On Thu, Oct 27, 2011 at 11:24 AM, Christopher Harvey
wrote:
> I read a thread about somebody who apparently got cortex m0 cores working
> with OpenOCD. (based on the m3 code). Did that patch ever get posted
> somewhere? Anybody following/working on m0 right now?
The Cortex M0 support will most li
I read a thread about somebody who apparently got cortex m0 cores
working with OpenOCD. (based on the m3 code). Did that patch ever get
posted somewhere? Anybody following/working on m0 right now?
___
Openocd-development mailing list
Openocd-developmen
On Thu, Oct 27, 2011 at 10:14 AM, Richard LIU wrote:
> Thanks a lot, xiaofan.
> My chip is MSM7x27A. If it does not support, I try to port it.
>
Ah I see. This seems to be a very new chip and indeed seems to be
based on Cortex A5 core based on Google.
http://forum.beyond3d.com/showthread.php?t=60
Thanks a lot, xiaofan.
My chip is MSM7x27A. If it does not support, I try to port it.
Best Regards
Richard LIU
On Wed, Oct 26, 2011 at 5:01 PM, Xiaofan Chen wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 26, 2011 at 11:04 AM, Richard LIU
> wrote:
> > Does openocd support cortex A5?
>
> The answer seems to be no.
> Any
This is an automated email from Gerrit.
Jim Norris (u17...@att.net) just uploaded a new patch set to Gerrit, which you
can find at http://openocd.zylin.com/127
-- gerrit
commit 3dec47dff267332a638fc8d84702d3658344a51a
Author: Jim Norris
Date: Wed Oct 26 19:30:20 2011 -0500
Remove use of
jim norris wrote:
Pushing to ssh://jnor...@openocd.zylinx.com:29418/openocd.git
Typo, there's an extra x in the domain name. Run:
git config remote.review.url ssh://jnor...@openocd.zylin.com:29418/openocd.git
And then try git push review again.
Dolt! Thanks!
__
jim norris wrote:
> Pushing to ssh://jnor...@openocd.zylinx.com:29418/openocd.git
Typo, there's an extra x in the domain name. Run:
git config remote.review.url ssh://jnor...@openocd.zylin.com:29418/openocd.git
And then try git push review again.
//Peter
___
Pete Batard wrote:
> Git is just a tool, feel free to use it as you see fit, GUI or not.
Yes and no. Git is a tool, and of course there are good and bad GUIs,
but the point is that since it's common to work together with others,
and since this is also the setting where git really shines, it's a
go
There's no "x" in the url.
openocd.zylin.com
> -Original Message-
> From: openocd-development-boun...@lists.berlios.de [mailto:openocd-
> development-boun...@lists.berlios.de] On Behalf Of jim norris
> Sent: Wednesday, October 26, 2011 6:49 PM
> To: Spencer Oliver
> Cc: Openocd-developme
Here's the verbose output.
$ git push -v review
Pushing to ssh://jnor...@openocd.zylinx.com:29418/openocd.git
ssh: connect to host openocd.zylinx.com port 29418: Connection timed out
fatal: The remote end hung up unexpectedly
___
Openocd-developme
On 27/10/2011 00:13, jim norris wrote:
try now
Nope. Still hangs.
working fine this end, so unsure what to suggest
Spen
___
Openocd-development mailing list
Openocd-development@lists.berlios.de
https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/openocd-de
try now
Nope. Still hangs.
___
Openocd-development mailing list
Openocd-development@lists.berlios.de
https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/openocd-development
On 27/10/2011 00:10, jim norris wrote:
I'm trying to do a 'git push review' and it just hangs.
___
Openocd-development mailing list
Openocd-development@lists.berlios.de
https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/openocd-development
try now
___
I'm trying to do a 'git push review' and it just hangs.
___
Openocd-development mailing list
Openocd-development@lists.berlios.de
https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/openocd-development
On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 06:52:39PM -0500, jim norris wrote:
> For those using a git gui, what are you using?
I find 'gitk' on Linux to be the best choice (for me) when I
need/want a GUI, but I do most stuff on the command line.
Uwe.
--
http://hermann-uwe.de | http://sigrok.org
http://random
This is an automated email from Gerrit.
?yvind Harboe (oyvindhar...@gmail.com) just uploaded a new patch set to Gerrit,
which you can find at http://openocd.zylin.com/126
-- gerrit
commit a6334c6b1313f2bb925f48da73ff6f3c66d5bc5f
Author: Øyvind Harboe
Date: Wed Oct 26 22:26:44 2011 +0200
On 2011.10.26 16:29, Peter Stuge wrote:
Øyvind Harboe wrote:
my main problem has been that that I've found that those that use Tortoise
have no patience for the complexities and necessity of interactive rebase,
rather than Tortoise lack of support for this feature.
