Not a lot of people can match Zach's coding abilities. The OpenOCD
community is extremely fortunate to have had his influence and code.
Especially the longer terms effects of his foresight, code quality and
presence.
--
Øyvind Harboe
Can Zylin Consulting help on your project?
US toll free 1-86
On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 2:42 PM, Øyvind Harboe wrote:
>>> It is impossible to relicense OpenOCD as it would require all
>>> copyright holders to agree to linking + exception, which they don't.
>>
>> Yes that is the outcome and I respect the decision. We are all
>> not lawyers and it may well be tr
On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 8:35 AM, Xiaofan Chen wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 1:44 PM, Øyvind Harboe
> wrote:
>>> Looking at the list, this somehow reminds me of those heated
>>> discussions about GPL and D2XX.
>>> https://lists.berlios.de/pipermail/openocd-development/2009-June/thread.html
>>>
On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 1:44 PM, Øyvind Harboe wrote:
>> Looking at the list, this somehow reminds me of those heated
>> discussions about GPL and D2XX.
>> https://lists.berlios.de/pipermail/openocd-development/2009-June/thread.html
>>
>> Last one by Zach Welsh.
>> http://lists.berlios.de/pipermai
On 14/06/2011, at 3:45 PM, Øyvind Harboe wrote:
> Hi Steve,
>
> I intend to upgrade OpenOCD to the latest release once it is
> available.
>
> Thanks for your efforts!
Sounds good. It wouldn't hurt to test it *before* the release, just
in case there is a problem and I can include fix it before t
Hi Steve,
I intend to upgrade OpenOCD to the latest release once it is
available.
Thanks for your efforts!
--
Øyvind Harboe
Can Zylin Consulting help on your project?
US toll free 1-866-980-3434 / International +47 51 87 40 27
http://www.zylin.com/zy1000.html
ARM7 ARM9 ARM11 XScale Cortex
J
On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 4:38 AM, Xiaofan Chen wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 12, 2011 at 5:16 PM, Øyvind Harboe
> wrote:
>> I'll update the berlios and sourceforge to reflect the active
>> maintainers. We would of course be delighted if anyone
>> below decides to take a more active role again and re-enabl
On Sun, Jun 12, 2011 at 5:16 PM, Øyvind Harboe wrote:
> I'll update the berlios and sourceforge to reflect the active
> maintainers. We would of course be delighted if anyone
> below decides to take a more active role again and re-enabling
> them is quickly done.
>
> Lately Spencer Oliver and I ha
FYI.
This release will include a number of bug fixes in addition
to a small number of added features.
It might be worth updating the version of Jim Tcl used by the OpenOCD.
Cheers,
Steve
Begin forwarded message:
> From: Steve Bennett
> Date: 10 June 2011 2:55:01 PM AEST
> To: Jim Devel
> Subj
It has been a while and I think my msys is quite out of date. Have reverted
to building on Linux.
Thanks.
- Original Message -
From: "Freddie Chopin"
To:
Sent: Monday, June 13, 2011 4:22 PM
Subject: Re: [Openocd-development] Status of building using Mingw64?
OpenOCD versions from
On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 10:10 PM, Tomek CEDRO wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 7:53 PM, Øyvind Harboe
> wrote:
>> We never will merge 0.5.0 release branch into the master branch, ideally
>> it would receive zero, but realistically might receive a few commits.
>> Possibly reverting commits in mas
On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 7:53 PM, Øyvind Harboe wrote:
> We never will merge 0.5.0 release branch into the master branch, ideally
> it would receive zero, but realistically might receive a few commits.
> Possibly reverting commits in master branch?
Yeah now I know how things work. Just wanted to f
On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 9:46 PM, Tomek CEDRO wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 6:42 PM, Øyvind Harboe
> wrote:
>> I'll update master branch.
>>
>> The way git works we don't cut development branches, we just
>> keep working on master branch.
>>
>> We may cut a 0.5 branch from some previous time i
On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 6:42 PM, Øyvind Harboe wrote:
> I'll update master branch.
>
> The way git works we don't cut development branches, we just
> keep working on master branch.
>
> We may cut a 0.5 branch from some previous time in master
> history later on.
Ah, there is 0.4.0 so anyone can s
Merged.
--
Øyvind Harboe
Can Zylin Consulting help on your project?
US toll free 1-866-980-3434 / International +47 51 87 40 27
http://www.zylin.com/zy1000.html
ARM7 ARM9 ARM11 XScale Cortex
JTAG debugger and flash programmer
___
Openocd-development
On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 7:32 PM, Tomek CEDRO wrote:
> Hey Oyvind! Thank you for support in this matter! Just please add
> those patches to new branch v0.5 as they bring general code
> reorganization and are not part of 0.4.x :-)
I'll update master branch.
