lou.openocd...@fixit.nospammail.net wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 06, 2009 at 12:36:52PM +0100, freddie_cho...@op.pl wrote:
>> I'm using openocd-0.1.0 for Windows
>>
>> I got the STM32F10X-128k-EVAL board with the original RLink. I can debug the
>> primer1, which has the Rlink embedded. I connect to the cu
811.hex in
9.243969s (1.069954 kb/s)
That's pretty awful! I'm sure it used to be better? Anyway, it's a non-STM32
Cortex part as Øyvind requested.
I've attached the config file that I'm using.
Cheers,
Rob.
> On Tue, Feb 24, 2009 at 5:04 AM, Rob Brown wrote:
>>
Øyvind Harboe wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 24, 2009 at 9:30 AM, SimonQian wrote:
>> My adaptor is Versaloon(USB2.0 FullSpeed), it's more slower.
>> jtag_khz 565
>> flash write_image
>> C:/Projects/FreeRTOS/Demo/CORTEX_STM32Fxxx_Eclipse/RTOSDemo/RTOSDemo.bin
>> 0x0800 bin
>> wrote 27464 byte from fil
Øyvind Harboe wrote:
> I'm seing pitiful performance when programming STM32 flash(9kBytes/s).
>
> It appears OpenOCD uses most of it's time in target_wait_state(), haven't
> really done much investigations yet.
>
> Has anyone done any work / measurements on Cortex target_write_memory()/
> flash p
