On 7/1/05, Jim Grisanzio <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Dennis Clarke wrote:
> > On 7/1/05, Jim Grisanzio <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >>I'd like to update the "related links" page on the site. It's way too
> >>thin right now.
> >
> >
> > Are you taking the week off Jim ? A little vacation is in
I just thought I would share a couple of announcements that I just added
to the site:
* First community contribution integrated
* Cryto and crypto-related source code available for download
As you can imagine, we're excited about both of these announcements, and
thought you would be as we
Mike Kupfer wrote:
(moved from opensolaris-bugs to opensolaris-discuss)
"Gary" == Gary Gendel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Gary> I can't seem to find where to vote on a bug in the database. A
Gary> pointer would be nice.
The bug interface is missing some features that we weren't able to
im
Dennis Clarke wrote:
On 7/1/05, Jim Grisanzio <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I'd like to update the "related links" page on the site. It's way too
thin right now.
Are you taking the week off Jim ? A little vacation is in order I think. :-)
Vacation ... yes. My baby has learned how to smil
On Fri, 1 Jul 2005, Keith M Wesolowski wrote:
> questions, but the wheels of lawyers spin slowly.
Of course--they probably charge by the hour...
--
Rich Teer, SCNA, SCSA, OpenSolaris CAB member
President,
Rite Online Inc.
Voice: +1 (250) 979-1638
URL: http://www.rite-group.com/rich
__
(moved from opensolaris-bugs to opensolaris-discuss)
> "Gary" == Gary Gendel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Gary> I can't seem to find where to vote on a bug in the database. A
Gary> pointer would be nice.
The bug interface is missing some features that we weren't able to
implement before the
Phil Harman wrote:
Mike Kupfer wrote:
Logins to the site were broken earlier this morning. (I couldn't login,
either.)
Things seem to be working better now.
mike
Nope, it's still broken from here. I even got a screenful of Java
stack trace on one attempt. It now claims "The informatio
On 7/1/05, Jim Grisanzio <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'd like to update the "related links" page on the site. It's way too
> thin right now.
Are you taking the week off Jim ? A little vacation is in order I think. :-)
> How would you like to organize it? Do we need a policy
> about who we lin
I'd like to update the "related links" page on the site. It's way too
thin right now. How would you like to organize it? Do we need a policy
about who we link to? What "related" resources do we really need? This
is an updated list below that I'm working on. No decisions on what we
link to just
On Fri, Jul 01, 2005 at 11:30:54AM -0700, A K Saravanan wrote:
> Here it says that CDDL is incompatible with GPL, and it urges no to use CDDL.
They're certainly free to recommend whatever they want, just as Sun is
and just as you are.
> "a module covered by the GPL and a module covered by the CD
On Fri, 2005-07-01 at 11:30, A K Saravanan wrote:
> How are we using Grub, Gnome, etc?
Grub is not linked to Solaris. In fact if some other boot loader
that supports the multiboot architecture comes along we can very
likely use that.
The use of Grub to boot Solaris is equivalent to you running b
>http://www.gnu.org/licenses/license-list.html
>
>Site lists the CDDL in the page: Various Licenses and Comments about Them
>
>Here it says that CDDL is incompatible with GPL, and it urges no to use CDDL.
>
>"a module covered by the GPL and a module covered by the CDDL cannot legally
>be linked
> If a change is really small, it should be possible to
> verify the change by just looking at it (doing code review).
>
> Jörg
I disagree, even a small change may destabilize a subsystem enough due side
effects
not catched during code review to cause
panics, hangs or corruption. We've been hit
Mike Kupfer wrote:
Logins to the site were broken earlier this morning. (I couldn't login,
either.)
Things seem to be working better now.
It is working intermittently right now. Our network is acting very
strangely. Nothing has changed, but suddenly we are getting a lot of
errors in the log
Mike Kupfer wrote:
Logins to the site were broken earlier this morning. (I couldn't login,
either.)
