] Mac OS X: Broken build 1621 and
above (part 2)
It looks like flash_address() is missing a prototype in cfi.c which is
causing link problems, but only if you are building -O0. You do that
accidentally by overriding CFLAGS. The default CFLAGS is '-g -O2',
but by setting it to &#x
richt-
Von: Rick Altherr [mailto:kc8...@kc8apf.net]
Gesendet: Freitag, 8. Mai 2009 00:18
An: Zach Welch
Cc: Michael Fischer; Openocd-Dev
Betreff: Re: [Openocd-development] Mac OS X: Broken build 1621 and
above
(part 2)
On May 7, 2009, at 1:30 PM, Zach Welch wrote:
On Thu, 2009-05-07 at 21:27 +
Zach
Welch
Gesendet: Donnerstag, 7. Mai 2009 22:31
An: Michael Fischer
Cc: Openocd-Dev
Betreff: Re: [Openocd-development] Mac OS X: Broken build 1621 and above
(part 2)
On Thu, 2009-05-07 at 21:27 +0200, Michael Fischer wrote:
> Hello List,
>
> the problem with r1621 can be solved if AC_PROG_
On Thu, 2009-05-07 at 15:18 -0700, Rick Altherr wrote:
> On May 7, 2009, at 1:30 PM, Zach Welch wrote:
>
> > On Thu, 2009-05-07 at 21:27 +0200, Michael Fischer wrote:
> >> Hello List,
> >>
> >> the problem with r1621 can be solved if AC_PROG_CC_C99
> >> is removed from configure.in. In this cas we
On May 7, 2009, at 1:30 PM, Zach Welch wrote:
On Thu, 2009-05-07 at 21:27 +0200, Michael Fischer wrote:
Hello List,
the problem with r1621 can be solved if AC_PROG_CC_C99
is removed from configure.in. In this cas we have r1620.
But this is not solving the problem in the last version
r1649 if
On Thu, 2009-05-07 at 21:27 +0200, Michael Fischer wrote:
> Hello List,
>
> the problem with r1621 can be solved if AC_PROG_CC_C99
> is removed from configure.in. In this cas we have r1620.
>
> But this is not solving the problem in the last version
> r1649 if I remove AC_PROG_CC_C99 here too.
On May 7, 2009, at 12:27 PM, Michael Fischer wrote:
Hello List,
the problem with r1621 can be solved if AC_PROG_CC_C99
is removed from configure.in. In this cas we have r1620.
But this is not solving the problem in the last version
r1649 if I remove AC_PROG_CC_C99 here too.
Best regards,
Mi
Hello List,
the problem with r1621 can be solved if AC_PROG_CC_C99
is removed from configure.in. In this cas we have r1620.
But this is not solving the problem in the last version
r1649 if I remove AC_PROG_CC_C99 here too.
Best regards,
Michael
___
O
