On Monday 08 March 2010, Michal Demin wrote:
> New patch attached. (also available here
I just merged that.
Let's make sure we get some user/test reports on this before we ship... :)
___
Openocd-development mailing list
Openocd-development@lists.berli
On Sunday 07 March 2010, Øyvind Harboe wrote:
> What's checkpatch?
>
http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=blob;f=scripts/checkpatch.pl;h=a4d74344d805610a67e0e7e0bbf1674875f555a7;hb=HEAD
___
Openocd-development mailing list
On Mon, Mar 8, 2010 at 3:54 AM, David Brownell wrote:
> On Sunday 07 March 2010, Michal Demin wrote:
>> Copy of this patch can by
>> downloaded here: http://robot.mysteria.cz/buspirate.patch
>
> Better ... I can apply that one.
>
> I attach a version with minor fixes, mostly from running "checkpat
On Mon, Mar 8, 2010 at 3:54 AM, David Brownell wrote:
> On Sunday 07 March 2010, Michal Demin wrote:
>> Copy of this patch can by
>> downloaded here: http://robot.mysteria.cz/buspirate.patch
>
> Better ... I can apply that one.
>
> I attach a version with minor fixes, mostly from running "checkpat
On Sunday 07 March 2010, Michal Demin wrote:
> Copy of this patch can by
> downloaded here: http://robot.mysteria.cz/buspirate.patch
Better ... I can apply that one.
I attach a version with minor fixes, mostly from running "checkpatch"
so it's whitespace and linelength stuff. But also added a NEW
Adds support for buspirate jtag interface. Copy of this patch can by
downloaded here: http://robot.mysteria.cz/buspirate.patch
diff --git a/configure.in b/configure.in
index 3b0a06d..d93b21a 100644
--- a/configure.in
+++ b/configure.in
@@ -474,6 +474,10 @@ AC_ARG_ENABLE(arm-jtag-ew,
AS_HELP_STR
> OpenOCD for PIC32 should be able to help Microchip to
> get into more users' hands.
No evidence of Microchip thinking along those lines :-)
--
Øyvind Harboe
Visit us at Embedded World, March 2nd-4th. IS2T's stand, HALL 10 - 118
http://www.zylin.com/events_embeddedworld.html
US toll free 1-8
On Mon, Mar 1, 2010 at 5:17 PM, Øyvind Harboe wrote:
>> But the official PIC32 GCC compiler comes with proprietary
>> C libraries from Microchip (together with MIPS).
>
> I tried to build some test code and immediately ran into this,
> which quelled my enthusiasm for doing any further OpenOCD
> wo
> But the official PIC32 GCC compiler comes with proprietory
> C libraries from Microchip (together with MIPS).
I tried to build some test code and immediately ran into this,
which quelled my enthusiasm for doing any further OpenOCD
work.
> Personally I think Microchip is wrong to choose the MIPS
On Monday 01 March 2010, Ian wrote:
> Are you familiar with the ST and TI licensing? Thanks for the
> suggestion. I'm going to look into it a little more, I'm about to start
> a few ARM projects.
I don't know about ST's licensing for its CM3 software.
TI inherited some rather antagonistic licen
On Mon, Mar 1, 2010 at 4:21 PM, Ian wrote:
> Are you familiar with the ST and TI licensing? Thanks for the suggestion.
> I'm going to look into it a little more, I'm about to start a few ARM
> projects.
I will think they are similar to what Microchip has. Anyway, you
can look at them.
> I've see
On Sunday 28 February 2010, Ian wrote:
> The best reference page for the Bus Pirate is probably the manual:
> http://dangerousprototypes.com/bus-pirate-manual/
If so, the next iteration of this patch should use it. :)
> Microchip's 16bit compilers are gcc-based, but you're correct that
> vanil
Are you familiar with the ST and TI licensing? Thanks for the
suggestion. I'm going to look into it a little more, I'm about to start
a few ARM projects.
I've seen the other copies of the Microchip stack too. I've even seen
lots of copies 'relicensed' to GPL, but the license isn't OSI
compati
On Mon, Mar 1, 2010 at 4:10 PM, Øyvind Harboe wrote:
> I tinkered a bit with Microchip 32 bit MIPS CPUs, but although Microchip
> rely on GCC, I didn't get a sense of enthusiasm for developers going
> off and using anything but Microchip tools...
That is right, especially when PIC32 support in Op
I tinkered a bit with Microchip 32 bit MIPS CPUs, but although Microchip
rely on GCC, I didn't get a sense of enthusiasm for developers going
off and using anything but Microchip tools...
They could (gasp!) write code that could build & run on *any* CPU next,
especially if they use some minimall O
On Mon, Mar 1, 2010 at 3:56 PM, Ian wrote:
> How's the USB driver situation with the M3?
Should be quite good. ST and TI/Luminary both provides USB sample codes.
> There are plenty of Microchip
> USB chips, probably an even cheaper solution than an M3, but there's
> currently no open source USB
On Mon, Mar 1, 2010 at 1:33 PM, David Brownell wrote:
> That said ... I think I'd be interested in something like
> one of those, but powered by some USB-equipped Cortex-M3.
> (Or maybe even some kind of AVR). Compared to the current
> FT232 + PIC24 combo, the chip costs would be lower, and the
The best reference page for the Bus Pirate is probably the manual:
http://dangerousprototypes.com/bus-pirate-manual/
Microchip's 16bit compilers are gcc-based, but you're correct that
vanilla gcc won't compile for the PIC. I went with the 24FJ chip because
it has a peripheral pin select cross-b
On Saturday 27 February 2010, Michal Demin wrote:
> +++ b/tcl/interface/buspirate.cfg
> @@ -0,0 +1,16 @@
> +#
> +# Buspirate with OpenOCD support
> +#
> +# http://dangerousprototypes.com/category/bus-pirate/
> +#
> +
Ignoring the code, for the moment ... that blog is the only
reference you give t
On Thursday 25 February 2010, Michal Demin wrote:
> Adds initial support for Buspirate as Jtag interface
I hopee we should only look at the second pach you posted...
___
Openocd-development mailing list
Openocd-development@lists.berlios.de
https://lists
Adds initial support for Buspirate as Jtag interface
---
configure.in | 11 +
doc/openocd.texi |3 +
src/jtag/drivers/Makefile.am |3 +
src/jtag/drivers/buspirate.c | 981 ++
src/jtag/interfaces.c|6 +
tcl/
21 matches
Mail list logo
