Re: There is no workaround for JDK-8324327

2024-05-09 Thread PavelTurk
n the palette and it would work as expected.  This is just a workaround, the bug is still there. -andy *From: *openjfx-dev on behalf of PavelTurk *Date: *Thursday, May 9, 2024 at 07:56 *To: *openjfx-dev@openjdk.org *Subject: *There is no workaround for JDK-8324327 Hello all. This is about

Re: There is no workaround for JDK-8324327

2024-05-09 Thread Andy Goryachev
Date: Thursday, May 9, 2024 at 07:56 To: openjfx-dev@openjdk.org Subject: There is no workaround for JDK-8324327 Hello all. This is about https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8324327 . Andy Goryachev wrote in comment "Change to the default constructor and the issue disappears". I don&

There is no workaround for JDK-8324327

2024-05-09 Thread PavelTurk
Hello all. This is about https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8324327 . Andy Goryachev wrote in comment "Change to the default constructor and the issue disappears". I don't see that using default constructor solves the problem. I tried the following code : public class JavaFxTest7 extends App