Here is another grazy idea regarding build tools: how about adding Eclipse project definitions? From experience I know that Eclipse projects can be transferred between Windows and Linux without problems.
I agree the autotools aren't ideal especially when cross-compiling. When cross compiling software the biggest problem usually is getting the configure script to work right. A lot of programmers seem to completely forget about cross compiling at all. Even openocd doesn't cross compile out of the box. > -----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- > Van: openocd-development-boun...@lists.berlios.de > [mailto:openocd-development-boun...@lists.berlios.de] Namens > Dick Hollenbeck > Verzonden: dinsdag 14 april 2009 14:02 > Aan: Openocd-Dev > Onderwerp: [Openocd-development] [PATCH] Cmake part 2 > > > This adds > > config.h.cmake > > > which was missing in the first patch. > > > It seems that I will need help getting this committed. > > > CMake fans please step forward and make your voices heard. > CMake has been accused of being off the beaten path. > > > From my perspective, those that take the autotools path are > the ones being beaten. > > > It is not a problem to support two build tools for an > indefinite period in time. The space in the repository is free. > > > Dick > > > _______________________________________________ Openocd-development mailing list Openocd-development@lists.berlios.de https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/openocd-development
