On Wednesday 03 June 2009, Duane Ellis wrote:
> (d) There should be *NO* concept of "active tap", nor "active target"
I think you mean "current" not "active". Agreed, nothing of
that level of significance should be implicit in a wire protocol.
At the user interface level, it may be a very diffe
PART DUEX
==
To understand this - please - read my earlier thread: "Target AJAX like
support - User Interface Thread".
This thread discusses the "command ideas".
The user interface part is in the earlier thread.
What ever we do - we need to come up with a Nifty Protocol name for this
PART DUEX
==
To understand this - please - read my earlier thread: "Target AJAX like
support - User Interface Thread".
This thread discusses the "command ideas".
The user interface part is in the earlier thread.
What ever we do - we need to come up with a Nifty Protocol name for this
