Øyvind Harboe wrote:
> my main problem has been that that I've found that those that use Tortoise
> have no patience for the complexities and necessity of interactive rebase,
> rather than Tortoise lack of support for this feature.

This might fit Pete. In another project I've learned that he prefers
not to use many of the features offered by git, among others indeed
interactive rebase and the quick and easy way to deal with branches -
and in that case TortoiseGit can of course work fine.

I've evaluated Tortoise together with multiple developers who use
Windows and it never ended up as the prefered tool, simply because
it didn't have wanted features. If it has all features *you* want
then of course it's as good a pick as any other, but at the time
we looked at it, it wasn't really useful for taking advantage of git,
and everyone picked Git Extensions or git bash instead. Some of the
guys especially like that Git Extensions integrates at all with
Visual Studio.


//Peter
_______________________________________________
Openocd-development mailing list
Openocd-development@lists.berlios.de
https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/openocd-development

Reply via email to