On Friday 28 August 2009, Magnus Lundin wrote:
> The really important thing now is that there are several people
> working on and testing these things.
Yep; I did a sanity check on one 3430 board and it
was already improved over what I first saw!
__
Sorry for double responses but it is getting late and my brain is going
to sleep on its own.
>
Holger Freyther wrote:
>
> I sincerely disagree here. These bits directly come out of the Cortex A8
> Technical Reference Manual and not following them is not making things fast
> but it makes them
Holger Freyther wrote:
> On Friday 28 August 2009 19:28:50 Magnus Lundin wrote:
>
>
>> The usual way for OpenOCD targets to check if a PROCESSOR_HALTED flag
>> has been set is not to do it in the halt command but rather in the poll
>> command.
>> This in general improves performance when using l
On Friday 28 August 2009 19:28:50 Magnus Lundin wrote:
> The usual way for OpenOCD targets to check if a PROCESSOR_HALTED flag
> has been set is not to do it in the halt command but rather in the poll
> command.
> This in general improves performance when using long roundtrip
> interfaces like USB
Holger Freyther wrote:
> Hey,
>
> today Matt Hsu and me sat together to look into why OpenOCD does not work on
> the beagle board. We have found and fixed some issues with the code, it
> should
> make it more robust and we have fixed the root cause for us.
>
> cortex_a8_dap_read_coreregister_u32
Holger Freyther wrote:
> On Thursday 27 August 2009 16:43:34 Dirk Behme wrote:
>
>> Holger Freyther wrote:
>>
>
>
>>> Okay, turns out that I'm not able to omap3_dbginit scan once the linux
>>> kernel is running and when linux is starts the "poll" will start to fail.
>>> Does this sound f
On Thursday 27 August 2009 16:43:34 Dirk Behme wrote:
> Holger Freyther wrote:
> > Okay, turns out that I'm not able to omap3_dbginit scan once the linux
> > kernel is running and when linux is starts the "poll" will start to fail.
> > Does this sound familiar? Do you guys have any ideas?
>
> Hmm,
Holger Freyther wrote:
> On Thursday 27 August 2009 07:04:22 Dirk Behme wrote:
>> Holger Freyther wrote:
>>> Hey,
>>>
>>> today Matt Hsu and me sat together to look into why OpenOCD does not work
>>> on the beagle board. We have found and fixed some issues with the code,
>>> it should make it more
Holger Freyther wrote:
> On Thursday 27 August 2009 07:04:22 you wrote:
>> Holger Freyther wrote:
>>> Hey,
>>>
>>> today Matt Hsu and me sat together to look into why OpenOCD does not work
>>> on the beagle board. We have found and fixed some issues with the code,
>>> it should make it more robust
On Thursday 27 August 2009 07:04:22 Dirk Behme wrote:
> Holger Freyther wrote:
> > Hey,
> >
> > today Matt Hsu and me sat together to look into why OpenOCD does not work
> > on the beagle board. We have found and fixed some issues with the code,
> > it should make it more robust and we have fixed t
On Thursday 27 August 2009 07:04:22 you wrote:
> Holger Freyther wrote:
> > Hey,
> >
> > today Matt Hsu and me sat together to look into why OpenOCD does not work
> > on the beagle board. We have found and fixed some issues with the code,
> > it should make it more robust and we have fixed the root
Holger Freyther wrote:
> Hey,
>
> today Matt Hsu and me sat together to look into why OpenOCD does not work on
> the beagle board. We have found and fixed some issues with the code, it
> should
> make it more robust and we have fixed the root cause for us.
>
> cortex_a8_dap_read_coreregister_u
Committed.
Thanks!
--
Øyvind Harboe
Embedded software and hardware consulting services
http://www.zylin.com
___
Openocd-development mailing list
Openocd-development@lists.berlios.de
https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/openocd-development
David Brownell wrote:
> On Wednesday 26 August 2009, Holger Freyther wrote:
>> today Matt Hsu and me sat together to look into why OpenOCD does not work on
>> the beagle board. We have found and fixed some issues with the code, it
>> should
>> make it more robust and we have fixed the root cause
On Wednesday 26 August 2009, Holger Freyther wrote:
> today Matt Hsu and me sat together to look into why OpenOCD does not work on
> the beagle board. We have found and fixed some issues with the code, it
> should
> make it more robust and we have fixed the root cause for us.
Cool! Could you m
Great work!
I'll commit it sooner rather than later if I don't hear any protests.
(I'm not following the Cortex A8 development or testing anything, I just
try to commit things readily to keep the Cortex A8 development moving
forward)
--
Øyvind Harboe
Embedded software and hardware consulting se
Hey,
today Matt Hsu and me sat together to look into why OpenOCD does not work on
the beagle board. We have found and fixed some issues with the code, it should
make it more robust and we have fixed the root cause for us.
cortex_a8_dap_read_coreregister_u32 only returned 0x0 for the registers,
17 matches
Mail list logo
