I would like to push these changes.
https://lists.berlios.de/pipermail/openocd-development/2010-February/014638.html
There was some discussion to add a capability for interfaces to
override a fn pointer to implement specific fn's more efficiently, but
that mechanism does not exist yet and it is a
On Saturday 20 February 2010, Rolf Meeser wrote:
> A target script defines a "reset-end" handler. In this handler I need to read
> a few words from target memory. When I try to use "ocd_mem2array", the
> command fails with
> Error: 357 1442 target.c:3106 jim_mem2array(): mem2array: no command con
On Sunday 21 February 2010, Xiaofan Chen wrote:
> I think the LM3S1968 is like other Luminary boards and
> the default ICDI layout works fine since the default config
> file works fine (the JTAG frequency may need to be lowered
> for certain OS or certain USB ports).
This suggests to me that succe
On Mon, Feb 22, 2010 at 10:01 AM, David Brownell wrote:
> So far as I'm aware, all *current* Luminary boards should
> use the same ft2232 layout -- just like the "ICDI" boards.
> But the old LM3S811 eval boards should use "evb_lm3s811"
> since they're not quite the same.
>
> I don't happen to know
On Thursday 18 February 2010, Xiaofan Chen wrote:
> What does it do right now? Just finding out the interface? I actually
> have the Luminary EK-LM3S1968 instead of LM3S811.
Looks like it's looking at the USB vendor and product IDs,
which for "luminary" and "luminary-lm3s811" are the same
(just lo
Archives are in the Berlios and SourceForge "files" areas.
Mainline git is now tagged as "0.5.0-dev"; the merge window
is open. If we need a bugfix release, it'll branch off from
the commit with the "0.4.0" tag.
I've committed a few patches from my pending queue, most
notably:
- Making the ARM
On Sun, Feb 21, 2010 at 4:51 PM, simon qian wrote:
> Does SWD related protocol of J-Link open to the public?
>
No I do not think so. J-Link is a proprietary product from Segger.
There are some documentation from Segger but it is not
really complete. I can see the support of J-Link in OpenOCD
most
On Mon, Feb 22, 2010 at 4:52 AM, Spencer Oliver wrote:
> On 21/02/2010 08:49, simon qian wrote:
>> Hi,
>> As I know, ST-Link supports JTAG for STM32 and SWIM for STM8, but it
>> doesn't support SWD.
>> If you want to reflash STM32 of ST-Link to be supported by OpenOCD, you
>> can try Versaloon dri
On 21/02/2010 08:49, simon qian wrote:
> Hi,
> As I know, ST-Link supports JTAG for STM32 and SWIM for STM8, but it
> doesn't support SWD.
> If you want to reflash STM32 of ST-Link to be supported by OpenOCD, you
> can try Versaloon driver, but you will lost ST-Link's functionality.
>
The ST-LINK
On Sunday 21 February 2010, Arne Pagel wrote:
> > Wait a bit until the "send arbitrary TMS bitsequence"
> > patches get merged, after the 0.5 merge window opens.
> > (I sent a preview a while back. SWD support needs them.)
E.g. if you look at http://repo.or.cz/w/openocd/dave.git in
the "swd" bran
On Sunday 21 February 2010, Arne Pagel wrote:
> > Wait a bit until the "send arbitrary TMS bitsequence"
> > patches get merged, after the 0.5 merge window opens.
> > (I sent a preview a while back. SWD support needs them.)
> >
> > Then define a Stellaris-specific command to use that
> > (assert S
On Sunday 21 February 2010, Arne Pagel wrote:
> Hello,
> perhaps this is my fault but I can't find a hint in the OpenOCD-Docs for
> enabling USB Dongles as
> normal user on Linux Systems.
One hint is in the README file:
==
Installing OpenOCD
==
On Linux,
> Wait a bit until the "send arbitrary TMS bitsequence"
> patches get merged, after the 0.5 merge window opens.
> (I sent a preview a while back. SWD support needs them.)
>
> Then define a Stellaris-specific command to use that
> (assert SRST, do the magic sequences, release SRST,
> wait 400 msec
Hello,
perhaps this is my fault but I can't find a hint in the OpenOCD-Docs for
enabling USB Dongles as
normal user on Linux Systems.
I created a new rule-file for udev to get my Luminary ICDI Board working as
normal user on my ubuntu
system:
/etc/udev/rules.d/99-openocd.rules
# Luminary ICD
SWD is working in my branch of OpenOCD, but ONLY on Versaloon dongle.
Official OpenOCD will maybe add SWD support in 0.5 release.
FT2232H is USB-HS device, I don't think there is any chance for USB-FS STM32
Device to be faster.
But it's almost impossible for FT2232H to support SWIM.
If you want ST
On Sun, Feb 21, 2010 at 8:49 AM, simon qian wrote:
> Hi,
> As I know, ST-Link supports JTAG for STM32 and SWIM for STM8, but it doesn't
> support SWD.
> If you want to reflash STM32 of ST-Link to be supported by OpenOCD, you can
> try Versaloon driver, but you will lost ST-Link's functionality.
O
Does SWD related protocol of J-Link open to the public?
2010/2/19 Piotr Esden-Tempski
> Hi!
>
> On Feb 19, 2010, at 11:36 AM, Xiaofan Chen wrote:
>
> > On Fri, Feb 19, 2010 at 5:00 PM, Spencer Oliver
> wrote:
> >
> >> The latest jlink version i have here is v8.
> >>
> >
> > That is quite new. H
Hi,
As I know, ST-Link supports JTAG for STM32 and SWIM for STM8, but it doesn't
support SWD.
If you want to reflash STM32 of ST-Link to be supported by OpenOCD, you can
try Versaloon driver, but you will lost ST-Link's functionality.
2010/2/20 Michel Catudal
> Le 20/02/2010 00:05, simon qian a
18 matches
Mail list logo