Things seem to be working better now.
mike
Nope, it's still broken from here. I even got a screenful of Java stack
trace on one attempt. It now claims "The information you entered does
n
http://www.gnu.org/licenses/license-list.html
Site lists the CDDL in the page: Various Licenses and Comments about Them
Here it says that CDDL is incompatible with GPL, and it urges no to use CDDL.
"a module covered by the GPL and a module covered by the CDDL cannot legally be
linked together.
On 7/1/05, Chris Ricker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> As an admin of both Linux and various Unixen, one thing I really like from
> most distros on the Linux side is the consolidation of patch and package
> management into just package management. It tends to simplify systems
> management a good deal
Logins to the site were broken earlier this morning. (I couldn't login,
either.)
Things seem to be working better now.
mike
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
On 01/07/05, Ben Rockwood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The Genunix seeds were down for some unknown reason (bt now closes the
> controlling terminal, even if its a screen session when exiting which
> sucks ass). I've brought back up the seeds on genunix and I'm testing.
You should look at the "zo
I reverted back some changes we recently made to the Tracker and now things
are running again.
Apparently some endian issues are preventing us from enabling some
features in
the tracker. Building the tracker for the correct endian for the boxes
allows the extended features to work, but breaks t
On Thu, 30 Jun 2005, Albert White wrote:
> The main things wrong with the SVR4 that I'm seeiing in this discussion is a
> lack of features in the tools, rahter than a problem with the SVR4 package and
> patch architecture.
>
> This would lead me to the conclusion that the best thing to do would b
Alan Coopersmith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Joerg Schilling wrote:
> > I put a compiled and hacked version on ftp://ftp.berlios.de/pub/schillix/
> > and I will enhance it (correct porting to S 11 and adding amd64 support).
>
> The current Xorg CVS head has some AMD64 support for Solaris that I c
Joerg Schilling wrote:
I put a compiled and hacked version on ftp://ftp.berlios.de/pub/schillix/
and I will enhance it (correct porting to S 11 and adding amd64 support).
The current Xorg CVS head has some AMD64 support for Solaris that I committed
a couple of months ago based on some experimen
> oriented around providing
> both binaries and
> reproducible (but customizable when needed) builds of
> those binaries would
> be a Good Thing
did I hear 'customizable'? say hello to portage!! that's one cool feature of
portage. You install what you customize. USE flags in portage provide you
JD Bronson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I have heard rumor that there are KNOWN issues with the Adaptec driver under
> solaris 10, and I was wondering if anyone can confirm that...
>
> I am seeing something odd. I have replaced all the scsi
> cards/cables/terminators and even the drives with KNO
Dragan Cvetkovic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, 30 Jun 2005, [UTF-8] Jürgen Keil wrote:
>
> >>> Quite a few people have reported full duplex problems with the elxl
> >>> driver; maybe there's a bug somewhere in the elxl driver with full/half
> >>> duplex negotiation?
> >>
> >> I have tried f
Jake Maciejewski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I guess we need to wait for the driver source, as Jörg said. A possible
> alternative, however, might be the free "aperture" driver at
> http://www.bolthole.com/solaris/drivers/. If that works, we can have free X
> without waiting for the next tar
On Fri, Jul 01, 2005 at 05:39:22PM +0200, Joerg Schilling wrote:
> Eric Schrock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> If a change is really small, it should be possible to verify the change
> by just looking at it (doing code review).
Code review is not a substitute for testing. If the expectation is
tha
Albert White <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The main things wrong with the SVR4 that I'm seeiing in this discussion is
> a lack of features in the tools, rahter than a problem with the SVR4
> package and patch architecture.
>
> This would lead me to the conclusion that the best thing to do would b
TJ Yang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I am interest to learn the process/procedue to build SchiliX LiveCD.
> I will make the process into a repeatable script for my personal use.
> you can use it too if you have TWW's sbutil installed.
