On Apr 21, 2009, at 11:15 PM, Øyvind Harboe wrote:
Locking the repository has never been seriously discussed.
We have discussed adding release branches though. Release
branches never happened because there was no particular reason
to. If the last couple of days are representative for how thing
Locking the repository has never been seriously discussed.
We have discussed adding release branches though. Release
branches never happened because there was no particular reason
to. If the last couple of days are representative for how things
are going to be, then perhaps we should reconsider ad
On Tue, 2009-04-21 at 19:23 -0700, Jeff Williams wrote:
> It was handled badly. When Duane threw in the towel there should have
> been some discussion before you guys went ape with churn. Duane -
> thank you for your help. And to the other MC1322x guys - I'm sorry
> that I'm letting you do
It was handled badly. When Duane threw in the towel there should have
been some discussion before you guys went ape with churn. Duane -
thank you for your help. And to the other MC1322x guys - I'm sorry
that I'm letting you down, but it's not a workable situation for us at
the moment. T
Hi all,
Here are some of my thoughts about some of the issues raised today.
Normally, I try to refrain from allowing myself to write this... openly,
but recent events compel me to try and address the problems head on.
I tried to make the main points summarize my position, but nothing
herein was
