> So async telnet messages enable/disalbe option then?
>
> Off by default?
That's my vote. Having them on slows down debugging a lot.
> The C code is of course the ultimate in flexibility, which is why open
> source is such fun.
>
> I hate systems with lots of incomprehensible and undocumented
> I like to have as many configuration options as is necessary and no
> more.
I agree in principle, but that's a difficult thing to nail down because
what's necessary for one may not be necessary for another.
> I hate configuration options that are there just because the problem of
> how to solv
> 3. add an option(yuk!) of sorts. Perhaps remove asynchronous messages
> by default and make it possible to enable them? Who's going to find
> this option anyway?
I don't think adding a 'verbose' option to turn something like this on is
terrible by any means.
You get this information inside of GD
On Fri, Oct 31, 2008 at 1:43 PM, Chris Zimman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> So async telnet messages enable/disalbe option then?
>>
>> Off by default?
>
> That's my vote. Having them on slows down debugging a lot.
OK.
>> The C code is of course the ultimate in flexibility, which is why open
>> s
On Fri, Oct 31, 2008 at 1:38 PM, Chris Zimman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> 3. add an option(yuk!) of sorts. Perhaps remove asynchronous messages
>> by default and make it possible to enable them? Who's going to find
>> this option anyway?
>
> I don't think adding a 'verbose' option to turn somethi
