On Tue, Dec 06, 2005 at 10:53:22PM -0800, Charles Monett wrote:
> Fine, it might have been dead, and probably (almost) useless, but that
> would be enough for some to fill in the blank spaces if they were left
> on their own for those who'd even want to touch that code outside of
> Sun- if just f
Charles Monett wrote:
Fine, it might have been dead, and probably (almost) useless, but that would be
enough for some to fill in the blank spaces if they were left on their own for
those who'd even want to touch that code outside of Sun- if just for the
ability to add in support where the har
Fine, it might have been dead, and probably (almost) useless, but that would be
enough for some to fill in the blank spaces if they were left on their own for
those who'd even want to touch that code outside of Sun- if just for the
ability to add in support where the hardware was dropped. At the
After a kernel module was loaded successfully, how to communicate wite this
kernel module like change the status of the kernel module.
In Linux, I can use /proc file to do that. But, In solaris, /proc file is just
used for processors.
Now, how can I communicate write my kernel module? Can I use
That "unsupported hardware" ought to cover all the way down in EOL'd territory
to the Ultra 1, which seems to be the absolute low point of "supported
hardware" - which amounts to little more than a fast 32 bit CPU due to a
significant bug in certain 64bit operations.However, it seems that perfec
On Tue, Dec 06, 2005 at 07:11:03PM -0800, Charles Monett wrote:
> Noticing the mailing lists, and otherwise, it seems that you want to put
> the sun4m support away for good (along with a similar incident done to
> the ZX on versions 7 & 8) and not even allow for a last supported, open
> "foot-in-t
Charles Monett wrote:
Noticing the mailing lists, and otherwise, it seems that you want to put the sun4m support away for good (along with a similar incident done to the ZX on versions 7 & 8) and not even allow for a last supported, open "foot-in-the-door" release. Sure, used ultrasparc hardware
len wrote:
I believe that Solaris Express 11/05 has no support or broken support on Intel
915GM's video.
I believe it should support it, as it includes the Xorg driver
changes that claim to provide i915GM support, but have no i915GM
machines to prove or disprove it. Is there some problem you
I believe that Solaris Express 11/05 has no support or broken support on Intel
915GM's video.
Any suggestion is greatly appreciated.
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Noticing the mailing lists, and otherwise, it seems that you want to put the
sun4m support away for good (along with a similar incident done to the ZX on
versions 7 & 8) and not even allow for a last supported, open
"foot-in-the-door" release. Sure, used ultrasparc hardware might be cheap- but
The trick is to catch these people early :
http://hardware.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=05/12/06/2232237&tid=102&tid=137
My flame suit is on and I am standing in a cold shower :
http://hardware.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=170374&cid=14198802
Dennis
__
Or a simpler solution
or *nix
cat file1 file2 ...> filename
on windows
copy /b file1 + file2... filename
where file1 etc.. = segments and filename is equal to final dvd image name.
example
cat sol1a sol1b sol1c sol1d sol1e > sol10.iso
copy /b sol1a + sol1b + sol1c + sol1d + sol1e sol10.iso
Hi All,
On my sparetime, I want to try porting/compile
opensolaris into following IBM platforms.
1. s390/zseries platform
http://www-03.ibm.com/servers/eserver/zseries/
Mainframe emulator http://www.conmicro.cx/hercules
and 2. cellprocessor platform
http://www-03.ibm.com/chips/power/splash/cell/
c
I've just realised - is (hd1,x) not on the second hard disk? I'm assuming you
know that. If not, then you need to use (hd0,x) instead in your menu.lst file
to refer to the first hard disk in your system.
Cheers
Andrew.
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
> It seems to me that boot sector of windows was
> damaged after updating Solaris
In which case (assuming you are using Windows 2000 or XP):
1. Boot from the Windows install CD.
2. Choose "R" for recovery console once the CD has booted.
3. The CD should find your Windows installation and present
UltraSPARC T1
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Approved: Gw3Zx
Has anyone at Sun had a chance to do a build on one of the new UltraSPARC
T1 's? If so how long does it take? How high can you set maxjobs?
Bill Rushmore
www.rushmores.net
This
Hi,
Below are some links to resources that might help you.
Sun Cluster Geographic Edition Overview document:
http://docs.sun.com/app/docs/doc/817-7499?q=Sun+Cluster+3.1+8%2F05
Sun Cluster Data Service for Grid Engine (Solaris OS) install document:
http://docs.sun.com/app/docs/doc/819-1089?q=Sun
Dave Miner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > - The configuration is so cryptic that I failed a fifth
> > time to understand it and it was another time that I
> > compiled and configured ISC dhcpd instead and configured
> >
As Sun recently released its entire application stack, it is now viable to run
the enterprise availability tools right in one's rack at home.
There are two products in the aforementioned application stack - namely the
clustering SW and the N1 Grid Engine.
My goal is to build a high-availability
19 matches
Mail list logo