This might fit Pete. In anot
> -Original Message-
> From: openocd-development-boun...@lists.berlios.de [mailto:openocd-
> development-boun...@lists.berlios.de] On Behalf Of Pete Batard
> Sent: Wednesday, October 26, 2011 6:26 AM
> To: openocd-development@lists.berlios.de
> Subject: Re: [Openocd-development] git gui
>
Just wanted to let everybody know that I received my Amontec JTAGKey Tiny
this morning. I never received any notification that it has been shipped or
any replies to any of my inquiries but I did receive the item.
-Ananda
On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 8:49 AM, Ananda Regmi wrote:
> Thanks for your inpu
Øyvind Harboe wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 26, 2011 at 3:09 PM, jim norris wrote:
> >
> >
> > Assuming I've done my commits. How do I see what the
> > patch will look like before I do the 'git push review'?
>
> git format-patch origin/master
>
> => produces patch files
I would recommend using git log
I have a problems with a GUI that makes git easy to use at the
cost of not enabling and teaching the user to use the more advanced
concepts.
Interactive rebasing is an absolute must when working with git. Anything
that leaves the user with the impression that he doesn't have to get
his head around
Øyvind Harboe wrote:
> my main problem has been that that I've found that those that use Tortoise
> have no patience for the complexities and necessity of interactive rebase,
> rather than Tortoise lack of support for this feature.
This might fit Pete. In another project I've learned that he prefe
On Wed, Oct 26, 2011 at 3:14 PM, jim norris wrote:
>
>
> How does gerrit determine whether a patch is a subsequent
> patch for a file?
You update the commit and keep the change-id in the commit
comment and do a git push review.
I don't know if that's what you're asking.
git rebase interative al
How does gerrit determine whether a patch is a subsequent
patch for a file? Or maybe the better question is: Are the steps
outlined by Alex the only means to submit an amended patch?
___
Openocd-development mailing list
Openocd-development@lists.berl
On 26 October 2011 13:35, Attila Kinali wrote:
> Moin,
>
> Would it possible to have gerrit comments as mails to the mailinglist
> as well?
>
This is down to taste - some would class lots of gerrit emails spam.
My suggestion is to watch the openocd project in gerrit, enabling emails there:
http:
On Wed, Oct 26, 2011 at 3:09 PM, jim norris wrote:
>
>
> Assuming I've done my commits. How do I see what the
> patch will look like before I do the 'git push review'?
git format-patch origin/master
=> produces patch files
--
Øyvind Harboe - Can Zylin Consulting help on your project?
US t
How about going to openocd.zylin.com and checking which patches are
still outstanding every few days?
--
Øyvind Harboe - Can Zylin Consulting help on your project?
US toll free 1-866-980-3434
http://www.zylin.com/
___
Openocd-development mailing list
O
Assuming I've done my commits. How do I see what the
patch will look like before I do the 'git push review'?
___
Openocd-development mailing list
Openocd-development@lists.berlios.de
https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/openocd-development
Moin,
Would it possible to have gerrit comments as mails to the mailinglist
as well?
My usual way of working is to go over a developement mailinglist once
every few days (when time permits) and check what has been going on.
When i see a patch that looks interesting, i go and check what has
to be
On 25/10/11 15:20, Alexander Stein wrote:
> On Monday 24 October 2011 20:24:57 billium wrote:
>> I am trying to update openocd but it fails to build:
>>
>> In function `Jim_Nvp_name2value_obj':
>> jim-nvp.c:(.text+0xc7): undefined reference to `Jim_String'
>>
>> This is repeated four times for othe
Hi Pete,
thanks for the corrections about my prejudice against Tortoise. I guess
my main problem has been that that I've found that those that use Tortoise
have no patience for the complexities and necessity of interactive rebase,
rather than Tortoise lack of support for this feature.
Gerrit is a
On 2011.10.26 06:07, Øyvind Harboe wrote:
On Wed, Oct 26, 2011 at 2:12 AM, Peter Stuge wrote:
jim norris wrote:
For those using a git gui, what are you using?
On which system?
For Windows, there is Git Extensions and TortoiseGit. The Git
Extensions looked less slick than TortoiseGit last ti
On Wed, Oct 26, 2011 at 11:04 AM, Richard LIU wrote:
> Does openocd support cortex A5?
The answer seems to be no.
Any public resource for A5 chips in real world other than the information
from ARM?
The only one seems to be from Freescale, A5 + M4 hybrid core.
http://www.engadget.com/2011/10/25/f
33 matches
Mail list logo
