Hi Michael,
yes you are right. It could live in parallel.
> On 18. Apr 2023, at 20:23, Michael Strauß wrote:
>
> Hi Clemens,
>
> when you talk about doing it faster, are you concerned about performance?
>
> Creating an API for the JavaFX image loaders is also a possibility,
> but that's muc
Hi Clemens,
when you talk about doing it faster, are you concerned about performance?
Creating an API for the JavaFX image loaders is also a possibility,
but that's much more difficult to get done.
We can always do that in the future though, the proposed support for
Java Image I/O doesn't close a
You can do it via non public API much faster. You can have a look into LibrawFX
or LibHeifFX.
What would help is to make the existing API public.
Clemens
> On 18. Apr 2023, at 17:51, John Neffenger wrote:
>
> On 4/17/23 2:10 PM, Michael Strauß wrote:
>> I've been working on a proposal that
On 4/17/23 2:10 PM, Michael Strauß wrote:
I've been working on a proposal that doesn't add any new API to
JavaFX, but instead plugs into the existing `javax.imageio` API,
allowing applications to use third-party libraries like TwelveMonkeys
[0] to load a wide variety of image formats.
Looks int
