The MC13224V is a FreeScale ARM7TDMI based IEEE® 802.15.4 platform for
Zigbee and similar low-power wireless applications. Using PIP
(Platform In Package) technology, it integrates: an RF balun and
matching network; a buck converter (only an external inductor is
necessary); 96KB of SRAM; and 128KB
On Sat, Feb 27, 2010 at 01:29:28PM -0800, David Brownell wrote:
> On Saturday 27 February 2010, Mariano Alvira wrote:
>
> There's a business in chip-specific LED-blinking systems?? ;)
Oh there sure is! I call it the devkit business.
>
> To the extent that wanting to do something quickly is a c
On Saturday 27 February 2010, Mariano Alvira wrote:
> > Well, "handy" doesn't seem sufficient to require everyone using this
> > chip to have that.
> >
> > This is however also sufficiently obvious (though I'd just "halt")
> > that most OpenOCD users should be able to whip that up easily.
>
> Nop
On Sat, Feb 27, 2010 at 3:38 PM, David Brownell wrote:
> On Saturday 27 February 2010, Mariano Alvira wrote:
>>
>> > I don't entirely "get" these chips which execute code from large SRAMs
>> > instead of from NOR flash ... I had understood that the SRAMs use more
>> > power than the NOR flash, so
On Sat, Feb 27, 2010 at 03:43:42PM -0500, Jon Smirl wrote:
>
> The mc13224 has 64KB flash and 96KB RAM.
It's actually 128KB. The last page is the calibration data so you can
only use 124KB. And only up to the first 96KB can get mirrored.
-Mar.
___
Ope
On Sat, Feb 27, 2010 at 1:51 PM, David Brownell wrote:
> On Saturday 27 February 2010, Mariano Alvira wrote:
>> On Sat, Feb 27, 2010 at 09:00:32AM -0800, David Brownell wrote:
>> > On Thursday 25 February 2010, Mariano Alvira wrote:
>> > > ---
>> >
>> > Needs a patch comment.
>>
>> Ok. Do the subj
On Saturday 27 February 2010, Mariano Alvira wrote:
>
> > I don't entirely "get" these chips which execute code from large SRAMs
> > instead of from NOR flash ... I had understood that the SRAMs use more
> > power than the NOR flash, so that most microcontrollers minimized the
> > quantity of SRAM
On Sat, Feb 27, 2010 at 10:51:13AM -0800, David Brownell wrote:
> On Saturday 27 February 2010, Mariano Alvira wrote:
> > On Sat, Feb 27, 2010 at 09:00:32AM -0800, David Brownell wrote:
> > > On Thursday 25 February 2010, Mariano Alvira wrote:
> > > > ---
> > >
> > > Needs a patch comment.
>
>
On Saturday 27 February 2010, Mariano Alvira wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 27, 2010 at 09:00:32AM -0800, David Brownell wrote:
> > On Thursday 25 February 2010, Mariano Alvira wrote:
> > > ---
> >
> > Needs a patch comment.
>
> Ok. Do the subject lines not get added as patch comments? I figured
> they w
On Sat, Feb 27, 2010 at 09:00:32AM -0800, David Brownell wrote:
> On Thursday 25 February 2010, Mariano Alvira wrote:
> > ---
>
> Needs a patch comment.
Ok. Do the subject lines not get added as patch comments? I figured
they would since they are generated from the commit messages.
>What's an
On Thursday 25 February 2010, Mariano Alvira wrote:
> ---
Needs a patch comment. What's an MC13224V? Maybe:
The MC13224V is a FreeScale ARM7TDMI based IEEE® 802.15.4 platform for
Zigbee and similar low-power wireless applications. It uses PIP
(Platform In Package) technology, and boots from R
---
tcl/target/mc13224v.cfg | 60 +++
1 files changed, 60 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
create mode 100644 tcl/target/mc13224v.cfg
diff --git a/tcl/target/mc13224v.cfg b/tcl/target/mc13224v.cfg
new file mode 100644
index 000..6766cf7
--- /dev/nul
12 matches
Mail list logo