>
> It will be similar to the opensoalris-1.0.sb file I post
On Fri, 1 Jul 2005, Joerg Schilling wrote:
> Blastwave unfortunatly currently is a binary "only" distribution.
> I would be happy if we could have the knowledge from Blastwave
> archived inside a source package system. I would be happy if this could be
> done with sps as sps is easy to adopt.
Th
Eric Boutilier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> - You have expressed a desire that the package infrastructure
> (registry, dependency tracking) for SchilliX be the Solaris standard
> (svr4), provided we can open-source it soon enough, correct?
Yes.
> - And how would you feel if others were to ma
On Fri, 1 Jul 2005, [UTF-8] Jürgen Keil wrote:
(btw, volcheck didn't react to floppies on my machine here)
What happens when you stop vold, and try to read from the PS/2 floppy
using dd?
# /etc/init.d/volmgt stop
# dd if=/dev/rdiskette of=/dev/null bs=18k
Does that report I/O errors?
Eric Boutilier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, 29 Jun 2005, Keith M Wesolowski wrote:
> >
> > ...
> > ...
> > Making the svr4 packaging tools available in source form is a high
> > priority; assuming it's possible - a likely proposition
>
> Note that open-sourcing Solaris packaging is current
It's from a libc_wrapper.c that shows up in the Xorg source, originally in
xc/programs/Xserver/hw/xfree86/os-support/shared/libc_wrapper.c, then gets
copied to xc/programs/Xserver/hw/xfree86/xf86cfg/ and possibly other locations.
I compiled with SunPro on SchilliX. I'm leaning toward this being
Keith M Wesolowski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Are you talking about how binaries built from ON and other Solaris
> consolidations are delivered, or about a hypothetical community-led
> third-party application repository like portage, pkgsrc, and blastwave
> provide today? Certainly unification
Eric Schrock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The testing will be based on the scope and content of the bug. For a
> simple fix to a utility, it may be sufficient to simply roll your own
> handmade regression tests. For more complicated changes, such as those
> to libraries, kernel, or system interf
When I hit the "Sign In" button, it does away for a bit, and then
FireFox reports "Done", but nothing happened (no chance of the screen,
no error message, and it still says "You are not signed in" in the top
right corner. I've even tried changing my password, but neither work.
I'm on the phone
Tim Hedwig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Joerg wrote:
>
> > Do you like to build something like a DSL router box
> > using OpenSolaris?
>
> Hm - but I am interested in changing my DLS woody-router to a
> schillix/OpenSolaris or a FreeBSD one. Is it possible, at the current
> devlopment stage, to
Jake Maciejewski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> For whatever reason, libc_wrapper.o wanted __sin and __cos, even though the
> source only contained references to sin and cos. When compiled with GCC,
> however, libc_wrapper.o used sin and cos, so I managed to work around this
> problem, but I stil
Joerg Schilling wrote:
Eric Boutilier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Here's an idea for a quick-n-dirty approach: In theory (I think) one
could take all the files contained in all the Xorg packages from the
latest Nevada (Solaris Express) build and slap them onto a SchilliX
box. The nice thing is,
For whatever reason, libc_wrapper.o wanted __sin and __cos, even though the
source only contained references to sin and cos. When compiled with GCC,
however, libc_wrapper.o used sin and cos, so I managed to work around this
problem, but I still don't know why it was happening.
This message poste
>my opensolaris is running slow e.g. if I am compiling something, the mouse
>becomes jumpy and going
one workspace to another takes seconds. when idle the kernel consumes like 4-6
% cpu as shown by t
op. I have never seen solaris idle cpu usage beyond 1%.
>
>is it the debug mode? is it possible
my opensolaris is running slow e.g. if I am compiling something, the mouse
becomes jumpy and going one workspace to another takes seconds. when idle the
kernel consumes like 4-6 % cpu as shown by top. I have never seen solaris idle
cpu usage beyond 1%.
is it the debug mode? is it possible to tu
"Peter C. Tribble" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Not so. Solaris Express, and the Community release, are binary distributions
> based on OpenSolaris. Solaris 10 fails to qualify only as an accident in
> timing.
