his is likely
> to be much more difficult to track. Is it easily reproducible? If so,
> could you set a breakpoint cfi.c:1196 and look at the value in
> reg_params[0].value. Then, set a breakpoint at cfi.c:1277 and look at the
> same variable. Is the value the same?
>
> R
ste the results here. The output from openocd
> from before the segfault would be useful as well.
>
> Rick
>
>
> On Nov 6, 2008, at 6:59 AM, Federico Spadini wrote:
>
>> Hi Oyvind,
>> I agree wholeheartedly. I'm looking into it... I'm going to probably
>
quot;
- Albert Einstein
On Thu, Nov 6, 2008 at 2:45 PM, Øyvind Harboe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 6, 2008 at 2:17 PM, Federico Spadini <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Hey Guys,
>> So to respond, r826 is the first point of failure I found (825 works
>>
ailure starts with that
> revision, it helps narrow down the problem. That said, the various patches
> that have been committed to the repository in the last few days have
> resolved numerous bugs that could manifest themselves as your bug. Try with
> the current SVN HEAD and see if
cale!
>
>>
>> Thanks a bunch,
>> Federico
>>
>> "Anyone who has never made a mistake has never tried anything new."
>> - Albert Einstein
>>
>>
>>
>> On Fri, Oct 31, 2008 at 1:51 PM, Øyvind Harboe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote
