience.
Not my experience neither.
Also other sysadmin I know found the same when switched from Sparc to Opteron...
Then you know the wrong sysadmins.
Simple test: Compile some files in parallel (dmake -j X) on a 2 cpu bo
David McDaniel wrote:
OK, I confess, this isnt opensolaris, its S10 0606. But a lot of smart people
hang out here so I'll post anyway.
A multithreaded process core dumps with this traceback:
fed40f90 _lwp_kill (ffbfeec8, fed700b8, 39eb4, 0, fed68284, fed70904) + 8
fed2e574 thr_panic (fed55e1
OK, I confess, this isnt opensolaris, its S10 0606. But a lot of smart people
hang out here so I'll post anyway.
A multithreaded process core dumps with this traceback:
fed40f90 _lwp_kill (ffbfeec8, fed700b8, 39eb4, 0, fed68284, fed70904) + 8
fed2e574 thr_panic (fed55e10, 65, 39de0, feca2390,
Hi,
im not sure where to serach. Within Sol10 6/06 or inside VMware.
I like to install Sol10 on 32bit-WinXP, VMware-Server 1.0.1. - Hardware: Intel
Core 2 Duo E6400, 2 Gig Ram
On my Laptop, a Centrino, it works perfect.
After bootup for install i can see that Sol10 boots up with the 32bit Ker
On 10/26/06, Alta Elstad <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Does the Solaris OS support your x86 PCI devices?
Your answer may be only a click away with the new
http://www.sun.com/bigadmin/hcl/hcts/device_detect.html";>Sun Device
Detection Tool.
I happened to read your blog and tried the tool just now o
GN writes:
> A while ago I tried to install Solaris 10 on a test machine but
> everytime I come to the network configuration, it just hangs when i
> choose DHCP for my NIC to obtain its IP from my ISP.
[...]
> I have 2 NICs on the test machine, a 3Com 3c905C-TX/TX-M (primary,
> connected to the mod
Does the Solaris OS support your x86 PCI devices?
Your answer may be only a click away with the new
http://www.sun.com/bigadmin/hcl/hcts/device_detect.html";>Sun Device
Detection Tool.
Nothing to install - just click and run.
Sun Device Detection Tool detects devices in your x86 system and then d
>> T2000 slow, really slow for that app :(
>for the t2000 to be shown the best light you need to run 24-32 copies of the
>single >threaded app to shine.
I think the performances of my app are deeply depending on cache size.
For example a 4800 with 8 USIII 900Mhz is much faster the
Please do NOT reply to this address. If you have any problems,
feel free to send email to the alias "[EMAIL PROTECTED]".
Firefox 2.0 contrib. builds on Solaris10, Solaris8/9 are now
available on mozilla.com
Download Page and Location
==
http://www.mozilla.com/en-US/firef
> > I'm doing some serious comparison to decide what to
> do with some old USIII 900 servers.
>
> What do you mean by the 900? 900MHz US-III - you
> quite 750MHz below.
We have on production several servers using USIII 900Mhz and 1200Mhz
and seriously thinking on replacing them with Opterons.
I
Casper
Concept of keeping SUNW*r and SUNW*u packages separately have its roots in the
beginning of 90's where the netbooting was usually done by loading (usually via
tftp) of RAM-disk image and the "big" files was placed on nfs-mounted "/usr
filesystem".
Currently people thinking differently...
Hi,
A while ago I tried to install Solaris 10 on a test machine but everytime I
come to the network configuration, it just hangs when i choose DHCP for my NIC
to obtain its IP from my ISP. Solaris without internet connection is useless to
me and as I'm very new to this OS I have no clue how to
On 10/26/06, Gavin Maltby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
HiOn 10/25/06 10:24, Gino Ruopolo wrote:> Hi All,>> - THIS IS NOT A FLAME!! --I'll take your word for it :-)>> I'm doing some serious comparison to decide what to do with some old USIII 900 servers.
What do you mean by the 900? 900MHz US
But what is the reason? Is the compiler different? Maybe the headers in
/usr/include? After all, I am building a new kernel image that will be
freestanding at run-time. What dependency is there on the host compilation
environment?
By the way, is there a difference between the Solaris Express do
What is pcitool?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Freeman
Liu
Sent: Wednesday, October 25, 2006 10:01 PM
To: Cyril Plisko
Cc: opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [osol-discuss] Proposal for easypci (fwd)
Hi
Hi
On 10/25/06 10:24, Gino Ruopolo wrote:
Hi All,
- THIS IS NOT A FLAME!! --
I'll take your word for it :-)
I'm doing some serious comparison to decide what to do with some old USIII 900
servers.
What do you mean by the 900? 900MHz US-III - you quite 750MHz below.
My applicat
> ZFS 11.0 on Solaris release 06/06, hangs systems when
> trying to copy files from my VXFS 4.1 file system.
> any ideas what this problem could be?.
What kind of system is that? How much memory is installed?
I'm able to hang an Ultra 60 with 256 MByte of main memory,
simply by writing big files
On 10/26/06, Freeman Liu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi, Cyril,
I have contact the original author of pcitool and found pcitool will
not be available for community. It will be impossible for easypci to
be integrated into opensolaris without it. I'll find another way, for
I believe this tool is u
45 matches
Mail list logo
