On Wed, Jan 13, 2010 at 9:48 PM, Peter Korsgaard wrote:
>> "Øyvind" == Øyvind Harboe writes:
>
> Øyvind> To me this patch looks reasonable. the .c file is basically a bunch
> Øyvind> of parameters and a few lines of code.
>
> Øyvind> Perhaps later the code could be refactored to share more
> "Øyvind" == Øyvind Harboe writes:
Øyvind> To me this patch looks reasonable. the .c file is basically a bunch
Øyvind> of parameters and a few lines of code.
Øyvind> Perhaps later the code could be refactored to share more, but
Øyvind> pre 0.4 I think there is something to be said for n
To me this patch looks reasonable. the .c file is basically a bunch
of parameters and a few lines of code.
Perhaps later the code could be refactored to share more, but
pre 0.4 I think there is something to be said for not touching the
existing drivers.
--
Øyvind Harboe
US toll free 1-866-980-34
> "David" == David Brownell writes:
Hi,
>> doc/openocd.texi | 3 ++-
>> src/flash/nand/Makefile.am | 1 +
>> src/flash/nand/driver.c | 2 ++
>> src/flash/nand/{s3c2443.c => s3c6400.c} | 28
Davi
On Monday 11 January 2010, Peter Korsgaard wrote:
> Identical to the existing 2412/2443 support except for the base address
> and NFCONF value (bit 2 is reserved and should be written as 1 ref UM).
>
> Tested on a s3c6410 board, but controller is identical in 6400/6410
> except for 8bit MLC ECC su
Identical to the existing 2412/2443 support except for the base address
and NFCONF value (bit 2 is reserved and should be written as 1 ref UM).
Tested on a s3c6410 board, but controller is identical in 6400/6410
except for 8bit MLC ECC support in 6410 which isn't supported by the
driver.
Signed-o
