Hi,
The patch does not have any side effects and problem seems to be solved
so I have committed the patch with minor cosmetic changes.
Thanks.
Regards,
Magnus
Zach Welch wrote:
> Given your information and the code, the attached patch should work
> around the problem, unless there are instruc
Fantastic! Your patch allows me to single step. You have fixed my
one and only problem with OpenOCD. Keep up the great work.
Sincere thanks,
Ken
On Mon, Apr 13, 2009 at 5:31 PM, Zach Welch wrote:
> Given your information and the code, the attached patch should work
> around the problem,
Given your information and the code, the attached patch should work
around the problem, unless there are instructions not handled by the
following block of logic. I added output to see if that is the case.
Cheers,
Zach
On Tue, 2009-04-14 at 00:50 +0200, Magnus Lundin wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Is it pos
Hi,
Is it possible to find out the exact assembly code that kills OpenOCD ?
Let me guess that I could be an immediate shift or MOVS in thumb mode .
I am not an expert on the single step PC prediction code in
arm_simulate_step(target_t *target, u32 *dry_run_pc) but
there are some tumb instructio
On Mon, Apr 13, 2009 at 2:23 PM, Hermann Kraus wrote:
> On Mon, 13 Apr 2009 23:11:29 +0200, Ken Smith wrote:
>>
>> This crash kills openocd every time. Any ideas?
>
> I have the same problem and one more person on this list also reported it.
> It crashes at exactly the same location. I hope some
On Mon, 13 Apr 2009 23:11:29 +0200, Ken Smith wrote:
> This crash kills openocd every time. Any ideas?
I have the same problem and one more person on this list also reported it.
It crashes at exactly the same location. I hope someone fixes this soon,
as I currently don't have the time to deb
I tried to post this to the forum at sparkfun but was denied with:
Internal Server Error
The server encountered an internal error or misconfiguration and
was unable to complete your request. Your administrator may not have
enabled CGI access for this directory.
Thinking about it more, perhaps
