Re: [Openocd-development] [PATCH] Cmake part 2

2009-04-14 Thread Dick Hollenbeck
Nico Coesel wrote: > Here is another grazy idea regarding build tools: how about adding > Eclipse project definitions? From experience I know that Eclipse > projects can be transferred between Windows and Linux without problems. > > I agree the autotools aren't ideal especially when cross-compiling

Re: [Openocd-development] [PATCH] Cmake part 2

2009-04-14 Thread Nico Coesel
lists.berlios.de > [mailto:openocd-development-boun...@lists.berlios.de] Namens > Dick Hollenbeck > Verzonden: dinsdag 14 april 2009 14:02 > Aan: Openocd-Dev > Onderwerp: [Openocd-development] [PATCH] Cmake part 2 > > > This adds > > config.h.cmake > >

[Openocd-development] [PATCH] Cmake part 2

2009-04-14 Thread Dick Hollenbeck
This adds config.h.cmake which was missing in the first patch. It seems that I will need help getting this committed. CMake fans please step forward and make your voices heard. CMake has been accused of being off the beaten path. From my perspective, those that take the auto