Hi Michael, yes you are right. It could live in parallel.
> On 18. Apr 2023, at 20:23, Michael Strauß <michaelstr...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Hi Clemens, > > when you talk about doing it faster, are you concerned about performance? > > Creating an API for the JavaFX image loaders is also a possibility, > but that's much more difficult to get done. > We can always do that in the future though, the proposed support for > Java Image I/O doesn't close any door here. > > > >> On Tue, Apr 18, 2023 at 8:11 PM clemens.lantha...@itarchitects.at >> <clemens.lantha...@itarchitects.at> wrote: >> >> You can do it via non public API much faster. You can have a look into >> LibrawFX or LibHeifFX. >> >> What would help is to make the existing API public. >> >> Clemens
