On 04/15/2011 06:53 AM, Øyvind Harboe wrote:
Any objections?
No.
cu
Michael
___
Openocd-development mailing list
Openocd-development@lists.berlios.de
https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/openocd-development
Any objections?
--
Øyvind Harboe
Can Zylin Consulting help on your project?
US toll free 1-866-980-3434 / International +47 51 87 40 27
http://www.zylin.com/zy1000.html
ARM7 ARM9 ARM11 XScale Cortex
JTAG debugger and flash programmer
___
Openocd-de
Yes, that is what I think is right in this case.
I'm working with the S29AL008D, that is already on the table, but the
current code fails to detect the part. It has a high byte id.
As we only have a 8bit bus, we can't have by any mean the full 16 bit id.
Thanks.
On Tue, Apr 12, 2011 at 1:30 PM,
Am 04/12/2011 06:10 PM, schrieb Alexandre Pereira da Silva:
> Hi,
>
> I found a issue in the fixup detection of a x16 non cfi flash
> connected in a x8 bus.
>
> Attached the patch to fix the issue.
It seems in the x16_as_x8 case, you are only comparing 8 bits of the
device ID - this looks wrong to
Hi,
I found a issue in the fixup detection of a x16 non cfi flash
connected in a x8 bus.
Attached the patch to fix the issue.
Thanks.
From dd14670cf7416573d4fdf95fd1be5ab6c5747432 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Alexandre Pereira da Silva
Date: Tue, 12 Apr 2011 12:56:28 -0300
Subject: [PATCH 2/3
