On Thu, 2009-05-07 at 15:18 -0700, Rick Altherr wrote: > On May 7, 2009, at 1:30 PM, Zach Welch wrote: > > > On Thu, 2009-05-07 at 21:27 +0200, Michael Fischer wrote: > >> Hello List, > >> > >> the problem with r1621 can be solved if AC_PROG_CC_C99 > >> is removed from configure.in. In this cas we have r1620. > >> > >> But this is not solving the problem in the last version > >> r1649 if I remove AC_PROG_CC_C99 here too. > > > > Can you provide more details about the C99 breakage? You are the > > first > > person to report a problem, so I figure there is a workaround Darwin. [snip] > > I saw no C99 breakage with r1649 but I didn't build all the possible > interfaces. I did see that gcc was being invoked in gnu99 mode.
Thanks Rick. This is one of those times where I wish I could have stopped my message before it hit the list. :) Cheers, Zach _______________________________________________ Openocd-development mailing list Openocd-development@lists.berlios.de https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/openocd-development
