Yes, that is what I think is right in this case. I'm working with the S29AL008D, that is already on the table, but the current code fails to detect the part. It has a high byte id.
As we only have a 8bit bus, we can't have by any mean the full 16 bit id. Thanks. On Tue, Apr 12, 2011 at 1:30 PM, Michael Schwingen <rincew...@discworld.dascon.de> wrote: > Am 04/12/2011 06:10 PM, schrieb Alexandre Pereira da Silva: >> Hi, >> >> I found a issue in the fixup detection of a x16 non cfi flash >> connected in a x8 bus. >> >> Attached the patch to fix the issue. > It seems in the x16_as_x8 case, you are only comparing 8 bits of the > device ID - this looks wrong to me. > > cu > Michael > > _______________________________________________ > Openocd-development mailing list > Openocd-development@lists.berlios.de > https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/openocd-development > _______________________________________________ Openocd-development mailing list Openocd-development@lists.berlios.de https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/openocd-development
