lou.openocd...@fixit.nospammail.net pisze:
> Thanks for your help with that. Tracing out the standalone RLink
> schematic was critically important for that success.
I was happy to help with the developement of OpenOCD (; thx again for
your patch.
BTW - your patch has been commited to r1410 (;
Dirk Behme wrote:
> http://elinux.org/BeagleBoardOpenOCD
> is updated, too.
> If I missed something there or did it wrong, please correct ;)
>
one thing you should say - *REMINDER* - the OMAP3530 is a 1.8V part -
many JTAG dongles are 3.3V only and that people should *verify* that
their dongle is
On Wed, Mar 11, 2009 at 09:57:57PM +0100, Freddie Chopin wrote:
> ok than, I've done some more testing with real RLink this time. the
> results are exactly the same as for Primer1 - so generaly RLink works
> fine now...
Yay! :)
>
> BTW - RLink is pretty slow... compared to my FT2232 based JTA
>
> Freddie reports that it works with the standalone RLink as
> well as the Primer, which what I was going for, so I'd say
> it's ready for submission assuming nobody objects.
>
>
I have committed the patch - we can sort out issues as (and if) we find
them.
Cheers
Spen
___
On Wed, Mar 11, 2009 at 09:12:43PM -, Spencer Oliver wrote:
>
> > > Asserting SRST via PB5 might work. On both Primers and the
> > standalone
> > > RLink. I may have to end up doing that. It feels wrong,
> > but it may
> > > be the best way. It would remove the need to detect. I am
> > Asserting SRST via PB5 might work. On both Primers and the
> standalone
> > RLink. I may have to end up doing that. It feels wrong,
> but it may
> > be the best way. It would remove the need to detect. I am
> going to
> > pursue this route.
>
> Freddie (and/or anybody else who is
>
> Thanks for pointing it out, not sure why did I miss this one
> with the target_script. But unfortunately I still do get
> errors like: invalid command name "flash_probe". Same goes
> for e.g. flash info but flash bank seems to work just fine for me.
>
It is still supported - the cmd is:
fl
ok than, I've done some more testing with real RLink this time. the
results are exactly the same as for Primer1 - so generaly RLink works
fine now...
BTW - RLink is pretty slow... compared to my FT2232 based JTAG it is
exactly 5 times slower (i compare the time of 100k code upload, same
jtag_k
Duane Ellis wrote:
> ALL -- FYI - 3 beagle board commits.
Tried it and yes, it works out of svn :)
Thanks!
http://elinux.org/BeagleBoardOpenOCD
is updated, too.
If I missed something there or did it wrong, please correct ;)
Many thanks
Dirk
> NOTE: I changed the names of the "cfg" files.
>
On Mar 11, 2009, at 1:28 AM, Petri Pirttinen wrote:
Unfortunately OOCD mocks me about 'invalid command name
"target_script_0"'. I just don't understand why, the same problem
occurs
with e.g. 'flash probe' etc.
I'm probably missing something there but can't figure out what it
is. If
I lea
On Mar 11, 2009, at 1:28 AM, Petri Pirttinen wrote:
Unfortunately OOCD mocks me about 'invalid command name
"target_script_0"'. I just don't understand why, the same problem
occurs
with e.g. 'flash probe' etc.
I'm probably missing something there but can't figure out what it
is. If
I lea
On Tue, Mar 10, 2009 at 11:28:30PM +0100, Freddie Chopin wrote:
> lou.openocd...@fixit.nospammail.net pisze:
> > Freddie (and/or anybody else who is interested in this): Please test the
> > attached patch against svn trunk and see if it works properly with an RLink.
>
> for now I can test only wit
>> Unfortunately OOCD mocks me about 'invalid command name
>> "target_script_0"'. I just don't understand why, the same problem occurs
>> with e.g. 'flash probe' etc.
>>
>> I'm probably missing something there but can't figure out what it is. If
>> I leave out the target_script 0 and shutdown, I ca
13 matches
Mail list logo