> And Sun provide prebuilt binary archives you can bfu.
The next Solaris Express may b
Scott Howard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 29, 2005 at 05:33:46PM +0800, James Lick wrote:
> > The only Sun
> > provided distribution of OpenSolaris comes only as source code (and a
> > bunch of binaries that are still closed source). You need to Solaris
>
> Not so. There is a bina
Eric Boutilier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Here's an idea for a quick-n-dirty approach: In theory (I think) one
> could take all the files contained in all the Xorg packages from the
> latest Nevada (Solaris Express) build and slap them onto a SchilliX
> box. The nice thing is, as with the rest o
Jake Maciejewski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> It sounds like you're good at getting things working.
>
> Do you know how to fix:
>
> Undefined first referenced
> symbol in file
> __cos libc_wrapper.o
> __sin
Execuse me for posting my question here not related to this subject.
Hi Joerg
Would you mind answer my question regarding the Schilix 0.1 Livecd creating
process ?
http://www.opensolaris.org/jive/thread.jspa?threadID=979&tstart=0
Thanks for your time
tj
This message posted from opensolaris.or
Scott Howard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 26, 2005 at 09:20:24PM -0700, Alan Coopersmith wrote:
> > Jake Maciejewski wrote:
> > >I've been trying to build X with NetBSD's pkgsrc.
> >
> > I've never tried using pkgsrc, but Xorg 6.8.2 should build out of
> > the box with little problem
Alan DuBoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > To my knowledge, there is no GUI as of yet. JDS has not yet been
> > > released as part of the OpenSolaris project.
> > >
> > > You may be able to install pkg-get from blastwave.org:
> > >
> > > http://www.blastwave.org/pkg_get.pkg
> >
> > pkg-get needs
>Al Hopper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> On Mon, 27 Jun 2005, Roy T. Fielding wrote:
>>
>> > On Jun 24, 2005, at 1:35 PM, Darren J Moffat wrote:
>> >
>> > > I'd like to create an OpenSolaris Security community. I'm volunteering
>> > > to be the community leader.
>> >
>> > Although we don't have
G'Day Raymond,
On Thu, 30 Jun 2005, Raymond Scott wrote:
> I'll be trying this out
> We just went through a painful process of changing from another vendors
> LDAP directory product to Sun's directory. Part of the conversion meant
> watching who was still using the old directories and telling
Al Hopper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, 27 Jun 2005, Roy T. Fielding wrote:
>
> > On Jun 24, 2005, at 1:35 PM, Darren J Moffat wrote:
> >
> > > I'd like to create an OpenSolaris Security community. I'm volunteering
> > > to be the community leader.
> >
> > Although we don't have a process
Eric Boutilier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sat, 25 Jun 2005, Xirui wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I have tried Schllix 0.1 on my Fujitsu-Siemens Amilo laptop. It booted,
> > connected to the network, and even mounted my USB external hard disk after
> > plugging. But the system only gave me a comm
> (btw, volcheck didn't react to floppies on my machine here)
What happens when you stop vold, and try to read from the PS/2 floppy using dd?
# /etc/init.d/volmgt stop
# dd if=/dev/rdiskette of=/dev/null bs=18k
Does that report I/O errors?
For Solaris 8 x86 .. Solaris 10 x86, most users
> Is there a separate source tree for
> the Install we've released that contains mods for
> OpenSolaris? 'cause
> if it's the one we all have in our internal
> workspaces, I can't see how
> it can work.
Yes, the OpenSolaris version has some code in it to copy the bins. I
[i]think[/i] this versio
Dan Mick wrote:
The torrents at http://dlc.sun.com/torrents/ seem to be dead. (no
seed?...
I'm not great with debugging BT)
___
Good call Dan. Thanks for reporting that.
The Genunix seeds were down for some unknown reason (bt now closes the
con
58 matches
Mail list logo
