Re: [Openocd-development] SWD vs. SWIM

2010-02-23 Thread Antonio Borneo
Just received this advertisement, interesting for who is in Germany and plan to be at "embedded world 2010 in Nuremberg". You could get one of the 5000 free STM8S kit. I think each kit includes one ST-Link. http://www.st.com/stonline/products/families/embedded_2010.htm Best Regards, Antonio __

Re: [Openocd-development] SWD vs. SWIM

2010-02-22 Thread Michel Catudal
simon qian a écrit : > Hi, > As I know, ST-Link supports JTAG for STM32 and SWIM for STM8, but it > doesn't support SWD. > If you want to reflash STM32 of ST-Link to be supported by OpenOCD, > you can try Versaloon driver, but you will lost ST-Link's functionality. > The version on the STM8Discov

Re: [Openocd-development] SWD vs. SWIM

2010-02-21 Thread Xiaofan Chen
On Mon, Feb 22, 2010 at 4:52 AM, Spencer Oliver wrote: > On 21/02/2010 08:49, simon qian wrote: >> Hi, >> As I know, ST-Link supports JTAG for STM32 and SWIM for STM8, but it >> doesn't support SWD. >> If you want to reflash STM32 of ST-Link to be supported by OpenOCD, you >> can try Versaloon dri

Re: [Openocd-development] SWD vs. SWIM

2010-02-21 Thread Spencer Oliver
On 21/02/2010 08:49, simon qian wrote: > Hi, > As I know, ST-Link supports JTAG for STM32 and SWIM for STM8, but it > doesn't support SWD. > If you want to reflash STM32 of ST-Link to be supported by OpenOCD, you > can try Versaloon driver, but you will lost ST-Link's functionality. > The ST-LINK

Re: [Openocd-development] SWD vs. SWIM

2010-02-21 Thread simon qian
SWD is working in my branch of OpenOCD, but ONLY on Versaloon dongle. Official OpenOCD will maybe add SWD support in 0.5 release. FT2232H is USB-HS device, I don't think there is any chance for USB-FS STM32 Device to be faster. But it's almost impossible for FT2232H to support SWIM. If you want ST

Re: [Openocd-development] SWD vs. SWIM

2010-02-21 Thread CeDeROM
On Sun, Feb 21, 2010 at 8:49 AM, simon qian wrote: > Hi, > As I know, ST-Link supports JTAG for STM32 and SWIM for STM8, but it doesn't > support SWD. > If you want to reflash STM32 of ST-Link to be supported by OpenOCD, you can > try Versaloon driver, but you will lost ST-Link's functionality. O

Re: [Openocd-development] SWD vs. SWIM

2010-02-21 Thread simon qian
Hi, As I know, ST-Link supports JTAG for STM32 and SWIM for STM8, but it doesn't support SWD. If you want to reflash STM32 of ST-Link to be supported by OpenOCD, you can try Versaloon driver, but you will lost ST-Link's functionality. 2010/2/20 Michel Catudal > Le 20/02/2010 00:05, simon qian a

Re: [Openocd-development] SWD vs. SWIM

2010-02-20 Thread Michel Catudal
Le 20/02/2010 00:05, simon qian a écrit : > Hi, > I have implemented SWIM interface in Versaloon. > So I know SWIM is NOT SWD, SWIM is more complex. > > By modifying the software at the TM8Discovery Devel Kit I meant reflash the whole thing. The JTAG interface is present on the STM32 board so you

Re: [Openocd-development] SWD vs. SWIM

2010-02-19 Thread simon qian
Hi, I have implemented SWIM interface in Versaloon. So I know SWIM is NOT SWD, SWIM is more complex. 2010/2/20 Michel Catudal > Le 19/02/2010 16:55, CeDeROM a écrit : > > Ive just found an interesting STM8Discovery DevelKit with STM8S105C6T6 > > microcontroller (8-bit, 32 KB Flash, 2 KB RAM, 1 K

Re: [Openocd-development] SWD vs. SWIM

2010-02-19 Thread Michel Catudal
Le 19/02/2010 16:55, CeDeROM a écrit : > Ive just found an interesting STM8Discovery DevelKit with STM8S105C6T6 > microcontroller (8-bit, 32 KB Flash, 2 KB RAM, 1 KB EEPROM) onboard > for extremely low price (~$10) with supplied JTAG programmer (Embedded > ST-LINK). Anyone knows/use this St-Link ca

[Openocd-development] SWD vs. SWIM

2010-02-19 Thread CeDeROM
Ive just found an interesting STM8Discovery DevelKit with STM8S105C6T6 microcontroller (8-bit, 32 KB Flash, 2 KB RAM, 1 KB EEPROM) onboard for extremely low price (~$10) with supplied JTAG programmer (Embedded ST-LINK). Anyone knows/use this St-Link cable? Is this SWIM a SWD implementation? More de