On Tuesday 10 November 2009, Jonas Horberg wrote:
> I do not know why you belive that jtag_speed is a NOP for parport
> interfaces. Perhaps it is by code inspection and the following
> nasty thing confused you:
Right; looking more closely, I see how it did its thing.
So we'll be wanting that parp
David Brownell wrote on 2009-11-10 19:50:04:
> On Tuesday 10 November 2009, Jonas Horberg wrote:
> > David Brownell wrote on 2009-11-10 11:19:40:
> >
> > > On Tuesday 10 November 2009, Jonas Horberg wrote:
> > > > The removal of jtag_speed make it impossible to set the speed of
> > > > parport i
Benjamin Eckl wrote on 2009-11-10 17:39:14:
> As mentioned in my last mail for these translation errors, jtag_speed
> also gives me an error for parport interface.
> I did not check if the parameter was anyway handled correctly, but it
> seems to me, that this deprecated command does also not wo
On Tuesday 10 November 2009, Jonas Horberg wrote:
> David Brownell wrote on 2009-11-10 11:19:40:
>
> > On Tuesday 10 November 2009, Jonas Horberg wrote:
> > > The removal of jtag_speed make it impossible to set the speed of
> > > parport interfaces. They lack support for the jtag_khz and
> > > jt
On Tuesday 10 November 2009, Benjamin Eckl wrote:
> As mentioned in my last mail for these translation errors, jtag_speed
> also gives me an error for parport interface.
> I did not check if the parameter was anyway handled correctly, but it
> seems to me, that this deprecated command does also n
As mentioned in my last mail for these translation errors, jtag_speed
also gives me an error for parport interface.
I did not check if the parameter was anyway handled correctly, but it
seems to me, that this deprecated command does also not work quite
correctly.
@Jonas Horberg:
Do you get any
David Brownell wrote on 2009-11-10 11:19:40:
> On Tuesday 10 November 2009, Jonas Horberg wrote:
> > The removal of jtag_speed make it impossible to set the speed of
> > parport interfaces. They lack support for the jtag_khz and
> > jtag_rclk commands.
>
> They also lack support for jtag_speed .
On Tuesday 10 November 2009, Jonas Horberg wrote:
> The removal of jtag_speed make it impossible to set the speed of
> parport interfaces. They lack support for the jtag_khz and
> jtag_rclk commands.
They also lack support for jtag_speed ... but if you called
that, it wouldn't fail.
> I think th
David Brownell wrote on 2009-11-09 20:17:55:
> It's been about a year since these were deprecated and, in most
> cases, removed. There's no point in carrying that documentation,
> or backwards compatibility for "jtag_device" and "jtag_speed",
> around forever. (Or a few remnants of obsolete code
It's been about a year since these were deprecated and, in most
cases, removed. There's no point in carrying that documentation,
or backwards compatibility for "jtag_device" and "jtag_speed",
around forever. (Or a few remnants of obsolete code...)
Removed a few obsolete uses of "jtag_speed":
-
10 matches
Mail list logo
