On Tue, Nov 3, 2009 at 8:55 PM, David Brownell wrote:
> On Tuesday 03 November 2009, zzzh.2007 wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> For FA526 core, following bugs exist:
>> 1. after making a step(in openocd-0.3.0-rc0) at reset vector
>> (at addr of 0, which is LDR pc 0x5c), the pc did not skip to
>> 0x5c, but to 0
On Tuesday 03 November 2009, zzzh.2007 wrote:
> Hi,
>
> For FA526 core, following bugs exist:
> 1. after making a step(in openocd-0.3.0-rc0) at reset vector
> (at addr of 0, which is LDR pc 0x5c), the pc did not skip to
> 0x5c, but to 0xfc(the instruction at addr of 4 is LDR pc 0x100)
Is that is
; Regards.
--
zzzh.2007
2009-11-04
-
Sender：David Brownell
Date：2009-11-04 11:43:34
Receiver：openocd-development; zzzh.2007
CC：
Topic：Re: [Openocd-development] 0.3.0-rc0: bugs for FA526 core
On Tuesday 03 November 2009, zzzh.2
; Regards.
--
zzzh.2007
2009-11-04
-
Sender：David Brownell
Date：2009-11-04 11:43:34
Receiver：openocd-development; zzzh.2007
CC：
Topic：Re: [Openocd-development] 0.3.0-rc0: bugs for FA526 core
On Tuesday 03 November 2009, zzzh.2