The way git works we don't cut developme
Hey Oyvind! Thank you for support in this matter! Just please add
those patches to new branch v0.5 as they bring general code
reorganization and are not part of 0.4.x :-)
--
CeDeROM, SQ7MHZ, http://www.tomek.cedro.info
___
Openocd-development mailing l
On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 2:33 PM, Øyvind Harboe wrote:
> ignore this patch. I sent it out by accident.
Haha :-) Anyway I tihnk this git submodule stuff should be places
_before_ autotools invocation, as the autotools use git submodules and
will produce errors when they are not in place... :-)
--
as we introduce swd and jtag as two transports, we want
to start up with a new transport folder to organize the
code a bit.
---
configure.in|1 +
src/Makefile.am |2 ++
src/jtag/Makefile.am|2 --
src/jtag/adapter.c
as we introduce swd and jtag as two transports, we want
to start up with a new transport folder to organize the
code a bit.
---
configure.in|1 +
src/Makefile.am |2 ++
src/jtag/Makefile.am|2 --
src/jtag/adapter.c
Øyvind,
could you please remake the patch adding the flags "-M -C" to git
format-patch and post it again?
These flags will detect the file move/rename and highlight just the
modifications.
Patch review would be much easier.
Thank you
Antonio
On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 10:21 PM, Øyvind Harboe wrote:
OpenOCD versions from my website ( www.freddiechopin.info ) - 32- and
64-bit, the most recent one is a week old - are built with this
compiler, but with the most recent version (GCC 4.7.0) and on Linux, as
I found that easier than using Cygwin or MSYS directly in Windows.
4\/3!!
ignore this patch. I sent it out by accident.
On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 4:01 PM, Øyvind Harboe wrote:
> From: CeDeROM
>
> ---
> bootstrap | 27 ++-
> 1 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/bootstrap b/bootstrap
> index 0965245..7062fc0 100755
as we introduce swd and jtag as two transports, we want
to start up with a new transport folder to organize the
code a bit.
---
configure.in |1 +
src/Makefile.am |2 +
src/jtag/Makefile.am |2 -
src/jtag/adapter.c|2 +-
src/jtag/core.c
From: CeDeROM
---
bootstrap | 27 ++-
1 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
diff --git a/bootstrap b/bootstrap
index 0965245..7062fc0 100755
--- a/bootstrap
+++ b/bootstrap
@@ -1,9 +1,14 @@
-<<< HEAD
-#!/bin/sh
-===
#!/bin/sh -e
-#fetch necessar
From: CeDeROM
---
bootstrap | 27 ++-
1 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
diff --git a/bootstrap b/bootstrap
index 0965245..7062fc0 100755
--- a/bootstrap
+++ b/bootstrap
@@ -1,9 +1,14 @@
-<<< HEAD
-#!/bin/sh
-===
#!/bin/sh -e
-#fetch necessar
Just to clarify: this patch does nothing, it just moves files around.
It makes subsequent swd patches less noisy.
--
Øyvind Harboe
Can Zylin Consulting help on your project?
US toll free 1-866-980-3434 / International +47 51 87 40 27
http://www.zylin.com/zy1000.html
ARM7 ARM9 ARM11 XScale Cor
Probably you want to update your MinGW-w64 installation. Under
Windows, TDM64 is the preferred one to use or you can use Cygwin's
MinGW-w64 cross compiler.
Probably. My GCC is 4.5.0. I suspect this is the issue since you are
reporting "gcc version 4.5.2 (GCC)".
I got past the original issue
On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 8:45 PM, Liam Redmond (Rock Software)
wrote:
> 1) Anyone else attempting to build using mingw64 and have any gems of
> wisdom?
> 2) Is it possible to build without Jim so I can come back to this problem
> another day?
>
> Perhaps I need to do a lot of reconfiguring of my bu
Hi,
It's been a long time since I built openocd (0.3.0), I used to build with
mingw64 and it worked fine, I've tried today to get the latest and build it
under the same environment I used before and I get some errors. So I have a
couple of questions...
The fist problem I get is in the "Jim"
On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 8:25 AM, Øyvind Harboe wrote:
> it's great that your focusing on functionality. Cracking the
> technical problems and making a patch series that's right
> for OpenOCD are two hard problems. Perhaps better
> attack one at the time?
exactly. producing smaller patches only co
Hi Tomek,
it's great that your focusing on functionality. Cracking the
technical problems and making a patch series that's right
for OpenOCD are two hard problems. Perhaps better
attack one at the time?
One hard thing about SWD is to crack the technical problems,
the other hard thing is to create
32 matches
Mail list logo
