Rick Altherr pisze:
> 1. [...]
OK, i get it [;
> This should have been fixed. How did you get this to build given the
> above problems? Did you build in-tree?
it's a separate issue, as in fact i was building the app in the main
source tree that i took from SVN: bootstrap, configure.., ma
somebody> Is this really generic to all of the OMAP3 parts?
somebody> Who knows?
somebody> I'd expect the IDCODE to be different for each one at least.
somebody> In general, the CPU one.
I don't think that will be the case here. Or maybe I am saying the same
thing but from a different angle.
1
ALL -- FYI - 3 beagle board commits.
NOTE: I changed the names of the "cfg" files.
omap3530 - not omap3
ti_beagleboard - extracted from Dirk's openocd.cfg file
(A)
Modified:
trunk/src/jtag/jtag.c
Log:
Added -endstate to irscan an
> > the exact same commands worked fine earlier. i'm not a
> linux guy, so
> > maybe i'm missing something, but the situation was exactly the same
> > then, and commands worked fine - i was able to compile the code to
> > some other dir
> >
> > 2. when i compile the HEAD with MinGW + MSYS, SVN
On Mar 10, 2009, at 3:34 PM, Freddie Chopin wrote:
i have two issues
1. in the times of 0.1.0 (around r1300) i was able to build the code
'not in the source tree'. i downloaded the HEAD, made some dir inside,
and was able to do:
../bootstrap
../configure ...
now - in r1406 - i can't do th
i have two issues
1. in the times of 0.1.0 (around r1300) i was able to build the code
'not in the source tree'. i downloaded the HEAD, made some dir inside,
and was able to do:
../bootstrap
../configure ...
now - in r1406 - i can't do that. when i try i get:
$ ../bootstrap
aclocal: `confi
lou.openocd...@fixit.nospammail.net pisze:
> Freddie (and/or anybody else who is interested in this): Please test the
> attached patch against svn trunk and see if it works properly with an RLink.
for now I can test only with Primer1, so here it goes.
1. openocd compiles fine
2. openocd starts fi
On Mar 10, 2009, at 11:40 AM, Dirk Behme wrote:
Rick Altherr wrote:
On Mar 9, 2009, at 10:33 PM, Dirk Behme wrote:
Dirk Behme wrote:
Kees Jongenburger wrote:
Hi Duane and others,
I finally managed to get this thing working (using Duane's patch
therefore ...thanks). The last piece I was mis
On Tue, Mar 10, 2009 at 8:58 PM, Scott Rubenstein
wrote:
> Greetings,
>
> Does anyone know if the Marvell PXA310 is supported yet?
Marvell's got all their stuff under NDA, so that makes it "incompatible"
with GPL in terms of the community at large making fleeting vain
attempts at fixing problems
Greetings,
Does anyone know if the Marvell PXA310 is supported yet?
Best regards,
Scott
___
Openocd-development mailing list
Openocd-development@lists.berlios.de
https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/openocd-development
> -Original Message-
> From: openocd-development-boun...@lists.berlios.de
> [mailto:openocd-development-boun...@lists.berlios.de] On
> Behalf Of Michael Jäntsch
> Sent: 10 March 2009 17:46
> To: openocd-development@lists.berlios.de
> Subject: Re: [Openocd-development] ST32-PerformanceS
Rick Altherr wrote:
>
> On Mar 9, 2009, at 10:33 PM, Dirk Behme wrote:
>
>> Dirk Behme wrote:
>>> Kees Jongenburger wrote:
Hi Duane and others,
I finally managed to get this thing working (using Duane's patch
therefore ...thanks). The last piece I was missing was something Arn
That is pretty much what I was thinking.
The 500kHz is set by the target file that comes with openocd
$OPENOCD_DIR$/target/stm32stick.cfg . I tried to set it to a different
speed, but that was basically just guessing. I thought that the jtag_khz
in the target file would work for me.
I attache
The error messages indicate that we are talking to the interface, but
the JTAG signals don't appear to be valid. I don't know anything
about the ST32-PerformanceStick, but I'd check pinout and voltage
rails. OpenOCD is trying to talk to the JTAG tap and is just getting
bogus data. That i
lou.openocd...@fixit.nospammail.net pisze:
> Freddie (and/or anybody else who is interested in this): Please test the
> attached patch against svn trunk and see if it works properly with an RLink.
damn [; 15 minutes too late [; i'll be able to check that tomorrow.
anyway - about the S/N we were t
Hi,
thanks for that. That's what I tried to do first. I tried it again and
it does not change anything.
mmh...
does not look good.
I might have to switch to Windows and use the Software that came with
the stick...
Michael
Dean Glazeski schrieb:
> Michael,
>
> Try configuring the interface, th
Michael,
Try configuring the interface, the ft2232 stuff, before the target.
I've had issues before when I configured my board before the interface,
so see if that helps.
// Dean
Michael Jäntsch wrote:
Hi everyone,
I am still hoping that somebody can point me into the right direction,
co
On Mar 10, 2009, at 4:20 AM, Petri Pirttinen wrote:
Greetings,
This is my first post to the list so please bear with me as I couldn't
find the guidelines of the list.
I have so far used very old version of OOCD and now wanting to
upgrade.
I compiled the tagged 0.1.0 code in cygwin and have
On Mar 9, 2009, at 10:33 PM, Dirk Behme wrote:
Dirk Behme wrote:
Kees Jongenburger wrote:
Hi Duane and others,
I finally managed to get this thing working (using Duane's patch
therefore ...thanks). The last piece I was missing was something
Arnim
Läuger (urjtag) already told
us that the D
On Mon, Mar 09, 2009 at 05:21:59PM -0500, lou.openocd...@fixit.nospammail.net
wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 09, 2009 at 06:15:40PM +0100, Freddie Chopin wrote:
> > and is there a need to detect the device after all? can't the other SRST
> > lines be an input on all variants? this way they wouldn't make a
Hi everyone,
I am still hoping that somebody can point me into the right direction,
concerning my Problem with the ST32-PerformanceStick. I was hoping that
this would moreless work out of the box, because it is stated in the
documentation that this stick is supported by openocd. There is a
stm
Greetings,
This is my first post to the list so please bear with me as I couldn't
find the guidelines of the list.
I have so far used very old version of OOCD and now wanting to upgrade.
I compiled the tagged 0.1.0 code in cygwin and have also tried to run
the win32 binary of it. However it it
22 matches
Mail list logo
