On Apr 21, 2009, at 11:15 PM, Øyvind Harboe wrote:
Locking the repository has never been seriously discussed. We have discussed adding release branches though. Release branches never happened because there was no particular reason to. If the last couple of days are representative for how things are going to be, then perhaps we should reconsider adding release branches. SVN HEAD is reserved for churn. Those that need longer cycles can create against releases. This is possible today, but a bit simpler and more formalized if we add branches.-- Øyvind HarboeEmbedded software and hardware consulting services http://consulting.zylin.com _______________________________________________ Openocd-development mailing list Openocd-development@lists.berlios.de https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/openocd-development
Actually, we do have release branches. There is a openocd-0.1 branch for any 0.1.x releases. There just has been so much new put in since 0.1.0 that it would be misleading to call the next release 0.1.1. If we want to start converging towards a 0.2.0, then I'll spin off a branch. I was just under the assumption that there were a few major goals that still have significant change associated with them in play for 0.2.0.
-- Rick Altherr kc8...@kc8apf.net"He said he hadn't had a byte in three days. I had a short, so I split it with him."
-- Unsigned
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
_______________________________________________ Openocd-development mailing list Openocd-development@lists.berlios.de https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/openocd-development
